Is there a real understanding? What is true understanding?

IMHO, and drilled into the horns, your question is inaccurate in the first place, because it doesn't make sense logically. "Is there a real understanding? ", first of all, to figure out what is"True understanding", and to figure it out, it is necessary to have an object of comparison, and this object is"True understanding", only will"Understand"with"True understanding"Comparison can determine people"Understand"Yes or no"True understanding".

So the question comes, and if it is yes, then it must be in the heart"True understanding", this in the heart of the person"True understanding", is with which"True understanding"What about the comparison? This leads to a circular argument; If it is negative, there are two reasons for negation: a, the one will"Understand"with"True understanding"After comparison, it is concluded that there is no real understanding.

Since there is one in the heart"True understanding"Again"There is no real understanding"The answer is contradictory. b, the comprehension, there is no way to compare understanding with real understanding, because there are countless kinds of understanding, which ones"Understand"for"True understanding"This? This remains with the other"True understanding"In contrast, this is a circular argument.

The above explanation is logical, and true understanding is a question that cannot be asked.

Of course, according to Marx's philosophical epistemology (reflection theory), correct understanding is that subjectivity and objectivity correspond. Let's take this understanding as understanding, right? Turning it into your question is asking, is there a real (correct) understanding?

According to Kant, we can only know things within our cognitive faculties, but we cannot know the true appearance of things. For example, if people all over the world are colorblind, then the world that colorblind sees is real, because when everyone is colorblind, they will never know how colorful the world is. Therefore, it cannot be denied that the world seen by color blindness is not real because you are not colorblind and the world you see is colorful, but ours"Cognitive ability"It determines that we can know the colorful world, and the cognitive ability of color blindness determines that color blindness can only know the world without color.

At this point, you should know that it is the cognitive ability of human beings that determines the way we know the world, not the way the world is. Therefore, the so-called true understanding of the world, the real understanding of the world, according to Kant, is not possible, because man's cognitive ability is limited.

According to the hermeneutic point of view, understanding is also subject to ourselves, and if we want to understand something, what is the tool or means of understanding? It's what we've learned, our cultural background, our national psychological structure, and so on, that we use to understand. Then the object of our understanding must be subject to ourselves, because without this we have no way to understand.

So, from a hermeneutical point of view, we are all understanding what we know. Then that"True understanding", perhaps only in this sense"True".

There is true understanding, and that is the confidant. The so-called confidant is hard to find, which tells us that it is difficult to want others to truly understand or truly understand others! That's why the ancients had a sigh that it was easy to get a thousand gold, and a confidant was hard to find!

From your addition, it is already known that you do not think that there is a true understanding. This thing,It's not fixed.,Sometimes it only exists for a moment.。。 Sometimes, you think that others understand you, but in fact you may misunderstand others.

Patience through the belly. There is no absolute understanding because everyone's personality and experience are different. The way of looking at things is definitely different.

Of course, there is, but ordinary people who want to do it can't do it, and they must completely let go of their own interests to truly understand others.

I used to be quite obsessed with "understanding", hoping that others would understand me or that I could understand others, and although I knew in my heart that there could be no real complete understanding, there was always such an impulse in my heart.

Later, I realized that we should not look at things from the perspective of "understanding", but should use "believing" or "not believing" to look at things anew, the Buddha's eyes are all Buddhas, and the eyes of thieves are all money, because each believes what they believe, if one person has a problem trusting another person, then it is futile to explain or hope to be understood, on the contrary, if you believe in the other person, that is, you can understand the other person without explanation, and the two are naturally very different.

I think what you are talking about is understanding rather than understanding, I think understanding is a must, you can know the cold and the hot, you can know the good and the bad, but there is a little bit of caution, care is messy, don't let yourself lose your direction because of anything, you have to", "no way" This is a sign of immaturity.

True maturity is not that you don't have heartache, but tears roll in your eyes, and you can talk and laugh.

What is true understanding? It's not sweet talk.

It's not a promise.

It is the trust between people and people.

It is understanding between the heart and the heart.

What is true understanding? It's patient listening in conversation.

It is sincere tolerance after a quarrel.

It is a voluntary apology after making a mistake.

It is a sincere response when you are accompanied.

Everyone wants to be understoodI don't want to say the bitterness, some people understand.

Invisible scars, someone hurts.

In times of grievance, give comfort.

When you are hurt, you are silently with you.

Sometimes

We'd rather be alone and silentI don't want to tell what is in my heart.

Because in the eyes of outsiders.

These grievances weigh on the bottom of our hearts.

It's all trivial and trivial.

Who comforts you? Who understands you?

I can't take care of my mood.

Sometimes I pay attention to you and care about you.

