Canon G12 and Nikon P7100 have high playability

Canon G12 is recommended, it is fully functional, and powerful, it is available to consumers of all kinds of tastes, some functions you don't like to use, others like it very much, it can't be said to be a decoration. Sharpness on the vista; G12 has an advantage. Close-up; The P7000 has advantages.

G12 has good memory interoperability and will not crash. No matter what kind of machine it is, it is made by the manufacturer with painstaking efforts. Who is the best, the majority of consumers have their own comments, I think G12 is more advantageous.

Playability: This depends on what you're going to play.

Playing with a camera, that is, the camera is equal to a toy, no matter which, on that function, play for half a year is almost the same, if you play with photography, both can be used, because portable, so you can take it with you at any time, you can shoot interesting scenes and things that you are interested in, and you can shoot **.

I've used the G12, and even though it's a backup, I think it's pretty good. The shutter aperture ISO that you need to learn for photography can be set manually, and there are many built-in effect filters, which can meet most shooting scenes. 10 million pixels, it doesn't look high, at 1920x1080 resolution, **it's enough to deal with it yourself to make computer wallpapers, I've washed 12 inches**, The sharpness is completely enough.

The two cameras are on par, but Nikon has one before the P7100, and there is another one that is the P7000, so the P7100

In fact, the upgraded version of the P7000 has improved a lot of flaws, and the playability is obviously higher than that of the G12.!

Hello landlord, G12 belongs to high-end DC, quasi-professional camera, SLR standby. The image quality and control are much better than the average DC, and the volume is much smaller than that of the SLR.

The P7000 belongs to the portable telephoto DC, in terms of image quality, it is slightly worse than the G12, and the handling is also stronger than the G12, but the P7000 has a wide coverage of the focal length (so the lens quality is not as good as that of the Canon).

In fact, Canon G12 should correspond to Nikon's P6000, and the sales volume is still higher than that of P6000, because G12 has been out for a short time, and the sales of the previous G10 and G11 are higher than those of P6000.

And Nikon's P7000 should correspond to Canon's SX200It also belongs to the portable telephoto, and the sales volume is more than SX200, because the Nikon P7000 is new.

SLR is the dominance of Nikon Canon, DC, low-end consumer DC, Canon's share is much higher than Nikon's, quasi-professional high-end consumer DC, Canon's share is slightly higher than Nikon's, and Canon's share is also much higher than Nikon's. (In the low-end consumer DC, Sony's Panasonic Fujifilm's share is higher than Nikon's, while the quasi-professional high-end consumer DC, Panasonic's is higher than Canon's, and the portable telephoto, Panasonic can also compete with Canon).

Then answer the landlord's question, these two camera types are different, the positioning is different, we must compare the sales volume, it must be G12 higher, although they are new, but G12 came out a little earlier, and the quasi-professional camera is already very mature, but it is a portable telephoto market, just emerging, and the sales volume is average.

Each region is different, and in general, the G12 still has a bit of an advantage.

Problems with saliva

It's all good machines.

But personally, I think the G12 is far better than the P7000

I've used them all.

The handling of the Nikon P7000 and Canon G12 is about the same. The functionality is similar.

When there is enough light, the P7000 performs about the same as the G12, and when the light is low, the G12 performs a little better (a very, very slight advantage). The main advantage of the G12 is the flip screen, while the advantage of the P7000 is the 7x optical zoom.

However, G12's ** is already similar to micro-mirror, single battery, and SLR. G12** even exceeds some entry-level SLRs, such as Pentax KX, Sony A450, and the image quality, handling, expandable Qinduzhou, focusing system, shutter system, etc. are far better than G12 This kind of "high-end DC", mirrorless Sony Nex3 or something, it is a comprehensive second killG12.

Well, in comparison, the cheaper Nikon P7000 with 7x optical zoom is still more justified to buy (to achieve 7x optical zoom with a single single scattered source SLR, you either have to be afraid to switch the two lenses, or you have to buy a large zoom lens, which is not cheap).

The Canon G12, which is expensive and average, let's play while playing.

If you compare the two, you can recommend Nikon P7000, which is much cheaper, with a better LCD display effect and a wider focal length.

Of course, if you can add a little more money, try to go to Sony NEX-5 or Panasonic GF2 and other micro-mirrors are the best, in addition to being more expensive, other performance seckill G12 such machines.

Nikon P7000 has not been used, it is not a bright attack, and the key is very clear, but I personally recommend buying Canon G12 This machine is good **Currently around 4000Brother Hong. 、

Compared with these three, they belong to the same grade, which one you buy will not be wrong, from the cost performance should be LX5, P7100, G12, G12 is the most expensive in terms of price, followed by P7100, and finally get LX5, personal advice, want to spend less money, and cost-effective is Panasonic LX5, if you think LX5 is small, Jianyi Nikon P7100, this machine is also good, there are more shortcut keys, it will be relatively easy to operate, And the dimming aperture and shutter are the same as Nikon SLR, they are all two knobs, Canon G12 that** is purely included in the advertising cost, this machine is good, but **high, not recommended.

As for the camera, the Canon is a bit more professional. You can take a look at the IXUS 510 HS, this one has good image processing, supports high-quality continuous shooting in 6 seconds, and the details can be captured very clearly. In addition, the body is thin and light, so it is easy to carry it out.

You can go to JD.com and watch it down.

Use LX5 for landscape photography and G12 for portraits

Definitely the P7000, just against Nikkor's 2 ED lenses, it is much stronger than the G12. Anyone who plays a Nikon SLR knows what ED lenses are all about.

If it's me personally, I will choose Nikon S7000, the camera products I have been using are all Nikon's, Nikon is more specialized than Canon's digital cameras, and the performance is stronger, Canon has been more popular in recent years because of good advertising! In terms of performance, Nikon's telephoto machine has been doing well, plus the optical zoom of this machine has reached, digital zoom, and the image processor is also very good! I strongly support the S7000

D7000 is called SLR, the performance is about the same, I am a Canon party, but I still like this P7000, reason: **low.

The performance of these two is about the same, buy Canon G12 and get a flip screen to play at will.

For a product on a horizontal line, there is no such thing as who is stronger than whom. It mainly depends on how well you have the image requirements and how familiar you are with the camera.

Nikon P7 series will be more complicated in operation,What it brings to you is"More professional"Feeling,The characteristics of imaging are high sharpness、Strong contrast,Thick colors,If you shoot people,It feels like "clearer",But for shooting girls,It's not necessarily a good thing。 In terms of focus and high-sensitivity imaging, it will be slightly inferior to Canon, after all, Canon has far more time and effort to work in the DC field than Nikon.

On Canon's side, the G1* series should be a little more balanced in imaging, with no special tendencies, basically flat and stable, and if you want to be distinctive, you will rely on the late stage; It is slightly pink and reddish to restore people's skin tone, which is more flattering than the Nikon P7 series.

If it is used for humanities documentary or landscape photography, I will choose Nikon's P7800; If it is used for daily recording at home and travel shooting, I will choose G16