What do you think about the three child policy now?

Families who are willing to have three children, and can afford to raise them, can have children, which is exactly in line with the national policy. If you don't want to have three children, don't force yourself too much. Personally, I think that the policy of having three children can be implemented, provided that the housewife is financially secure.

The birth rate of newborns is lower than in previous years, and the problem of "low birthrate and aging population" is more serious, so some experts recommend that people have three children. When the second child was introduced, some people said that they didn't want a second child. However, there are also many families who gradually have a second child.

Now that the three-child policy is being implemented, it is estimated that a small number of families will have three children, after all, families who want children, have the ability, energy and money still exist. But most families don't want to have a third child anymore because families with one or even two children are exhausted. If most families want to have a second or third child, this needs to be solved from the root.

For example, the status of women in the economy and in the family, and the education of children. If you give birth to three children, in an ordinary family, your mother may not have to go to work for the rest of her life and will always take care of her children. All the expenses of the family are all counting on the income of the father alone, which is very stressful, and the children's milk powder, diaper expenses, food and clothing and other expenses are accumulated in a year, which is indeed a lot of expenses.

It's fine if the child doesn't get sick, otherwise you can't afford the expensive medical bills. A child's education requires an adult to be fully committed and responsible, and most families put this burden on their mothers. Without the help of the elderly, the second child is not daring to use, and the mother has to pick up and drop off the child to school, and she has to rush to work, work all day, and come back at night to help the child with homework.

Mothers who stay at home full-time should be given more protection. For example, social security contributions, or jobs that can provide convenient transportation for children to and from school. In this way, full-time mothers will have no worries and will be more willing to have children.

The liberalization of the three-child policy shows that China's population has declined, and secondly, if you really want to have three children, first consider the current economic situation of the family, and combine the economic foundation to decide whether to have three children. If the economy allows, yes.

Now the three-child policy is liberalized, which shows that China is entering an aging society, in order to increase the birth rate of the population, so the state has liberalized the three-child policy, which is conducive to optimizing the population structure.

The liberalization of the three-child policy is mainly to promote population development, and I feel that as long as there are conditions, you can have three children, and if you don't have conditions, don't have children.

This depends on each person's different family situation, if there is no financial problem, and there is a family to help, it is possible to consider having three children.

China's population is aging seriously, and the birth rate needs to be increased, but the current life pressure is too great, so the fertility willingness is very low.

The policy must be adjusted according to the country's population, but now it is too expensive to raise children, and there must be many difficulties in the implementation of the policy.

Even if you let go of the third child, you have to see if you have such financial strength, and now the cost of children's education is a big expense for a family.

The three-child policy, those who have money don't want to have children, those who want to have no money, for ordinary families, today's society is almost the same as raising a child, and the second child can only be a person with a relatively high economy and a more enlightened concept, let alone a third child. After all, at the same time, the price of **, wages did not follow the same**, ten yuan ten years ago and today's ten yuan play a very different role, the times are developing, society is progressing, but wages are still ordinary snails climbing.

Three-child policy. There is a certain degree of strategy and rationality.

It can alleviate the aging of the population.

to improve the demographic structure and achieve age balance. Secondly, people are the main body of social development and can achieve a demographic dividend.

Finally, fertility can be slowed.

Downward trend.

Therefore, good policies should be well promoted, and the old and new policies should be well connected. Reduce the cost of childbirth, ensure women's employment, protect the rights of women and children, improve reproductive assistance technology, and improve maternity leave.

system, etc. There are probably two groups of people who will choose to respond to the policy. The first is the economic foundation.

Strong people, because no other factors are taken into account at all. The second is an only child, because there are parents who can help take care of the children, they can go to work to earn money to raise the children. However, in the final analysis, the only child also belongs to the category of people with a good economic foundation, but the economic strength is slightly weaker.

And in all the links, we often ignore the other most important person in Bichajin, that is, the lover, the wife, the wife.

The implementation of the "three-child policy" is out of the overall situation of the population, which is a good thing and should be advocated. The corresponding measures should also be accelerated, such as ensuring that women of childbearing age are not dismissed due to childbirth, increasing male escort leave, and increasing the three-child policy.

Support and appropriately favor the welfare of mothers with three children, and the whole society cares about the marriage of young people.

