After death, is it better to be buried or cremated?

Updated on society 2024-02-27
23 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    I think it's better to choose cremation than burial when people die. Although the burial feels like keeping the body intact, in fact, once a person is buried in the ground, it is also eaten by various microorganisms and insects, and the sparks are directly gone.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    People return to the soil when they are old, and the leaves return to their roots. Isn't it better to protect flowers when the leaves fall to the roots and turn into spring mud? Doesn't these words indicate that burial should be more appropriate?

    I think it's better to be buried, just do it simply. In contrast, cremation also has a higher air pollution index.

    Good morning. Send a beautiful picture, I wish you happiness and happiness!

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    After death, it must be cremated. Cremation is hygienic and does not compete with younger generations for land, so the state also advocates cremation.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Of course, cremation is better, and cremation is also the current way of funeral. And it's more space-saving, not too big.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Because the state now has to be cremated even after death, it is better to cremate people after death, because it does not occupy land and is environmentally friendly. Let it be. Because the state now has to be cremated even after death, it is better to cremate people after death, because it does not occupy land and is environmentally friendly.

    Let it be. Because the state now has to be cremated even after death, it is better to cremate people after death, because it does not occupy land and is environmentally friendly. Let it be.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    After cremation, the burial occupies less space, and it is more environmentally friendly, although in people's minds it is said that it is safe to enter the soil, but in terms of the concept of environmental protection, cremation is more, and there are people who die in other places, and cremation is more convenient to transport, so after death, cremation is better. After cremation, the burial occupies less space, and it is more environmentally friendly, although in people's minds it is said that it is safe to enter the soil, but in terms of the concept of environmental protection, cremation is more, and there are people who die in other places, and cremation is more convenient to transport, so after death, cremation is better. After cremation, the burial occupies less space, and it is more environmentally friendly, although in people's minds it is said that it is safe to enter the soil, but in terms of the concept of environmental protection, cremation is more, and there are people who die in other places, and cremation is more convenient to transport, so after death, cremation is better.

  7. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Of course, it is better to be cremated, because if you are buried, it may cause more environmental problems and say that a kind of land resource occupation problem or words are relatively speaking, compared to saving land resources and burning this painting, there is only a box of ashes, and it is more convenient for family members to visit and mourn.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Sentence 1: Cremation costs are actually higher.

    Due to the monopoly operation of the funeral industry and the lack of market regulation mechanism, cremation generally costs a lot of money. Some old farmers have calculated this account, and cremation often costs 3000 to 200000 more than burial.

    The cremation fee is 800, the corpse storage fee is 500 yuan per day, the funeral home occupation fee is 300 to 500 yuan, the urn is 800 to 10,000, the rural distance may be relatively far, and there is also a car rental fee.

    In addition, it may be necessary to spend on the body for refrigeration and embalming, plastic surgery and dressing, and ashes storage. The fees vary from place to place, but they all cost a lot more.

    The second sentence is that cremation is not necessarily environmentally friendly.

    First of all, cremation requires the use of energy such as diesel, or causes a waste of resources. In addition, harmful gases such as carbon monoxide and sulfur dioxide are emitted during cremation, not to mention the smell of burning corpses and the ashes that waft out.

    Third, the burial system has long been deeply rooted in the hearts of the people.

    Dust to dust, soil to earth, people in ancient times paid attention to the soil for peace, paid special attention to funeral, thousands of years of burial has long been deeply rooted in the hearts of the people.

    Moreover, people in ancient times attached great importance to the integrity of the corpse, and they all wanted to be decent and walk completely, which is also the reason why many old people felt anti-burial.

    After all, thousands of years of burial culture, if you want to change it directly, it must take a process, at present, many farmers and friends, it is indeed more acceptable to bury, do you think that is good?

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    Cremation is better after death, cremation can avoid people from producing various germs and toxic gases because of the decay of the corpse, and if there is a serious illness and death, there will be viruses, which may cause great harm to the human body. So it's better to be cremated.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    Burial is a cultural heritage left by thousands of years of ancestors, and now the coffin is still used for burial after cremation, and the land is not saved at all, and it also spends more money on cremation, polluting the environment and air, so it is still good to bury, and it is also humane. Burials should be classified as protected cultural heritage. It is said that burial occupies arable land, there are mountains in our mountainous areas, and grassland is not cultivated and can be buried, but after a hundred years, it can become grass or forests, and everything can be returned to forests and grasses, which is an advantage.

    Secondly, cremation and burning of corpses pollutes the atmosphere and is not good for air quality. Therefore, cremation and burial should be treated differently.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    I think it's better to be cremated after death, because burial is currently inconsistent with the concept of developing a circular economy or a resource-protecting society in China, and it will also occupy China's land resource area, and the per capita arable land is not very much, so I think this way, he must occupy a large part of the land utilization rate.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    After death, it must be cremated, it is better, generally it is cleaner after cremation, and there are no other moths. And it makes people feel it. There will also be a sense of emptiness in society as a whole. Otherwise, it's just that. Weird things happen all the time.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    People die like lights go out, and it makes no sense for the dead to talk about how to bury them, and this mainly affects the living.

