-
In modern society, each of us may not care about the relationship very much, even if we enter a marriage, we will not deliberately wronged ourselves and maintain a relationship. With such thoughts, many marriages will become fragmented, and there will be no sweetness and happiness for two people in marriage, only pain and helplessness. It is precisely because of this that the divorce rate in the current society is made.
Very high. Sometimes, however, a person may go to the expense of a broken marriage for the sake of their children. So what about whether or not to maintain a broken marriage for the sake of children? Here's what I think:
1. You should not maintain a broken marriage for the sake of your children.
Because the marriage is one's own, although it has a certain relationship with the children, it does not occupy the main relationship. In a marriage, if we feel unhappy ourselves, we feel full of conflicts with our husbands. Then we don't need to maintain such a marriage for the sake of our children, and we shouldn't maintain a broken marriage for the sake of our children.
Second, children living in a discordant family can cause more harm than their parents' divorce.
In fact, compared with the divorce of parents, allowing children to live in a discordant family environment for a long time is more harmful to children. A discordant home environment can make a child extremely sensitive and also make a child's mental health.
Something went wrong. <>
3. When facing an unhappy marriage, I hope everyone can be brave enough to divorce.
An unhappy marriage is very painful for each of us. Therefore, I hope that when facing an unhappy marriage, everyone can be brave enough to divorce and bravely pursue the life they want.
Should you maintain a broken marriage for the sake of your children? That's my opinion. Do you think you should maintain a broken marriage for the sake of your children? Welcome to leave a message to communicate.
-
I think it is necessary to maintain a broken marriage for the sake of the child, because it is the responsibility and obligation of a parent, and it is necessary to do so in order for the child to have a complete home and let him have a good growth ring.
-
Shouldn't. Because there is no happiness at all in a broken marriage, and such a marriage is painful, I don't think it should be maintained.
-
I felt the need to maintain a marriage for the sake of the children. Because in this case, for the sake of the child. It's completely possible to go down, because.
If you have a child, you can't easily say divorce, divorce is a very serious blow to the child, and it may cause a psychological shadow for the rest of your life.
-
I just don't divorce for the sake of my children, and the reason why there is no need to divorce at all is whether you both respect and love each other? Whether there are still emotionally divorced children, I must have it in my heart. It won't be healthy, but you guys. A bad family environment can also affect a child's mental health.
-
Children are our everything, everything is for children, so although the relationship has been fragmented. If you can maintain it, you should try to maintain it for the sake of the child, but if it is really a position, otherwise I think it is better to consider separation.
-
My view of this kind of broken marriage is that there is no need to continue to maintain it, and I know that there are many parents who think about their children from the perspective of their children, and feel that they do not want their children to grow up in an incomplete family, and they also do not want their children to suffer from other people's strange eyes because of this. I think it's understandable for parents to think about this, but parents should think about whether they are really doing this for the good of their children.
-
If you think that it is already a broken marriage, it means that there is no relationship between you anymore, even for the sake of the children, I admit it, and I don't deliberately maintain it.
-
It should not be maintained for the sake of the child, mainly because the child stays in such a family, in fact, his heart is also very distorted, so it is better to divorce as soon as possible.
-
can understand that parents want to give their children a complete family, but if the relationship is really not there, and they barely maintain a marriage that looks like a god, it is better to simply divorce and face their children with a more relaxed attitude.
-
For the sake of the child to maintain a broken marriage, of course, it is necessary, because the child can rely on the only two people in this world, you and him, if you give up on him, the other person also gives up on him, who can take care of him, he can't control himself, so you have to think about his future and support.
-
Don't maintain a broken marriage for the sake of your children, because children will not feel love and happiness in such a family.
-
No, there are already problems in this marriage, and the most direct way is to choose to separate, and the pressure on the children is also very great.
-
Should you maintain a broken marriage for the sake of the child, I personally feel that it is completely unnecessary, because marriage is a matter of two people, only by loving each other and respecting each other, then you can be happy, if you have been broken and have no feelings, being together is tormenting each other, and you are irresponsible for both parties, although the child is particularly important, but don't force yourself because of the child, after all, life is short, you should still think about it for yourself.
-
If your children are young, there is no need to maintain a broken marriage, because if you continue like this, you will still be unhappy, and every day is miserable, so it should not be.
-
Should. See what state your child is in.
If the child is sensitive and in adolescence.
