Why didn t the Qing Dynasty destroy the book of Yan Zhai and destroy her, no one knows the original

Fat Yan Zhai is not a bookwriter, he is just a person who criticizes books, and the fat criticism is sandwiched between the lines of the manuscript of the Dream of Red Mansions, with eyebrow criticism, side criticism, clipping criticism, etc. ruined the text of Fat Yan Zhai, then it means that the Dream of Red Mansions is also ruined. Other literature mainly comes from the poetry and articles of the Ming Yi Dun brothers.

In fact, there is not much anti-feudal thought in the Red Mansion, Cao Xueqin or the author does not have such a high consciousness, and the anti-feudal thought is the result of the guidance of the Cultural Revolution. Now, with the deepening of understanding, there are very few people who mention anti-feudalism, so the reason why Dream of Red Mansions touches the sensitive nerves of the ruler is not the so-called anti-feudal thought, and certainly not the anti-Qing and Ming restoration. Kangxi once said that the Dream of Red Mansions is a family affair of the pearl (that is, it refers to Nalan Rongruo), and the definition of the Qing court is the family affair of an official eunuch.

Although it reflects the decay of the Qing ** to a certain extent, it will not be destroyed. Of course, there should be a certain degree of repression.

First of all, Dream of Red Mansions is not an anti-book. Its original intention was only to indict the destruction of human nature by feudal etiquette, and other historiographical and literary significance is also very great.

Qianlong also made relevant comments on "Dream of Red Mansions" back then, which at least proves that "Dream of Red Mansions" has been officially recognized.

During the Cultural Revolution, it was criticized as a poisonous weed.

Qin Shi Huang also burned books and pit Confucianism, but many books have been handed down to the present, that is some people who love books, they would rather not die, but also leave those precious books and knowledge to future generations, those are the crystallization of wisdom! As for whether the Qing Dynasty did not destroy the book of Yan Zhai, it was because those were just comments, and they had nothing to do with the book, and they did not touch the core of the Qing Dynasty rulers, and they did not cause harm to the Qing Dynasty like those organizations that "opposed the Qing Dynasty and restored the Ming Dynasty".

Hu Shi's evaluation of Dream of Red Mansions, as we all know, for him, Dream of Red Mansions is just a relatively good vernacular text**, and under his ranking, it is lower than Confucianism and Sea Flower.

So, there are at least two questions to consider when you want to criticize him.

First of all, for a work that Hu Shi does not attach so much importance to, is it necessary for Hu Shi to forge it?

Secondly, whether Hu Shi himself has a history of falsification.

Finally, whether the person or those people who put forward or implied that Hu Shi was false or Hu Shih's remarks were not credible had a record of falsification.

In fact, many of the contents of the fat review can be explained as a one-legged inner reading, and the few criticisms that show influence are often not commented on by the fat inkstone (Tangcun or Tera Wat have a significantly higher influence on the work than on the fat inkstone).

If you want to prove this, you have to come up with objective reasons.

Instead of determining the thoughts of an author and the thoughts of a fat inkstone according to the preferences of the reviewer, if from the perspective of reader-centrism, then your "on the surface, in fact like that" reading is contrary to the Red Chamber (even if it is really contrary, you can't say that it is false, because the reviewer and the writer are two people, there is no reason why their thoughts must be highly consistent), then others can also prove that the fat review is true in the same way, this kind of ring in addition to increasing the number of onlookers, What's the point?

It is recommended that you read the two versions of "Fat Yan Zhai Re-evaluation of the Stone Record" Gengchen and Jiazhu. The following is the information I searched: The currently known lipid books are basically found by the world after the May Fourth period, a total of 12 kinds, of which the more important ones are:

1.Jiazhu book (this is the earliest book known at present), originally titled "Fat Yan Zhai Jiaxu Copying and Re-commenting on the Stone Record", only 16 times remain, compared with other editions, there are "wedges" that are not found in other books before the first round, and the previous and later batches of each return are also relatively concentrated and complete, which has high academic value for the study of the process and writing structure of the "Stone Record".

2.Ji Mao and Geng Chen, these two books have been verified to belong to the same fat evaluation system, the criticism on the two books is roughly the same, should belong to the same base of the almost simultaneous transcript, Ji Mao is entitled "Fat Yan Zhai Re-evaluation of the Stone Record", and the same record in the wedge of the Jiazhu book, and in the text there are "Fat Yan Zhai Fan four reading review", "Ji Mao Winter Moon final" words; Gengchen is the largest number of preserved copies of a fat book, seventy-eight extant times, is the closest to Cao Xueqin's death time of a book, so it is also the most in line with Cao Xueqin's last revision of the creative intention of the book, in the current lipid review system, generally as the original basic reference of the base.

3.Qi preface, collected and prefaced by Qi Lisheng of Deqing in the Qianlong period, has reference significance because of the unique writing method of "one voice and two songs, one hand and two songs" in the preface.

4.The Jing Zang Edition, which disappeared during the ten years of catastrophe, is by no means an ordinary collection because the collector of this book is Wu Nai, who is the main compiler of the "Xi Dynasty Ya Song Collection" (which contains poems about Cao Xueqin by the Duncheng brothers and others).

There are also a variety of lipid manuscripts and transcripts handed down, and the biggest difference between these lipid copies and Cheng Gaoben is that the base of the lipid book is earlier than Cheng Gao's book; There are only 80 copies of the lipid system, and even if there are 120 copies, they are all transcribed from the Cheng book by later generationsThe fat book retains a large number of fat inkstone comments, while the Cheng book completely deletes them;Cheng Ben has rewritten some chapters and contents of the fat book, and the content of the two versions of Cheng Ben itself is also extremely confusing after the rewriting.

Yan Zhai is a person who is well aware of the meaning, value, and importance of studying Cao Xueqin and "Dream of Red Mansions". His name was written directly into the Jiazhu book, and the early manuscripts were all inscribed as "The Records of the Stone of the Reappraisal of the Fat Yan Zhai";Cao Xueqin wrote, he commented, and commented again and again, three comments and four comments;In the first criticism of Jiaxu and Yasumoto, he was mentioned together with Xueqin, called "one celery and one fat" and "one fat and one celery". But who is the fat ink?

Whether it is uncle, uncle, Cao Fu, Tangcun, Cao Xueqin herself, or Shi Xiangyun, it is just a speculation, and it is a speculation with insufficient evidence. The same is true of Terata Wat. Because Yan Zhai can't find a belonging, Tewat also has no way to explore accordingly, and the two critics are linked.