Why did Asian countries also participate in the NATO meeting, is it to encircle China?

It depends on what kind of meeting is opened, looking at the strategic vertical and horizontal game of various countries.

We can see that the United States has recently stepped up its subversion efforts in the Middle East, especially in Syria, where local conflicts have continued to break out in recent days, in fact, the United States wants to seek the development of the situation in Syria in a direction favorable to the United States. From an international point of view, the detention of Chinese sailors by North Korea in Asia is actually the same as the attack on the Mekong River, and Emperor M is trying to collapse the relationship between China and Linguo and further divide China's forces in the Asia-Pacific region, but Thailand's relations with China are still good, and this is all handled properly by some methods of the motherland. First of all, China's photovoltaic industry has been investigated by the United States anti-dumping investigation, as well as Confucius Institutes, etc., which is a signal to some anti-China forces in the world, including the British Prime Minister's meeting with Dalai and Lai a few days ago, which is a challenge to the dignity of China's sovereign state.

In fact, the relationship between countries is like this, divided and merged, and the economy of the whole world is gradually integrated, just like the United States now, what he wants most is not to fight with China, but to drag down China, because fighting a war is very money-consuming, and there is no benefit in going to war with China, which will only make the American economy sink deeper. Fighting a war is a war, the economy is an economy, you have me, I have you, and the meeting that should be held must always be held. This is a bit like when the Chinese wanted to help the euro against the dollar, and now the euro has succumbed to attack the Chinese economy with the United States.

In fact, the United States, China, Russia, NATO, who and no one are monolithic, they all have their own interests, and perhaps the current cooperation is only temporary. China is also actively participating in the construction of the world's international cooperation organizations

Is it not possible to invite participation?

It is simply impossible for China not to join NATO. This organization is a product of the reality of the unilateral bloc led by the United States, and China advocates a multi-level world, and it is impossible for the United States to join NATO.

The full name of NATO is the "North Atlantic Treaty Organization", which is a community of allies established by the United States during World War II to deal with the "Warsaw Pact Organization" of the Soviet Union.

Brother: You're not kidding, are you? What is NATO?

NATO is short for the "North Atlantic Treaty Organization". It is currently the largest military bloc in the world.

On April 4, 1949, the United States, Canada, and a number of European countries signed the North Atlantic Treaty in Washington. On August 24 of the same year, NATO was officially established. There are currently 19 NATO member states, and they are:

United States, Canada, United Kingdom, France, Italy, Belgium, Denmark, Netherlands, Portugal, Luxembourg, Iceland, Norway, Greece, Turkey, Germany, Spain, Poland, Hungary, Czech Republic. The latter three countries joined on 12 March this year.

NATO countries practice collective defense. In other words, in the event of a war between any member state and another country, NATO must assist, including military assistance. In peacetime, with the exception of France and Spain, most member states appoint a part of their armed forces under the unified command of NATO.

Iceland has no army and no troops to send.

NATO's highest decision-making body is the North Atlantic Council, and on the military side, there are three main commands, namely: the Allied Supreme Command in the Atlantic, the Allied High Command in Europe, and the Canada-America Regional Planning Group. In addition, more than 20 countries have established partnerships for peace with NATO.

You see, whether in terms of geographical location or social system, China and NATO are not reliable, not to mention that we are still a non-aligned country, and it would be good not to fight with NATO.

After the Second World War, many oppressed nations achieved political independence and established nation-states after a long period of struggle in different forms. Except for a few countries that have embarked on the path of socialism.

Most countries have opted for the capitalist system. Most of these countries pursue nationalist policies, advocate safeguarding national sovereignty and independence, oppose foreign aggression and interference, emphasize the equality of all countries, big or small, and the practice of mutual benefit between poor and rich countries, and are an important force in opposing colonialism, imperialism, and hegemonism and establishing a new international political and economic order in the international arena. In order to oppose hegemonist expansion and the threat of force and to oppose the infiltration and control of international monopoly capital, they have waged active struggles and established many regional or multilateral international cooperation organizations, which have played a non-negligible role in breaking the situation in which big powers dominate the world, safeguarding world peace, and promoting economic development.

