Is Liu Bei a decent gentleman? Why is Liu Bei a hypocrite?

I don't think so, I think Cao Cao is a gentleman, although he has real power, but he doesn't usurp the throne, he is still loyal to the Han Dynasty, but although Liu Bei is full of benevolence, righteousness and morality, he is not the king.

Liu Bei has never been a gentleman, a hypocrite, a pyramid scheme leader, a legendary speculator, a clever **, after letting others believe that he is a clan, he uses it to enhance his fame, fame to make friends with the clan, everyone picks up firewood and the flame is high, you can find out who Liu Bei is unlucky, and he himself is growing a little bit.

No, I remember that after Emperor Han Xian was deposed, I didn't know if Emperor Han Xian was called emperor when he died. Jingzhou was lost, Guan Yu was killed, and Liu Bei ostensibly avenged Guan Yu, but in fact to recapture Jingzhou.

The person who is the emperor cannot be measured by a gentleman and a villain Liu Bei and Cao Cao Sun Quan fight for the world Of course, interests come first If you are a gentleman, it is estimated that you will die long ago and will not go to Yizhou Jingzhou is divided into three parts of the world Yizhou Jingzhou is a place where people surnamed Liu are in charge.

In the Chronicles of the Three Kingdoms, it is said that Liu Bei is a repetitive villain, and he is indeed not a righteous gentleman. He has no political position of his own, and has taken refuge in various warlords, as long as he can give his mouth to eat.

Of course not, he held back from the beginning, until what means did he use to defeat Cao Cao later? A good lobbyist at best, and a favor for himself. He is the kind of person who likes to use tears and righteousness to deceive others into their loyalty to him.

Hypocrite, it's terrible, it's not as good as a real villain.

No, a righteous gentleman will never be an emperor.

I don't think so, it's too empty.

Liu Bei is considered a hypocrite, and the following historical facts can show that:

1, "Three visits to the thatched house", I wanted to recruit Zhuge Liang to my subordinates, but said that the treatment was not good (Liu Bei had also been displaced when he answered and trembled), so on the one hand, he said that he was a noble royal blood, and on the other hand, he said that he wanted to save the people of the world from fire and water, and he was affectionate, and finally deceived Zhuge Liang out of the mountain and began to live in the Central Plains;

2, Liu Bei was separated from his family after the defeat, Zhao Zilong single-handedly protected his son, seven in and seven out, and sent Liu Adou to Liu Bei's hands, but Liu Bei threw it into the ground, saying "almost let me lose a general", after the Qing Dynasty, Zhao Zilong followed Liu Bei with all his heart;

3. Before Liu Bei died, he asked Zhuge Liang to Gu and said: "After Gu dies, if Adou is not worthy of support, Qing can replace him." It was this sentence that made Zhuge Liang bow to the essence for a dou who couldn't be supported, and finally died of illness.

The above epics show that Liu Bei is a hypocrite.

Liu Bei is not a hypocrite, but Cao Cao is definitely a villain.

Don't take evil as small, don't take good as small. A person who never slaughtered the city, was loved by the people, treated others leniently, and was strict with himself, such a person, do you say he was a true gentleman or a hypocrite? The evaluation of Liu Bei by the characters in the Three Kingdoms period and the evaluation of Liu Bei by later generations are mostly positive, but today there are some clowns who jump off the beam, in order to sensationalize and slander Liu Bei, can they come up with real evidence?

Do you think that the talents, morals, intelligence, and intelligence of the people who are black Liu Bei now are superior or inferior compared with so many celebrities who admired Liu Bei positively in ancient times? Look at his words, look at his deeds, look at the people around him, look at his opponents, whether they are good or evil, different people have different views. People are not saints and sages, let alone political figures, but in the major right and wrong, Liu Bei is a rare benevolent and righteous king.

Then the dynasty he founded is still called Shu Han, can this be said to be a hypocrite?

Liu Bei is a gentleman, because Liu Bei has a long-term vision and can know how to make good use of people's hearts, so he has also made small achievements in history.

Liu Bei is a gentleman, throughout history, Liu Bei has never done anything villain to his subordinates, and he is sincerely good to his subordinates.

Liu Bei is both a gentleman and a villain, Liu Bei is the restoration of the Han Dynasty and the abduction of the Han Dynasty.