Which is better, CPU Core I3 or CPU Core E7500?

i3 is better. i3 is also a new product (32nm)...800 or so away.

The E7500 is far worse than the i3...The i3 is stronger than the E8400.

The i3 is dual-core 4-threaded (hyper-threaded).

The E7500 is an old product. It's also not convenient to upgrade later.

The i3 is an LGA1156 interface. There are better CPUs to upgrade in the future. Like all i5 series. i7 8xx columns. It's all upgradeable.

The i3 CPU also has a built-in memory controller. Performance has also been improved.

There are a lot of friends in QQ who are using i3. It's much stronger than the E columns.

Upstairs, I heard for the first time that i3 has two options: dual core and quad core, i3 is a physical dual core simulated into a logical quad-core through hyper-threading, go back and learn some knowledge again, don't mislead others.

Core i3 good. The Core i3 will be packaged with two cores, CPU + GPU, and the i3 is available in two options, dual core and quad core, while the Core E7500 is only dual core.

There is no doubt that the CPU is always the most expensive good. However, the matching motherboard may also be more expensive.

This price point is indeed AMD's best value for money. But the i3 530 is definitely better than the E7500, but the i3 530 requires an H55 or P55 motherboard, which is more expensive, and the motherboard that the E7500 needs to be equipped with is relatively cheaper.

i3 530 and Core E75000, to i3 good, high frequency, low power consumption. If you don't think it's a good deal, then buy AMD's quad-core

i3 dual-core 4 threads, equivalent to analog 4 cores, E7500 dual-core, i3 is definitely stronger than E7500, and it is a 32nm process.

<>2, E7400 is LGA 775 interface, ASUS P8H61 is LGA 1155 interface, it can't be matched, so it can't be used;

The i3-2120 is an LGA 1155 interface and the GIGABYTE P43 is an LGA 775 interface, which cannot be matched.

Only i3 2120 with ASUS P8H61, E7400 with Gigabyte P43.

Of course, it's i3 good,Because i3There is an extra display unit on it,For the display above,CPU will allocate a certain amount of information to him,E7400There is no such function,

1.In terms of CPU data alone, it is clear that the i3-2120 is better. However, the actual processing speed of the CPU is not based on the data of the CPU alone, and other hardware in the chassis will also affect the performance of the CPU. It is not possible to make actual comparisons.

The i3-2120 should use a 1155 motherboard. The 775 is a contact type, the CPU is flat underneath, and there is a protrusion in the middle, and the 1155 is a pin type, and the bottom is full of pins, and it cannot be accessed when it is replaced.

1. What grade do you care about him, it depends on what you use, this you can meet your requirements, it is the best to meet your requirements, and if you can't meet your requirements, do you use your money?

2. This idea of yours will be extinguished, it can't.

i3It's better.,About 20-30%Look.,This is the evaluation result.,Blowing a bigger component,It's not worth changing the platform with poor performance.,To change it1155,At least it's also i5、i7。

i3 cannot be used with p43.

Of course, it's i3 good,Because i3There is an extra display unit on it,For the display above,CPU will allocate a certain amount of information to him,E7400There is no such function,

Landlord,I don't particularly understand your intentions,Because the two CPUs correspond to different fields,The former is a notebook product,The latter is a desktop level。

However, in terms of absolute performance, the E6500 is slightly better by about 5%. The reason is simple, the Core i3 2310M adopts the SNB architecture, and the performance is significantly improved compared to the previous generation Core i3 330M. Therefore, it can achieve the performance of the previous generation Core i3 with the main frequency, which is slightly better than the Core i3 350M.

The performance of the Core i3 350M is significantly improved compared to the Core processor, and the main frequency can reach the performance of the previous generation. That is, it is stronger than the P8800 level processor.

The E6500 and P8800 are basically the same at the microarchitectural level. So you know.

Due to the huge advantages of the microarchitecture, the Core i3 2310M can achieve the performance of the previous generation of very high frequency processors at a lower frequency, which is roughly equal to the performance of the desktop Pentium dual-core frequency. That is, the performance is similar to that of the E6300. It is slightly inferior to the E6500 with a high frequency of the main frequency

It is a disadvantage in most tests of daily applications.

However, the Core i3 2310M can surpass most desktop 65W processors with 35W of power, which is indeed commendable.

Needless to say? I3 for sure.

The E6500 is Intel's previous-generation architecture CPU

The i3 is the new 32nm CPU

The performance of the i3 is good (extremely limited, generally not felt), and the stability of the e6500 is better.

The i3 2310M is better, with an advanced architecture and stronger performance.

The i3 2310M, E6500 is already a very old product.