The debate is invincible, the opposing is not invincible, we are the opposite, what are the argument

The benevolence of the villain is easy to suffer from it.

Summary. First of all, Mencius believed that the main reason why human beings are different from other animals is that they have "human nature", and this so-called "human nature" is attributed by Mencius to benevolence, righteousness, courtesy, wisdom, and faith.

Then Mencius said that since human nature is fundamentally benevolence, righteousness, courtesy, wisdom, and faith, and these are all good qualities, these good qualities must be based on "goodness" in order to develop. If human nature is inherently evil, how can there be benevolence, righteousness, courtesy, wisdom, and faith? So human nature must be good in the first place.

Human Nature is Inherently Good Debate Contest I am the positive side and the negative side is the human nature and evil I have any sharp questions to ask the other party.

Mencius once said that human nature is inherently good.

First of all, Mencius believed that the main reason why human beings are different from other animals is that they have "human nature", and this so-called "human nature" is attributed by Mencius to benevolence, righteousness, courtesy, wisdom, and faith. Then Mencius said that since human nature is fundamentally benevolence, righteousness, courtesy, wisdom, and faith, and these are all good qualities, these good qualities must be based on "goodness" in order to develop. If human nature is inherently evil, how can there be benevolence, righteousness, courtesy, wisdom, and faith?

So human nature must be good in the first place.

How to ask the other party sharply, so that the other party has to admit that human nature is good.

If a person looks at everything from two sides, how can there be a distinction between friend and foe?

A benevolent person is the kind of person who is kind and benevolent, and values affection and righteousness.

For example, the limited success of the benevolent is object-oriented, and you can't talk to the king of Shang, Zhang Xianzhong, and Hitler.

What the benevolent have never been able to break through is the limit of human nature. First, the root of human inferiority always exists. When the benevolent wants to practice benevolent government, when benevolence and profit conflict, the benevolent cannot use benevolence to convince many selfish and greedy human beings who are consumed by profit.

To be sure, most people don't have the means to let go of their interests and become benevolent.

There is always a limit to human cognition, but we cannot reach the advanced consciousness of the benevolent, and the advanced human limitations of the benevolent are destined to be tragic heroes. The benevolent are great, but the benevolent are not necessarily invincible. Dr. Sun Yat-sen was indispensable for the public in the world, but his benevolence failed to influence the ignorant people.

The patriotic martyr Qiu Jin must be benevolent, but when he was generous, how many insensitive fools were watching the excitement among the onlookers. How can such a tragic benevolent man be invincible.

The story of the farmer and the snake, the story of the wolf in the mountains, tell the story of these graces and revenge, it is very convincing!

Personally, I feel that maybe the argument of the opposing side is a little better. Therefore, the preparation of the square should be more sufficient.

What comes to mind is that Confucius's Confucianism, centered on benevolence, has influenced China for thousands of years.

We can start with the Analects of Confucius, and describe the invincibility of benevolence with the doctrine that no one can compare with Confucius for thousands of years.

However, the opposing side will give examples to prove that the benevolent are not necessarily invincible in individual incidents, but the positive side should focus on the fact that for thousands of years (i.e., not individual incidents), in terms of overall influence, Confucius's thought that benevolence is invincible.

Personally, I feel that it might be better to do a little counter-argument. Therefore, the square of the writing is sufficient.

I think that Confucius's Confucianism has been influential in China for thousands of years.

From Confucius's "Analects", for thousands of years, no one can describe the invincibility of benevolence as compared to Confucius's doctrine.

But counter-examples of benevolent individual events may not be invincible, but should focus on the impact of thousands of years ago (i.e., non-individual events) from a holistic perspective, and Confucius's thought that benevolence is invincible.

The benevolent are invincible, otherwise, they are naturally not invincible, but have enemies. Hold on to this sentence to the death, benevolent, benevolent, kind. Here's what you think about, pay attention to or play on your own.

Liu Bei of the Three Kingdoms is benevolent and fraternity, but is he invincible in the end? 2Was Hitler merciful in wartime? But just such a person is almost invincible and stirs up the injustice of the world.

Confucius, Mozi is benevolent enough, I haven't seen him invincible in troubled times, the Warring States is still full of smoke, the so-called show only meets soldiers, and it is unreasonable to say, you and a rude, unreasonable person, you go to love others will think you are easy to bully. It's too much, to catch the invincible and turn it into an enemy.

But by my time, the east was defeated by the Qi state, and even my eldest son died; lost 700 li of land to the Qin state in the west; The south was insulted by the state of Chu again. I am very ashamed of these things, and I want to avenge all the victims, what should I do if I get to this point? ”

Mencius replied, "As long as there is a hundred miles of land, you can be king." If the king exercises benevolence to the common people, reduces the punishment, collects less taxes, cultivates deeply, and weeds in a timely manner; Let the able-bodied take time to cultivate the virtues of filial piety, respect, loyalty, and trustworthiness, serve their parents and brothers at home, and respect their elders and superiors when they go out.

In this way, they can make wooden sticks, which can also fight the Qin and Chu armies with solid armor and sharp knives and guns.

Because the rulers of Qin and Chu deprived their common people of productive time, so that they could not work hard to support their parents. Parents were starving from the cold, and brothers, wives, and children were separated. They have plunged the people into the abyss, and the king has gone against them, and who will resist you?

Therefore, it is said, 'He who does good government has no enemies.'" 'Don't be suspicious, O king!

Whether it is a business leader or an employee, as long as they learn to be "benevolent" and use it appropriately in their work, then the enterprise does not have to rely on the dead system to manage people, and employees will no longer deal with the company; In life, he is a popular person everywhere. It's the same with everyday relationships. With a "benevolent" mentality, you will definitely be recognized and appreciated by everyone when you treat others and things.

Will anyone be your enemy?

Positive: The theme of the cartoon is to make us understand the truth easily, let us be happy, there should be more than so many episodes of the invincible, there should be a second part.

Heaven and the land do not have the right of my choice, only the fate of my choice.

There is no pass that cannot be broken, and there is no enemy that cannot be defeated.

Our class and brother class are going to have a debate competition, and we are on the right side: the benevolent are invincible. Now I need some information, and I have encountered two such debate topics in the debate competition for two years, so I would like to share them with you here. The first one is: