What is the difference between The Biography of Meng Weijun in Historical Records and Wang Anshi s

The Biography of Meng Weijun is a story from ancient Chinese history that involves different perspectives and interpretations. Let's take a look at the question of whether the view on the relationship between Meng Weijun and Wang Anshi is correct.

First of all, on the question of whether Meng Weijun was a traitor, some people think that Wei Wei was a traitor because he betrayed his country and helped Qin destroy Zhao. However, from another point of view, Meng Weijun's approach at that time may have been to achieve the unification of the country, Qin was a stronger country for him, and Qin treated him more seriously and respectfully, so he made this choice. In the historical context of the time, this choice may not have been entirely wrong.

Second, Wang Anshi was seen as an incompetent bureaucrat whose policies led to peasant revolt and social instability. However, we can look at this issue from another perspective. Wang's new policy has always been controversial, but in any case, he is a man who can do his best to implement his policies.

He tried to introduce a series of reform measures to solve the economic problems of the time, especially the problem of rural poverty. Although it is true that there are some unsatisfactory policies, some of his selfless reforms have brought about substantial changes.

Finally, as for the relationship between Meng and Wang Anshi, some people believe that Meng Yanjun supported some of Wang Anshi's policies, but this view needs to be further supplemented and confirmed. In history, Meng Weijun and Wang Anshi may not have had direct contact and interaction, and this statement may only be speculation and speculation by later generations. Therefore, we need to be more rigorous and objective when discussing this issue.

In general, the historical background and political environment are complex, and we need to understand and interpret historical events from different perspectives in order to set the record straight. In response to the views of Meng Weijun and Wang Anshi, we need to look at the problem more objectively and avoid jumping to conclusions prematurely.

Wang Anshi's "Reading the Biography of Meng Weijun" is a short and concise article. After Wang Anshi read "Historical Records: The Biography of Meng Weijun", he wrote a post-reading feeling, that is, the prestigious "Reading the Biography of Meng Weijun", the full text is as follows:

The world said that Meng Weijun can get a soldier, and the scholar will return to it, and rely on his strength to get rid of the Qin of the tiger and leopard. Whew! Meng tastes the male ears of the rooster and the dog thief, how can it be enough to speak of a scholar?

Otherwise, if you are good at Qi, you will have a soldier, and you should be able to control Qin in the south, so why take the power of chickens and dogs? The husband and the dog are out of the door, and the reason why this man is not there.

That's it for the full article. Here Wang Anshi put forward the standard of "taxi". According to this standard, Meng Weijun is only the best among the kind of chicken and dog thieves, and the customers he raises are all chicken and dog thieves. Perhaps this comment is more appropriate.

Obviously, Wang Anshi is too personal heroic. Outstanding talents are of course important, but they may not be as he said, "If you are good at Qi, you will have a soldier, and you should be able to control Qin in the south." The six countries were unified by the Qin state, didn't the six countries make full use of their talents?

Qin State implements the strategy of distant friendship and close attack, each of which is broken and finally unified, such a strategy, even if Qi uses the best talents, there is not much chance of winning, let alone saying that "it is advisable to control Qin from the south".

Zhuge Liang can be described as a talent. When Cao Wei was busy defending Eastern Wu, he was still unable to capture Longyou, and even several Northern Expeditions were frustrated. It can be seen that with excellent talents, there may not be much chance of winning.

Let's talk about Wang Anshi himself. Isn't he the best talent of this kind? But what about his reforms?

Isn't it anticlimactic and struggling? It can be seen that talent is important, but it should not be too personal heroism. The role of the masses should be brought into play.

For example, Obama came to power, and did Americans pin all their hopes on Obama? Definitely! Americans will still pin their hopes primarily on organizations such as Congress.

Wang Anshi's point of view in this article also has merit. That's what he said, "The husband and the dog are out of the door, and the reason why this man is not there." Perhaps this is true.

Let's just say that all kinds of official experts learn to organize. The husband and the dog are out of the door, and the reason why this man is not there. At present, the quality of those experts who eat official meals is generally poor.

Economists remember the market economy; The writer memorizes the words; Journalists know hush money; Historians know "materialism"; The professor knows "liberalism"; Wait a minute. Why? The husband and the dog are out of the door, and the reason why this man is not there. ”