You should communicate with your child first, let your child overcome the psychological barrier, and then solve the marriage problem.
-
To maintain a broken marriage for the sake of the children, of course, from the perspective of the children, it is better to insist on such a marriage for two years, three years or five years, your marriage may be different, is it okay to sacrifice two more years for the sake of the children?
-
It can't be repaired, and it has come to an end, so there is no need to compromise for the sake of the child.
-
To be honest, parents generally advise you to support a broken marriage for the sake of your children, and if there is a possibility of saving, don't give up, because you don't know how pitiful your children will be in the future, and no one cares.
-
If you still cherish and are afraid of regret, then you have to save, you have to face not only the contradiction of the marriage itself, but also the value of continuity.
-
Every day is a new hope and sunshine, so why choose the old people and old things? It's all broken up, why bother to seek pain for yourself, give up decisively, and find new hope may be the most correct choice for the bridge to destroy.
-
Don't hold back. Letting go is to give yourself freedom and give yourself a chance to be reborn.
-
If you and your husband can only talk about money and not feelings, it is like a partner, each taking what he needs. Is it necessary to maintain such a marriage?
That is, when he needs to pay in life, he will pay, and he will do what he should do. It's a bit like sharing a house to reduce the cost of living, and he won't take my feelings into account. I don't want to talk to him much, and the two of us don't talk about feelings, and sometimes I feel quite lonely.
We already have children.
A: If you use the word "maintenance" to describe your current state of marriage and future development, then I don't think you need to maintain it. But if you ask, is it necessary to improve such marriages?
I can be very sure of you: it is necessary. Because it is much easier to improve the current state of married life than to give up the new choice.
If this is indeed the state you described, then you should think carefully about when your marital status began to become like this, and what caused it? I don't believe that your marriage is in this state from the beginning, because this state cannot lead to marriage, unless your needs are not emotional, but other aspects.
Since you can ask questions, it at least shows that you have a positive mindset about solving the problem of manuscript completion, which in my opinion is very important and a very good start. Since your description is too simplistic, it is difficult to give more specific suggestions to improve your existing relationship. But improving the relationship itself is not difficult, you just need to understand the other person's needs and then meet the other person's needs.
The deeper your inner needs are, the easier it will be to improve your current relationship. Therefore, only by observing and communicating with your heart can you find out that the other party's needs are in the first place, and then it is possible to meet him. Don't feel humbled and flattered because of this, emotional relationships are always a two-way street.
A healthy relationship between the sexes can satisfy both parties at the same time, and your efforts will not only make the other person happy, but also achieve yourself. It's really not that hard.
-
My opinion is that there really is no need to hold on to a broken marriage for the sake of the children, because it is also a disservice to the children themselves.
-
My opinion is not to persevere, because if you persist, it will only make the child's heart more tormented.
-
Don't insist on it for the sake of the child, because the husband and wife are no longer together, even if there is no divorce, it will exist in name only, and the child will feel very uncomfortable.
-
No. Because this kind of marriage has no meaning at all, even if it goes down in the future, it will be a harm to each other, and it is not really for the good of the children.
-
Don't, for the sake of the child to insist that it is you who is tortured like this, you should follow your inner thoughts, communicate well with your child, and the child will definitely understand the parents.
-
I don't think it's necessary, because such a marriage will not bring any good influence to the children, and it will also make the children afraid of marriage.
This may be because the two of them never wanted children, so they didn't have children.
It is no longer the era of "the words of the matchmaker of the parents", so each of us has to be responsible for our own feelings. I don't know how many marriages without love exist in this world, but they choose to settle in their lives, so marriages without love and direct transition to family affection are soulless, and they have never lived for themselves, but for the sake of parents and children, this kind of relationship may be compromised for a lifetime, and some people can only become halfway couples, which is not worth it in my opinion. <> >>>More
A normal marriage is when the husband goes out to work every day. The wife takes care of the children at home and takes care of the housework, and the husband has a hot meal to eat after work. Occasionally, couples go out shopping and buy groceries. >>>More
What is love? And what is marriage? Love is when two people meet each other, longing to be dependent on each other forever, and to be able to stay with each other until they are white, this is love. >>>More
There are many couples, after having children, often use all their emotions on the children, but often ignore the emotional needs of their lovers, especially women. This approach is biased. Love for children is necessary, but that doesn't mean you should give up your affection for your loved one. >>>More