I saw things and people clearlyYou replaced the cry with silence.

You've turned your smile into a fake jujube pretend.

How many people are leaving.

It's because of misunderstanding and suspicion.

How many feelings fade.

It's because of conflicts and contradictions.

We are tired and tiredI want someone to understand me.

What exactly is understanding?

A sweet word? A hot lack of rock frank laughter?

Or a warm hug?

None of these.

The real understanding isYou know my sourness, even if I don't say it.

I know you're tired, though I didn't ask.

The real understanding isDon't be rude, don't be embarrassed, don't hold grudges, don't point.

Can tolerate, can agree, can trust, can feel distressed.

Understanding, bringing the heart and heart closer.

People get closer to each other.

In life, please understand each otherYou understand others, and others will understand youIf you embarrass others, others will embarrass youLearn to understandIt's not just about respecting others, it's about being kind to yourselfThe more you understand, the less you misunderstandFewer misunderstandings, more sincerityThe more sincere you are, the stronger your feelings are

In fact, real love is to miss each other, but people are not together, but hearts can be together, although I want to be together, but because of objective conditions, not together, but no one can do without anyone, I think this is called love.

Generally speaking, it refers to the existence of a certain phenomenon that is perceived by our human senses or confirmed by certain inspection and inspection standards (such as seeing and touching), and the opposite is non-existent. As it stands, or according to the current standards of testing and evaluation, everything that is material exists, and conversely, anything that is either material or immaterial, super-material (such as a pure vacuum or void) does not exist. Of course, with the further deepening of human understanding of the mysteries of nature, if the future scientific and technological testing standards also regard the void or vacuum of supermatter as or include it in the category of matter, matter will appear in the "state of both existence and non-existence" that you said!

In fact, even at present, any object is composed of two parts: "cosmic material (or matter)" and "space", and it is difficult to imagine how an object exists without a certain space. Pure space, on the other hand, is often perceived by our senses as non-existent. Thus, in this sense, it is true that everything at the present is "both present and non-existent".

In fact, real love is missing each other, but Tonglu people are not together, but their hearts can be together, although they want to be together, but because of objective conditions, they are not together, but no one can do without anyone, I think this is called love.

In fact, real love is missing each other, but Tonglu people are not together, but their hearts can be together, although they want to be together, but because of objective conditions, they are not together, but no one can do without anyone, I think this is called love.

In my opinion. Understanding is not only about thinking about the other person, but also about the other person.

When you really like someone, his world is your world, his business is your business, his experience is your experience, and his feelings are your feelings. You understand him because you feel that way.

Simply thinking about the other party is often misled by their own subjective emotions, but it is difficult to achieve, but they feel that the other party is very unreasonable.

When his world is your world, that's true understanding. You are like a man, and his joys and sorrows are your barometer. However, it will be a little tiring and there will be no regrets.

In fact, real love is to miss each other, but people are not together, but hearts can be together, although I want to be together, but because of objective conditions, not together, but no one can do without anyone, I think this is called love.

The word understanding literally means: to understand, to understand. In interpersonal communication, many times we don't understand it, but we don't know how to use it!

In fact, if you want to really understand him, you must first understand him, understand his personality, temperament, personality, what he likes and what he doesn't like. When you really understand him, you can really understand him.

From the perspective of others, it is to rely on the problem and relax the heart.

Think about the problem from the other party's point of view, don't always think that it is the other party's fault, and find your own fault.

The Enlightenment of the Heart 4: What is True Understanding?

Whether the so-called "reasonable" is the key issue is the understanding of this "reason". If we regard this "reason" not as an ethical "reason" but as a natural principle, then it is not difficult to understand that "existence is reasonable". The existence of all things, whether good or bad, always has its natural objective reason, and always conforms to and embodies the objective laws of nature.

All reality is reasonable. There is always an objective reason for the existence of something that exists. It may be that what exists may not be completely in line with social affairs, but it is certainly in line with the principles of nature.

There is always an objective reason for the current state of anything.

Everything in reality exists and is therefore reasonable. Everything in reality is changing, changing its own "real existence", until it is the fundamental negation of itself, which does not exist. Therefore, it can be said that the existence of reality has an irrational factor.

The real world (existence) is rational and unreasonable, it is the unity of existence and movement change, it is the unity of reason and irrationality.

Existence is the principle of heaven, there are existing rules of existence, and there are rules that change and change. Everything revolves around the rules.

Indeed, there is such a thing. Otherwise, they will perish or be destroyed.

There is a certain rationality for existence, because it will exist only if there are such soil and conditions.

Although existence is reasonable, we must distinguish what is reasonable and what is reasonable, and never do bad things.

What exists is reasonable, or why exists.