Legally speaking, does a son in law have an obligation to support his father in law and mother in la

1. There is no obligation to support your parents-in-law.

2. The obligation of maintenance under the laws of our country is based on the relationship between biological parents and children and the relationship of adoption or the formation of a relationship of support by stepchildren.

3. You are in charge of your business, and you have no legal obligation.

Article 21 of the Marriage Law stipulates that parents have the obligation to raise and educate their children; Children have an obligation to support their parents.

However, the relationship between the son-in-law and the parents-in-law is not the parent-child relationship formed by blood as stated in the Marriage Law, so there is no legal obligation to support.

However, the daughter has it.

Beijing professional marriage lawyer warm reminder: according to the law, the son-in-law does not have the legal obligation to support the father-in-law and mother-in-law, whether to support the parents-in-law depends on the personal moral quality, but the law gives the widowed daughter-in-law to the in-laws, the widowed son-in-law to the parents-in-law, the right to be the first order of heirs.

Parents who fail to fulfill their obligation to support their adult children, or who lack the ability to work or who have difficulties in living, have the right to demand maintenance from their adult children. The main content of maintenance and support means that under the existing economic and social conditions, children should financially provide their parents with necessary daily necessities and expenses, and should respect, care and take care of their parents in life, spiritually and emotionally.

Adult children who can afford it, regardless of gender, married or unmarried, shall make every effort in accordance with the law to fulfil this obligation until the death of their parents when their parents need support.

The obligation of a child to support his or her parents occurs not only between a legitimate child and his or her parents, but also between an illegitimate child and his or her biological parents, between an adopted child and his or her adoptive parents, and between a stepchild and a stepparent who has fulfilled the obligation of support and education.

[Legal basis].Civil Code

Article 1129:Where a widowed daughter-in-law has fulfilled the primary obligation of support to her parents-in-law, or a widowed son-in-law has fulfilled her primary obligation to support her parents-in-law, she is to be the first-order heir.

Article 1130:The share of inheritance inherited by heirs in the same order shall generally be equal.

Heirs who have special difficulties in living and lack the ability to work shall be taken care of when distributing the inheritance.

Heirs who have fulfilled the main obligation to support the decedent or who live with the decedent may receive more than one share of the inheritance when the inheritance is distributed.

If an heir who has the ability and the capacity to support does not fulfill his obligation to support, the inheritance shall be distributed without or less.

Where the heirs agree through consultation, it may also be unequal.

Article 1074:Grandparents who can afford it have an obligation to support their minor grandchildren whose parents have died or whose parents are unable to support them.

Grandchildren who can afford it have the obligation to support their grandparents who have died or whose children are unable to support them.

A daughter-in-law has no legal obligation to support her parents-in-law and a son-in-law to her parents-in-law.

Although the relationship between the in-laws and the daughter-in-law, and between the parents-in-law He Yun and the son-in-law is proportionate to the relationship between parents and children, it is not a legal parent-child relationship, and does not have the rights and obligations between parents and children. Therefore, the daughter-in-law has no legal obligation to support her in-laws and the son-in-law to her parents-in-law.

In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of the Marriage Law, children have the obligation to support their parents, and parents who fail to perform their obligations, are unable to work or have difficulties in living have the right to demand alimony from their children.

From the above legal provisions, it can be seen that the obligation to support is borne by the children, after the formation of a family due to marriage, such a relationship has not changed, the children only have the obligation to support the parents of the children, the daughter-in-law has no obligation to support the parents-in-law, and the son-in-law has no obligation to support the parents-in-law, but since the two parties are married, the expenses of the parents who support themselves are generally the joint property of the husband and wife, and one party has no right to interfere with the reasonable expenses of supporting the parents.

Neither sons-in-law nor daughters-in-law have a legal obligation to support their parents-in-law and in-laws, but it is both legal and moral that they should assist their spouses in supporting their parents.

The Marriage Law stipulates that "children have the obligation to support their parents. "When a child fails to fulfill his or her maintenance obligations, parents who are unable to work or have difficulties in living have the right to demand maintenance from their children.

Children here include children born out of wedlock, adopted children, and stepchildren with a dependent relationship, but not sons-in-law and daughters-in-law, that is, the law does not stipulate that the son-in-law has an obligation to support his father-in-law. Supporting the elderly is a traditional virtue of the Chinese nation. It is also the legal obligation of the child, and maintenance refers to the child's support for the parents, that is, to provide the necessary living expenses and conditions for the parents materially and economically.

Although the Law on the Protection of the Rights and Interests of the Elderly stipulates that the spouse of the supporter shall assist the supporter in fulfilling the obligation of support. However, the obligation to assist is not an obligation to support.

Not exactly, there is no such obligation. But his daughter has this obligation. Of course, there are also inheritance rights.

This is a tricky question because everyone may have a different perspective on the issue. Generally speaking, in traditional Chinese culture, the son-in-law has a very deep relationship with the parents-in-law, and the son-in-law needs to support the parents-in-law. This relationship is not only reflected in the family relationship, but also in the traditional values of male superiority and inferiority.

In particular, asking the son-in-law to buy some things or pay some expenses to support his parents-in-law is actually a manifestation of the values of male superiority and inferiority of women.

However, some scholars believe that compared with the development concept of modern society, the traditional values of male superiority and inferiority of women are no longer recognized by mainstream society. They declared that a son-in-law should not have a pre-obligation to support his parents-in-law. Allowing a son-in-law to support his parents-in-law makes this traditional value obsolete and hinders social progress, which is the firm view of many new generations.

In any case, the law is the cornerstone of social development, so it does not violate the values of today's society, so the law does not mandate that the son-in-law has an obligation to support his parents-in-law. If anything, it is only a provision for the obligation of the son to take care of his parents, not for the son-in-law, so it does not completely put the son-in-law in a weaker position.

In a general sense, on the one hand, we should respect traditional values, and at the same time, we should accept the new developments of modern society. On the one hand, we need to insist that sons have responsibilities to their parents, including taking responsibility for their parents, caring for them, and respecting their requirements. On the other hand, these responsibilities also include women, especially sons-in-law. Although the law does not know that the son-in-law has the obligation to support, in the traditional culture and code of conduct, there is still a deep affection between the son-in-law and the parents-in-law, and when there is a certain economic gap between them, the son-in-law should still bear a certain amount of care work.

In conclusion, whether a son-in-law has an obligation to support his parents-in-law is a complex issue because it involves many aspects, such as the law, the simplification of traditional texts, and the concept of social development. The pros and cons of each aspect must be considered before making a proper judgment. As long as the son-in-law respects the parents-in-law and deals with them responsibly, even whether there is a maintenance obligation or not, as long as he does his duty, then the parents-in-law will be quite satisfied with their son-in-law.