Nikon or Canon s cameras do better at night

Recommending a good camera for night scenesCard cameras are the main criteria for measuring digital cameras in terms of their small size, relatively light body, and ultra-thin and sleek design. Card digital cameras can be carried around without being cumbersome; And on formal occasions, putting them in the pocket of a suit will not fall and deform the coat; Ladies no longer have to find room to squeeze them in; On other occasions, it is also acceptable to tuck the camera into a jeans pocket or simply hang it around your neck. The most basic compensation function is still standard with ultra-thin digital cameras, and with the addition of zone or spot metering modes, these little things can still be used to complete some photographic creations sometimes.

At least you can have basic control over the picture, and with options such as color, clarity, contrast, etc., a lot of beautiful ** can also come from these small things that are not looked down upon by the "masters". Advantages: Fashionable appearance, large LCD screen, small and slim body, easy to operate.

Disadvantages: The manual function is relatively weak, the large LCD screen consumes a lot of power, and the lens performance is poorSony's selling point is: pay attention to the appearance of the design Pure professional technology is not as good as Nikon and Canon Panasonic did not choose:

The camera is well done The camera technology and quality are not complimented Fujifilm consumer camera: the professional machine is well done The consumer machine has a high repair rate Unexpected faults are out of Olympus: pay attention to appearance and technology It is stronger than Sony It is not very professional He is a leader in the medical field But the camera is not good Canon:

The appearance is not as good as Sony's technology is much more professional than Sony's.

I recommend you to buy: Nikon or Canon card player Reason: These two manufacturers are the world's largest and most powerful professional camera manufacturers, the technical indicators are very high, the after-sales service and accessories are very high, and the ** is not high, good quality and affordable.

Canon model IXUS 110 is **: 2100 yuan.

Night view, look at the budget, of course, the SLR is better, and the large format with money is better (just kidding, 10 tens of thousands of RMB).

Basically, the night scenes of digital cameras are the same, very ordinary.

The night view is not as good as the tripod. If you put it on the shelf, no matter what kind of camera, as long as it has a manual function, there is no problem.

However, more often than not, it is handheld, so it depends on the high sensitivity of the camera. Theoretically, this is related to the size of the camera's imaging elements, so theoretically the best should be a top-of-the-line DSLR. Ordinary card machines, due to the small area of the imaging element (1 10 below the ordinary SLR, 1 20 below the full pair), so the handheld night scene basically has no picture quality at all.

As for the smaller phone cameras, it goes without saying.

But considering the cost and ease of use, I think the best choice is a single electric (or mirrorless), with a slightly smaller imaging element than an ordinary SLR (but still much larger than an ordinary card machine), and the size and use of the ordinary card machine are no different, of course** generally to reach the level of entry SLR.

Specific models, Panasonic's GF series, Olympus' E-PEN series, and Sony's NEX series are all good choices.

If the SLR will not be at all, then it is guaranteed that the ** you shoot is worse than the ordinary digital camera, if you use a DSLR.

It is recommended to buy a regular one. SLRs are big and heavy, so let's get to know them first.

SLR recommended. But more important is a sturdy and stable tripod.

It has little to do with the camera, it's mostly about human technology.

Although SLR is good, it is not better to buy a card machine, which is simple and easy to use.

...All three can shoot night scenes... And the performance is not the same for different **. Supposedly, Canon colors should be more conspicuous.

Sony's lenses are too expensive. Sony's SLR costs tens of thousands of yuan, and the single-electric night scene that is better and not too expensive is still not as good as the SLR.

If the budget is only a few thousand, both Canon and Nikon will do. The low-end Nikon D5100 has a better high sense, and the SLR of the same period, the more expensive the fuselage**, the better the high sense. (Except for the old machines of D90) In addition, to ensure the picture quality of night scenes, basically you have to put on a tripod.

Nikon 5100 and Canon 650D are all OK. The Canon 650D may be a little better at night shots. This is because flash is rarely used in night shots, except for night portraits.

In order to shoot beautiful night scenes, a high ISO value is used to increase the shutter speed of the camera, but at the same time, because high ISO produces noise and makes the image grainy, it depends on which camera is better in this regard. Canon has a long reputation for high ISO noise reduction and ISO extension, especially in high-end products. As a reminder, for night shots, it is best to use a tripod for stable imaging.

This is not a problem with the brand, some models focus on night shooting, and some focus on daytime shooting, and it will be clear if you go to the forum more.

In the field of ordinary digital cameras, all three belong to the first-line brands, and the effect and performance are almost the same, and whether you can shoot a good night scene mainly depends on your personal photography skills.