The high speed rail man s refusal to give way to passengers has caused heated discussions, what is g

Here's how it happened, this oneThe man sat in the middle of the three seats on the high-speed train, and he put his luggage in the middle of the aisle. The female passenger repeatedly reminded the man to let him move his luggage, but the man would go back, saying that he had no obligation to serve others

This kind of thing really makes people feel incredible, sure enough, the forest is big, there are all kinds of birds, even if the living standard is getting better and better, and our country is developing faster and faster, there are still these people who have no quality. This man's approach is typical of hurting others and not benefiting himself, and he is very selfish, his luggage blocks the way of others, but he does not move away, and he has a good word, such a person should have no friends in life, and it will definitely not be very good, because no one wants to cooperate with such a person. Although this man has no obligation to serve others, his actions have seriously affected others and are equivalent to violating the provisions of the Civil Code.

However, it seems that it is useless to discuss the civil code with such a person, after all, such scoundrels will not listen to others. When encountering such a thing, the best solution is to ask the staff on the high-speed rail for help, don't get too entangled with him, you must understand the truth, that is, in this kind of public place, you can never be alone, there will be a lot of enthusiastic people to come to help. There used to be a saying, don't get entangled with garbage, that's what you say.

If this man also treats others with such an attitude in society, sooner or later he will suffer a big loss, I hope this man can get the lesson he deserves and stop being such a scoundrel.

The high-speed rail is divided into two rows, one row of three seats and one row of two seats. The man sat in the middle of the three rows, and the woman had to go to the inner seat, but the man was reluctant to give way, saying that he was not obligated to make way for the woman.

That's right, the man's suitcase was placed in the public area to block the way, and a woman wanted to sit by the window and let her move the luggage but was angry, saying I have no obligation to serve you, and it has to be like this to solve things that can be solved with one action, and now there are really all kinds of people.

The man on the high-speed rail refused to give way to the passengers, which caused a lot of heated discussions, in fact, the man refused to give up his seat, refused to let the passenger next to him walk in, and a person occupied the public aisle, which is illegal.

This man is a mentally unsound person, there are three positions in total, he sits in the middle, and the passengers inside want to go in and let him let go, he deliberately makes it difficult and says I won't let you, you find a way to get in yourself.

This man's position on the high-speed rail is by the aisle, and then there is a passenger by the window, and the passenger wants to go in, but the man doesn't give way, so this kind of man really has no quality.

Recently, there was an alternative high-speed rail hegemony incident in Suqian, Jiangsu, from the ****, it was seen from the **** that the man sitting in the middle position put his luggage at his feet, and the small table was also put down, refusing to give up his seat for the female passenger sitting by the window, after the female passenger asked twice, the man directly said: The female passenger has a problem with IQ, he has no obligation to make way for her, and how the female passenger gets in has nothing to do with him. <>

There are two voices on the Internet, and some netizens said that it is because of the bad attitude of female passengers at the beginning that men will be like this. But please think about it calmly, this ** was definitely not filmed from the beginning, because who knew that this would happen in the first place? The reason why ** is recorded must be because things have developed to the point where we see contradictions.

As a result of the follow-up process, the police changed the seat of the female passenger. This result made netizens very angry, why are always kind people bullied and compromised, and people like the overlord man are left alone? <>

I think the man's behavior is very infuriating and unreasonable. To be able to justifiably say that there is no obligation to give in to others is obviously a matter of moral quality, typical selfishness and self-centeredness. But what he didn't know was that he also had no right to prevent others from entering his position, so his behavior could be called an alternative hegemony, and his refusal to give way and insulting female passengers had violated the law on the administration of public order and was a deliberate disturbance of public order and personal assault.

Although the police intervened in the matter, the result was not satisfactory, and it ended with the female passenger being replaced. So far, a few days have passed, and there has been no punishment for the man's refusal to give way, only the Propaganda Department of the China Railway Administration has issued a statement that the matter will be handed over to the railway public security management department. <>

In the future, when we encounter this kind of thing and cannot solve it ourselves, we need to notify the flight attendant or the police to intervene, so as not to conflict with the other party and avoid unnecessary injury. However, for the follow-up development of this matter, the public has questioned whether the railway public security management department has implemented the punishment for such hegemonic behavior? Has the provision for entering the list of dishonest persons been enforced?

Because hegemony happens repeatedly, if the previous punishment is put in place, it will sound a wake-up call for those who come behind. But obviously, there was no previous report on the results of the high-speed rail hegemony, which will reduce the credibility of the railway public security management department. Finally, I hope to wait for the happy result, from refusing to give up your seat to refusing to give way, which is enough to attract people's attention, the railway public security management department should strictly enforce the law, individual rights must not override the public interest, and can increase the prohibition of ticket purchase.

It is hoped that the social atmosphere will become better and better, and the quality of the people will become higher and higher.

Nowadays, many people will choose high-speed rail for travel, which is very convenient, fast, and has a good passenger experience. Anyone who has sat in it knows that high-speed rail has a window and an aisle. Recently, there was such an incident in Suqian, Jiangsu, where a passenger in the aisle refused to give way to the inside passengers, and said "Do I have an obligation to serve you?"

After this incident was on the Internet, it caused heated discussions among many netizens. Everyone is complaining that this is not a question of obligation, but a matter of personal quality. So what should you do when you encounter this situation in the future?