The North Atlantic Treaty is an alliance, China's foreign policy is non-alignment, and even Russia, which has the best relations with China, is only a strategic partnership!

In the early stage, NATO was anti-Soviet Union, and the Soviet Union collapsed.

But NATO has always existed as an organization for the United States to control military power in Europe.

In order to give NATO a reason to exist, the theory of the China threat emerged, so NATO is now mainly dealing with China and at the same time suppressing Russia.

If we join, won't NATO be self-conscious?

Our country does not participate in the internal affairs of other countries, and NATO's purpose is to suppress Russia and Belarus, which is to suppress the internal affairs of other countries, which is not in line with our country's national conditions. If our country participates in NATO and other countries and defeats Russia and Belarus, the United States will definitely turn around and attack our country. There are so many wise leaders in our country of 1.4 billion people, and they will surely see through the words and deeds of the United States!

The leadership of our country cannot be stupid enough to follow the United States as a prestige.

First of all, you have to know the meaning of the word "NATO". The abbreviation of the North Atlantic Treaty was used against the "Warsaw Pact" (Warsaw Pact bloc) bloc established by the Soviet Union that year. Now that the USSR has collapsed and the Warsaw Pact no longer exists, isn't it obvious the meaning of NATO's existence and who it is used to deal with?

I can't even say anything, and I always rush green onions. is still old on stage, go back to the furnace and practice well. It's disgusting.

Elementary school students can't ask such questions, and they are ignorant ......, you can laugh.

The naïve question NATO is used by Europe and the United States against Russia and China,

What does it mean that "it is impossible for China not to join NATO?" False propositions, how to discuss?

First of all, I have to say that you are naïve.

If China buys a piece of territory on the northern Atlantic coast (as the United States bought territory with Britain in the past), will China be able to enter NATO?

Now it is impossible to buy territory and the like (when it comes to issues such as strategic depth). NATO was originally a military organization of capitalist countries against socialist countries, which established the Warsaw Pact (which was dissolved after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991).

China is still a socialist country, right? How could NATO possibly agree to your membership?

If both China and Russia join NATO, will the world become unipolar?

The trend of the world is multipolar. The so-called unipolarity does not mean the existence of a military or political alliance, but the existence of only one or a few military, political, and economic powers.

There are also multipolar presences within NATO, such as the United States, Britain, and France. In the 70s there were two superpowers in the world, the United States and the Soviet Union. At that time, the world was under unipolarity, and now it is only possible that more and more emerging countries will rise, such as China, India, Brazil, Iran.

So the future of the world tends to be multipolar.

You'll have to try a little bit more militarily and politically. I think you're probably going to be a junior high school student at the most.

China's Refusal to Join NATO China's diplomacy has always been based on the principle of peace, NATO is an organization sanctioned by military policy, and the United States, a member of NATO, will not take the initiative to join NATO, nor will the United States allow China to join NATO.

We're on Earth, they're in the fireball. Ethnicity, the predominantly ethnic group of these organizations is very different from China; Historical factors: These organizations were mainly based on historical colonial overlords, and gained a lot of wealth from colonial plunder.

China was not a colonial suzerainty before, and it was not a type of country in history, so it could not be reconciled; Geographical factors, these organizations are regional organizations in the North Pacific and Western Europe, and China is not in this region. This organization is still a realistic product of the unilateral bloc headed by the beautiful country, and our country advocates a multi-level world, and it cannot talk about allies of the beautiful country, let alone join NATO! I hope my answer will be helpful to you, and don't forget to give a thumbs up to help more people.

Give people roses and leave a lingering fragrance! Thank you.

Unipolarization is not good, the industrial revolution led to the emergence of unipolarity, and then there was world colonization, multipolarization is the best, just like the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period, it depends on who plays the vertical and horizontal art well.

I can only say that you have a nervous problem, China will never join NATO, you should study history and local realities.

This is absolutely impossible, not to mention other countries, at least the United States will not agree.

If it's the Asian version of NATO, maybe it can.

You're a bit early in the day, and you'll talk about it when you're an adult.