When two tigers fight, one must be injured 20

It is used to describe two people or groups with the same power, vicious competition or confrontation with each other, and one of them will suffer heavier losses.

The key points are:1. The balance of forces, not much difference, 2. One will hurt.

So I didn't say: If the sheep and the tiger fight, there will be an injury, hehe.

The husband is not fighting, so the world can not fight with it.

Indisputability is based on contention as the condition, contention as the background, and contention as the essence.

There must be an injury (injured but not dead), natural selection, superior and inferior, able to fight well, strict strategy to achieve win-win harmony.

It is the fundamental law of nature.

It's simple. Both countries still atomic bombs each other, and if they win, they will almost die.

Parable: When two strong men fight each other, one of them must suffer serious damage. Idiom source: Ming Xu Yuan's "Eight Meanings: Zhang Wei's Commentary":

I don't know why, as long as I fight with Zhao Zhengqing, the doctor, I think that if the two tigers fight, there will be an injury and a bad respect. ”

When two tigers fight, there must be one injury: When two tigers fight, there must be one injury "Warring States Policy: Qin Ce II": "The king doesn't hear what his husband cares about? There are two tigers who slander people and are angry, and Guan Zhuangzi will stab them. The source section of the pipe and the stop: 'Tiger.

Idiom grammar: as object, definite, clause; Used to get things done.

When two tigers fight, one will be injured" Translation: Bian Zhuangzi wanted to assassinate the tiger, but the child servant in the hotel stopped him and said: "Two tigers are about to eat a cow, and they will fight with each other because of the sweet taste of the meat, and if they fight, they will definitely fight, and after the fight, the strong will be injured and the weak will die."

Again) stabbing and wounding tigers, one operation has the reputation of killing two tigers. ”

Bian Zhuangzi also thought so, so he stood and waited. After a while, the two tigers fought, the strong one was wounded, and the weak one died. Bian Zhuangzi assassinated the wounded tiger, and he could kill two tigers with only one attack.

Two tigers fighting, there must be an injury", the original text: Zhuangzi wants to stab the tiger, the pavilion erects to stop, saying: "The two tigers eat cattle, eat sweet, fight will fight, fight will be big, small will die."

From the wound to the stab, there will be the name of the double tiger in one fell swoop. Bian Zhuangzi thought so, and immediately mustered it. There is a moment, calling the two tigers to fight, the big one is injured, and the small one dies.

Zhuangzi stabbed him from the wounded, and in one fell swoop, he had two tigers to do bad work.

When two tigers fight, there must be an injury": the reason why Bian Zhuangzi was able to get two tigers at one time was because he took advantage of the contradiction between the two tigers and chose the right time to act purely in the chain, so he had the effect of getting twice the result with half the effort. It shows that you can't do things blindly, you must be outwitted, and you must have a plan to do it in a targeted manner.