    Chinese believe in the traditional custom of entering the soil for peace, always hoping that their relatives can be placed in a coffin after death, dig a grave for burial, and pay attention to feng shui treasures, so that they will be at ease. But in fact, this wish is becoming more and more difficult to realize, in order to save land, the state began to implement funeral reform, prohibiting burial in arable land, promoting cremation, and some places have been enforced, so there is no choice, cremation must be carried out.

    In fact, whether it is burial or cremation, it is just a matter of people's ideological concepts, habits are difficult to change, especially the customs formed for thousands of years have been deeply rooted in people's hearts, many people resist cremation, feel that the body of relatives after cremation is gone, and the soul has nowhere to attach, this is a feudal superstitious thought, which should be abandoned, and the soul does not exist after death, and it doesn't matter if the ghost or god says. If you believe these things, you will have them, and if you don't believe them, you will not have them, but in fact, they are just imagining and scaring themselves.

    People live for a lifetime, life does not bring, death does not bring, slippery comes, slippery goes, everything disappears after death, as for the corpse burial or cremation, it is just a different way of burial, and it will not have any impact on future generations, how many people are still prosperous after cremation, and how many people are still poor and backward after burial, who can say that burial is better than cremation?

    When you are alive, it is more important to let the old man live happily every day than anything else, rather than after death, the children will give the old man "filial piety" and worry about how to bury him. To put it selfishly, everything you do after death is to find psychological comfort for yourself, and it has no effect on the deceased person at all.

    Therefore, there is no question of which is better, burial or cremation, what is really responsible is the psychology and mind of the living.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    After a person dies, of course, it is better to be buried, because since ancient times, it has been believed that it is to enter the earth for heaven, so of course it is good to bury it!

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    A person's life should do something beneficial to the society, and doing something beneficial to the society is actually meaningful to our life, so in our life, or after a person dies, we must do something meaningful to human beings, so as to make our life more fulfilling. If you choose to be buried, because the land resources are getting less and less, it will affect future generations in such a situation, so that our future generations will suffer a lot of trouble. But if I choose cremation independently, it will be more environmentally friendly, and it will also allow us to get a better environment, which is good for future generations, so from this aspect, cremation is of course the best result, and burial will occupy resources is not the best choice, which must be clear.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    Personally, I think it's better to be cremated. Death itself is to disappear in this world, even if you leave a word of corpse, it is useless, if you say that it is cremated, it is as without a trace as when you came, and there is no trace when you go.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    Good or bad are all a return to nature, but the process is different, the cost is different, and the humanistic attitude is different. It is a funeral custom, a ritual of remembrance and a comparison between the way of thinking. After death, life stops, all kinds of metabolism stops, ideology disappears, and what remains in the world is a corpse, carbohydrates, and proteins.

    In order to maintain the dignity of the deceased, people in the past left a variety of customs, such as the deceased is big, and the earth is safe, etc., and cremation is a leading funeral method after the population is expanding and the land is tight, which reflects a kind of progress. In terms of ideological change, on the basis of cremation, there are more environmentally friendly forms of funeral such as tree burial and sea burial. Compared with the mausoleum burials of ancient kings in the past, tree burials and sea burials can better reflect the concepts of "environmental protection", "land conservation" and "changing customs".

    Since the results are all the same, if there is no major resistance in the family, cremation is still a better choice. In the public interest. Environmental protection and resource conservation.

    Comrade Xiaoping, our former state leader, also adopted the method of sea burial. Leaving nothing behind, it has set an example for the people of the whole country.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-20

    After death, I personally choose cremation, because cremation can save land area, cremation can also save money, and cremation is better than burial, so I personally choose cremation better than burial.

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-19

    It's better to be cremated. Man is a kind of living thing on earth, and when he dies, he is a pile of dry bones and carrion. Buried in the soil to breed bacteria. Persistent viruses. Cremated clean and non-toxic.

  20. Anonymous users2024-01-18

    Personally, I feel that cremation is better and more hygienic, in fact, the simpler and simpler the funeral ceremony, the more frugal the better, there is no need to be so extravagant and wasteful, China is not a developed country, and ordinary residents have not reached a high standard of living.

  21. Anonymous users2024-01-17

    Cremation is good, cremation and burial should respect personal wishes, respect folk customs, do not engage in one-size-fits-all, in fact, burial will not waste land, the ancients have been down for thousands of years, and have not seen graves around the village, especially in the countryside, the mountainous areas will not occupy arable land at all, there are ancestral grave mountains, buried after a few generations will be flat, return to nature. On the contrary, it is now cremation, building a cemetery, marble monument has a great impact on the environment, cemetery and marble monument will always stand there, occupy a piece of land less than a piece of land, advocate cremation, but also adapt measures to local conditions, China's land is vast and abundant, do not engage in one-size-fits-all, forced, as long as the rural area does not occupy arable land, you can choose burial according to your personal wishes, of course, to stop the big.

