Which mobile phone has a better function of shooting night scenes?

Sony Ericsson G900 (pictured).

**It is necessary to explain that the standard configuration is 2480,**2700 (2g card, original 2 batteries and 1 charge).

The G900 measures 106 49 13 mm and is available in red and black (if the landlord is not very old, it is also dazzling with red).

Sony Ericsson G900 built-in 5 million pixel autofocus camera, built-in flash support, provides ** image stabilization technology, red eye removal, "photo fix", "**blog" and many other shooting functions. The most distinctive feature is that it provides a unique "touch autofocus" function, which is very user-friendly.

Although it is still a notch lower than that of a digital camera, it is more than enough to cope with daily shooting.

Shoot a sample, from the bubble.

Pros: The exterior is plain and has a retro aesthetic. (Personally, I think the mobile phone is a close-fitting thing, the same as clothes, mm pays more attention to appearance, nokia's mobile phones are more man, more atmospheric, not suitable for mm use) (good workmanship, but there are still defects in the detail design, like n78, n82 keys are very torsional).

13mm ultra-thin body, a good choice for ultra-thin intelligence.

Inch hard touch screen, avoid dead corners, easy to use.

The dual input of the handwriting keyboard is in line with the usage habits of Chinese people.

The intelligent system with a new interface makes the operation simpler and the interface more gorgeous. (Smartphones are more than CPU: Nokia's are mostly 369MHz, and Soeson's are 208MHz, but the speed is not slow, and the CPU is low and power saving).

The sticky notes feature is very useful.

Built-in 5-million-pixel camera that supports hand-touch focusing.

I hope the information I provided will be helpful to you!

The K750C is a little better, but it looks outdated now...

Try the K858C

Samsung phones have the best photo results!

This is the Nokia 925 shot – Metro UI is made for smoothness. The luxury of the iPhone is not pursued, and the trend of Android is not followed. Simple but not simple to imitate, I have a reputation for being beyond what I have seen in Lumia 925

Again, Canon ***d is just a market-oriented product, every upgrade is a toothpaste-like upgrade, and the upgrade speed is frequent, this is a typical money-making machine, who said that K30 is yellowish, Pentax has a strong color, the color is easy to overflow, about the machine for shooting night scenes, if it is to play, it is necessary to choose Pentax, and buy K30 is not as good as buying K5, K5 surpasses K30 in all aspects, night scenes have a lot to do with lenses and shooting techniques, and not HDR can shoot good night scenes, small aperture, For a long time**,To have a good shelf,If the public buys 650D,If you want to playK5,Sensor,650D The new sensor should have a little advantage,In addition, the best sensor of APS-C is PentaxK5,Nikon D7000 and Canon7D,Basically, the peak of the half-width sensor is really about 1600W pixels,K5You can use ISO3200,There are few sensors that can be used to this ISO,In addition, almost all Pentax machines have HDR, Let's talk about positioning in addition, mid-range flagships: D7K, 7D, K5; Mid-range D90, 60D, of course, Pentax K30, KR is also close to this level in terms of performance; Starter: 650D, D5100, D3200, KR, K01, Below Starter:

1100d, d3100, I don't think it's necessary for photography to be a machine below the entry level,。。

The Canon 650D is definitely more than a little stronger than the K30 and is a machine of a different grade.

Pentax K30 bar, the mid-range SLR with an entry-level SLR coat, in addition to no shoulder screen, K30 is also three-proof, Canon's entry machine is really a plastic shell, you can go to the experience store to experience it, you will know it in your hand, the money is all spent on advertising, and whether it is Canon 550D, 600D or now 650D, his core CMOS will always be the one that counts down in the evaluation, but every time it is not painful under the small changes, the other 650D and K5 Hong Kong line** It's not much closer, K5 is a pinnacle machine in A-format, first at the **freezing point, it's worth starting, just for reference.

The K30 completes the 650D, the K30 is a mid-range machine, and the 650D is an entry-level machine.

Personally, I don't think it's better to buy Canon and Nikon, because their machines at this level are too average and not as cost-effective as Pentax. It's just that the advertising is well done and the popularity is high. Continue to the two on the top floor, I am also a hardcore Bin, Pentax's machine is definitely not lost to mud pits and fake energy, if the rice is less, buy a second-hand kr, now it is 2300-2600, the bottom line, **, don't go to NC's! Stinky feet!

We recommend the Fujifilm F305 EXR

Feature 1: The focusing speed of the ultra-fast He Ze, compared with the digital card machine, the shutter lag is very annoying, and the F305 has been improved here.

Feature 2: Ultra-wide angle, 24-360mm, very practical.

Feature 3: Fujifilm EXR super CCD, good image processing; 1 2ccd, the size is also large; 3-inch 460,000-pixel LCD screen, the display effect is not bad. Zen Shed.

I bought one for a friend, it feels very good to use, and the overall performance is good.

w595, I use this talk about mu now. I'm also listening to ** on Q photography or something, the pixels are good. And it's beautiful, I bought the blue ha. **Hanpaisen is also similar, it is the sliding cover of this shed.

That's good. My phone doesn't shoot so well at night.

HS22 is better,First of all,22The CMOS is 1 2,In terms of size, it is larger than 100's 1,The noise control effect of the large-size image sensor is definitely better than that of the small size,Second,22The CMOS is not exactly R-CMOS,But Fujifilm has integrated its own technology EXR-CMOS,EXR technology has a technical advantage in noise control,So on the whole, the shooting effect of 22 in low light is definitely stronger than 100.

The HS22 has a high configuration, and manual zoom is convenient.