Let me tell you what I think! <>

First of all, when we encounter such a problem, don't conflict with the other party, if you quarrel with him at this time, it will also lower your own pattern. This kind of person who is unwilling to give way to the inside passenger is also more selfish, and when you encounter such a person, you should tell the staff and let them deal with it. There are attendants on the high-speed rail, and if the attendants can't solve it, they can let the public security department deal with it.

If you fight him, both of you will be punished in the end, and you will lose money, so it's not worth it!

High-speed rail is a public place, although it is not your obligation to give way to others, but to a certain extent, it also reflects personal quality and education! We can also reason with him first, but we also have to pay attention to our attitude, if you show a haughty attitude, then people will not want to give way. <>

In fact, there have been such things that have happened before, that is, others sit in a disorderly position and do not give up their seats in the end, which is very common. The Chinese nation has always possessed fine traditional virtues, and this virtue cannot be lost in our generation. As a parent, you must also tell your child what to do in public to show your upbringing!

The above is the opinion, when encountering this kind of thing, we should discuss with the staff in time and let them deal with it. Remember not to get into conflict with the other person. We must have certain basic qualities in public, so that others will not look down on them!

Do you think so?

When encountering this situation, you should tell the other party to give up your seat, this kind of behavior is wrong, and it is a serious immoral practice that has violated the bottom line, so you can't condone such people to do whatever they want, and you should resist the other party.

In this case, don't rush into conflict with him, you can ask the conductor for help. Because it's all about morality.

The man on the high-speed rail refused to give way to the passengers in the inner seats, and in this case, he should contact the staff on the train to solve the problem, so as to ensure that his interests are not violated.

The behavior of the high-speed rail man refusing to give way to passengers is wrong, it is fate to be able to take a high-speed rail, and it is even more fate to sit next to it, and they should help each other, not give way, and have disputes.

This man is too immoral, his luggage should not have been placed in the aisle, he is selfish, and he is probably not a popular person in his own unit.

This behavior is not right, there is nothing wrong with everyone being polite, high-speed rail is a public place, and it is convenient for others to be convenient for yourself.

The quality of this man needs to be improved, a big man makes such a move, it is really too small, it is originally a public place, and people buy tickets, and not giving way to others is playing a scoundrel in disguise.

I think his behavior is too immoral, and he is still a lawyer, and he has no morality at all.

ThisThe man is definitely a selfish person who often likes to do things that are harmful to others and not to himself

Here's how it happened, the man happened to sit in the empty seat in the middle of the three positions when he took the high-speed train, and the female passenger was sitting by the window, but the man piled his luggage in the aisle, and after the female passenger repeatedly reminded him, the man instead of moving the luggage, he replied: I have no obligation to serve you. This sentence really makes people feel incredible, this man does have the right to leave his luggage here, but his behavior also harms the legitimate rights and interests of others, and if it is serious, it has violated the law.

Article 132 of the Civil Code reads as follows:Civil subjects may not abuse their civil rights to harm the interests of the state, the public interest and the legitimate rights and interests of others。And this man is clearly violating this law. However, in real life, it is no longer useful to encounter this kind of scoundrel quoting the Civil Code, so you should calm down first, after all, you are standing on the commanding heights, and there is no need to lower your status to argue with him.

The best way is to find the staff next to you, or to mobilize the crowd next to you. After all, in this kind of public place, you will never be alone, and the staff will come over in time to help you solve this problem, rather than arguing with the other party yourself, it is better to leave it to someone else to solve.

However, this man is too selfish, this kind of behavior is completely harmful to others and not to himself, I believe that he must not be good in real life, after all, it should be a very difficult thing for a man in this pattern to develop well. No one wants to associate with such a person, even if you don't recognize it clearly at first, after you get acquainted with it, you will not continue to contact such a person. Because if you come into contact with such a person for a long time, you are likely to damage your own interests.

This is an extremely unqualified behavior, this is a lack of morality, there is no sense of public morality, this kind of refusal to give way, affecting the passage of high-speed rail, suspected of disrupting the operation order of high-speed rail, to be punished by public security.

I find this man's behavior very incomprehensible. In today's society, we must learn to help each other and respect each other when we go out, instead of being so impolite. The man's behavior shows us that he is not of high quality and has low morals.

This kind of behavior is very unqualified. It is natural to give way to those who sit inside, and to refuse to give way is a lack of public morality.

1. Pay attention to information.

On the high-speed rail, the woman's seat was inside, the man's seat was outside, and the man's dining table and luggage blocked the woman's way, and she couldn't get over, so she politely asked the man to let go. But the man saidAm I obligated to serve you?

2. Precautions for taking high-speed rail

Passengers should pay attention to the quality of high-speed rail, do not litter fruit peels, and take the initiative to make way for others. Hit**, listen**Don't affect others, after all, it's easy to go out, be more considerate of others, help others, give people roses, and leave a lingering fragrance on your hands.

High-speed rail should also strengthen the management of passengers, stop uncivilized behaviors in a timely manner, and punish some illegal behaviors.

3. Improve quality and be a civilized citizen

It is necessary to grasp the improvement of the quality of residents as a long-term task, adopt innovative work methods and methods to carry out propaganda, and let moral education take root in the hearts of the people. School education is the key, and schools should put students' moral education in an important position, regularly carry out ideological education classes, and cultivate children's correct outlook on life and values.

I suggest that some uncivilized behaviors should be included in the law for punishment, such as littering, spitting, vandalism, swearing, etc.

For some civilized behaviors, it should be included in the points management system, and those who reach a certain score can be rewarded from employment and loans, which is also a recognition of civilization.

I believe that with everyone's efforts, our society will be more harmonious and beautiful!