Fully liberalize the three-child policy. But everyone is becoming more and more rational, and those who want to give birth have to carefully weigh the money in their bags, as well as the parents with children and their own energy, it is estimated that there will not be many people who pay for the savings action, let's wait and see.

In the context of high housing prices and childcare costs, it is unrealistic to have three children! To solve the aging of the population, in fact, in order to stimulate the economy and solve the problem of social security, in this regard, there is not only one way to solve the tactics of crowds, from the number of people to turn.

The quality of the population can also stimulate the economy and solve the problem of social security.

For example, 10 people who touch the rough strength of imbecile pants may only contribute 1 million to GDP, but 1 person with high ability may laugh and talk about creating 1 million GDP, the same effect.

Therefore, the focus should be on a comprehensive reform from early childhood to university, which is the fundamental solution to economic development. It is not advisable to blindly emphasize the number of people and hope for the demographic dividend.

Legal analysis: The three-child policy is conducive to improving China's population structure, implementing the national strategy of actively responding to population aging, and maintaining the advantages of China's human resource endowment.

In November 2016, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences released a report saying that from the current data, after the full release of the second child, the domestic birth rate is far from meeting expectations, so it is imperative to continue to implement a relaxed birth policy. The report also stresses that the comprehensive second child is not the end of the family planning policy.

The All-China Women's Federation released statistics showing that only 26% of women are willing to have a second child after the full release of the second child. Previously, the All-China Women's Federation released the latest survey report through **, which said that among the respondents, only one of them had the intention of having a second child, and the number of people who clearly stated that they would not have a second child was as high. Jane excited.

Legal basis: "Decision on Optimizing the Fertility Policy to Promote the Long-term Balanced Development of the Population" 1. Fully understand the great significance of optimizing the fertility policy and promoting the long-term balanced development of the population (1) It is conducive to improving the population structure and implementing the national strategy of actively responding to the aging of the population. Aging is a global population development trend and a major challenge to China's development.

It is expected that during the "14th Five-Year Plan" period, China's population will enter a stage of moderate aging, and will enter a stage of severe aging around 2035, which will have a far-reaching impact on the whole field of economic operation, all aspects of social construction, and social and cultural aspects. The implementation of the three-child policy and hail as a set of support measures are conducive to unleashing fertility potential, slowing down the aging process of the population, promoting intergenerational harmony, and enhancing the overall vitality of society.

Netizens said: I don't want to give birth at all, one is enough to worry about, and if you give birth to three children, do you want your whole family to drink the northwest wind?

Some netizens even directly gave specific suggestions: 1 million rewards for giving birth to a child, 2 million rewards for giving birth to a second child, 3 million rewards for giving birth to a third child, a direct reward house for giving birth to 4-5 children, plus free fees for children from kindergarten to high school.

If it is just an ordinary community kindergarten, and the junior high school and high school are all public, then the tuition fee is naturally acceptable. However, there are now nine years of compulsory education from primary school to junior high school, and all that needs to be paid is the cost of kindergarten and high school.

So, the problem is not at all about these costs, after all, raising a child requires more than just a small part of the tuition fee.

Even if you completely let go of childbearing, and give birth to three or four children at will, you must always start with one child and two children.

And the biggest problem now is not the lack of people who have three or four children, but in today's environment of "late marriage and late childbearing", many people in the tourism bureau mausoleum don't even want to have one child, how to talk about three and four children?

Therefore, if you want people to have more children, you must first do a good job in the service of the first child, and you should give subsidies to subsidies, and provide educational assistance when you should provide educational assistance.

Shou Lasanxian, the expenditure on raising children in the cost of education, that is, the first place without suspense, is the most invested in raising children, and occupies a large proportion of the cost of raising a baby.

If this large fee is canceled, for parents, a large part of the cost of raising a baby will be reduced.

Just imagine, if a child from kindergarten to university, all the cost of education expenses are contracted by the state, then for most children from ordinary families, their growth will be guaranteed.

Therefore, only if the parents of the first child feel that raising a child is not a very uncomfortable thing, easy to give birth, easy to raise, and can afford to raise, then naturally more people will be willing to try to have more.

It is not difficult to have a child, but how to raise a child until he graduates from college is the most difficult, and it takes a huge cost to pay for more than 20 years.