  22. Anonymous users2024-01-16

    After death, of course, it is better to be cremated, if it is buried, it will breed a lot of bacteria, although it is buried in the soil, but it is still not very advantageous.

  23. Anonymous users2024-01-15

    Cremation after death.

    There should be many aspects to this question. First of all, in the traditional concept of the Chinese, they all pay attention to entering the soil for safety. People want to keep a complete body after death and bury it in their hometown, so there is a saying that fallen leaves return to their roots.

    Therefore, when cremation was first introduced, many elderly people wept bitterly, which is completely understandable, because their beliefs are deeply ingrained.

    However, with the implementation of cremation, some outdated concepts need to be reformed, with the promotion of the intensity and the increase of ideological education, most people have begun to accept the cremation of the funeral method, that cremation is in line with the contemporary national conditions, but also a great progress in society.

    After all, the burial has caused a waste of land to a certain extent, the area of the cemetery occupied by the burial is very large, and the farmland around the cemetery cannot be cultivated, and the cultivated land area will gradually decrease, which will directly affect the agricultural development of our country.

    Moreover, the gradual decomposition of corpses in the ground will breed a large number of bacteria, which greatly destroys the peaceful environment of nature, and is also easy to cause the spread of diseases and the pollution of groundwater.

    It is precisely because of these factors that the state vigorously promotes the cremation system. The implementation of cremation is a major measure that truly benefits the country and the people.

    It's just that in most people's traditional beliefs, burial is a complete body and a real burial. And for cremation, many people think that it is too cruel, and their loved ones are pushed into the cremation oven, and when they come out, only a pile of ashes remains, which is really sad.

    But given the loss of land and the pollution caused by burial, cremation is preferable.

    Special phenomena in cremation:

    During the cremation process, the body makes a strange sound that sounds like the body is screaming, and the uninformed family thinks that the deceased is not really dead.

    The body could even be seen convulsing inside the crematorium, and it was likely that it would suddenly sit up. In fact, these are normal physical phenomena, when a person loses his life, the body will produce a large amount of gas and bacteria. When the temperature of the crematorium rises, the corpse will be affected by thermal expansion and contraction, and the gas will be ejected through the various orifices of the corpse, and when it flows through the vocal cords, it will emit various sounds.

    These are normal physical phenomena and there is no need to panic excessively.

Related questions
11 answers2024-02-27

The main positions of these three heroes are different.,You have to decide what position you want to play first.,Death Song is a mid-laner AP.,The ability to line and harvest is relatively strong.,But the requirements for operation are relatively high.,If you play well, it's a god.,If you don't play well, it's a pit.,The monkey is on the top or support,The top single monkey is still more ruthless.,It's well developed.,You can also block most of the opponent's skills in team battles to protect your own output.,But in the ranking,It's often banned.,The appearance rate is not high.,If you support,,Monkey outfit is relatively slow., The monkey that can't get up the meat is equal to nothing. And the policewoman is the lower road ADC, the hand is long, the clear soldiers and the tower are relatively fast, A person is the main output, that is, crispy, but the ADC is basically like this, the ADC must have a good sense of positioning, most of the people who get started with the ADC start with the policewoman. If the landlord prefers melee face fighting, it is recommended to buy monkeys, the meat can fight and resist, if you want to play remote output, buy a death song or a policewoman, of course, it still depends on what position you are used to playing, ADC is not good to play, it is also a big pit.

5 answers2024-02-27

Tooth loss not only affects the person's chewing function, but also affects the aesthetics, pronunciation and development, and in severe cases, it will cause periodontal tissue lesions and temporomandibular joint disease, so it is very necessary to repair the missing teeth in time. So, which restoration method to choose after tooth loss? That is, it is often said that it is inlay"Living teeth"Good; Or inlay"Dead teeth"Good; >>>More

19 answers2024-02-27

It must be 21 0 9, why I analyze it with you, the attack is the ultimate talent Reaper, which causes extra damage to units with less than 40% health, and Death Song is a reaper hero, such a talent is very necessary. At the same time, the Q and E of the dead song must be worn by the output method. Death Song's skill AP bonus is very low, which requires Death Song to stack AP higher than other mages to a certain extent, so the percentage of magic strength is also very important. >>>More

12 answers2024-02-27

Remember, in a person's life, you will meet countless people you can like, but it depends on your current situation, if you are in the unknown of what career you are doing now, I ask you if this kind of love has a result? What are you capable of taking on the responsibility of this love? >>>More

22 answers2024-02-27

Personal suggestion to study directly undergraduate, if you are an art student, the English score of the college promotion is not very important, but your college entrance examination English is more than 60 is also quite dangerous, you need to study hard, if you are not an art student, then you still go directly to the undergraduate......This college upgrade is really not very easy, and the college upgrade will take two more years, a total of 5 years, there are many exam subjects, it is better to go directly to the undergraduate, if you are calculating the tuition fee, directly to the undergraduate and the college to upgrade is about the same, there is no need to waste an extra year, and spend an extra year of living expenses.