The relationship between subjective history and objective existential history

The difference between a specific artifact and a history book.

Connections Subjective history is based on objective existential history.

Subjectivity is the inference of objectively known history.

1. What is the concreteness and historicity of the unity of subjectivity and objectivity1The concreteness of the unity of subjectivity and objectivity. The concreteness of the unity of subjectivity and objectivity means that the conformity of subjectivity to objectivity is realistic, not arbitrary and false.

This unification is subject to specific conditions such as time and place. The reality of the unity of subjectivity and objectivity requires that people should not replace objective reality with their own imagination, but should truly realize this unity and analyze in detail the historical conditions for realizing this unity. Lenin made it clear:

We do not deny the general principles, but we require a special analysis of the specific conditions for the application of these general conditions. There is no abstract truth, truth is always concrete. "The unity of subjectivity and objectivity means that subjectivity should be consistent with objective reality, that is, proceeding from reality and seeking truth from facts.

2.The historicity of the unity of the subjective and the objective. The historicity of the unity of subjectivity and objectivity means that the unity of the two is changing and developing, rather than immutable.

This unity changes with the movement of the objective material world, and is the unity in the development of the unity in the change, not static and rigid. Lenin once pointed out that the unity of thought and object is a process, and that thought should not think of truth as a rigid stillness, as untendencing, motionless, and bleak as spirits, numbers, or abstract thoughts.

It is the basic view of dialectical materialism.

The unity of subjective and objective concrete history refers to the dialectical unity between subjective thoughts and objective things in the process of people's understanding.

It is the basic point of view of dialectical materialist epistemology.

Dialectical materialism holds that objectivity determines subjectivity, subjectivity depends on objectivity, and people's subjective thoughts are the reflection of objective things.

The dialectical movement of human cognition is the dialectical unity of subjectivity and objectivity on the basis of practice.

The task of people's understanding is to seek a concrete historical unity between subjectivity and objectivity.

This unity should be concrete, that is, subjective understanding should be consistent with objective practice at a certain time, condition, and place.

This unity should be historical, that is, subjective understanding should be adapted to the changing objective practice.

The unity of concrete history requires that when the concrete process of objective practice has moved forward, subjective understanding should be changed accordingly.

If the subjective understanding remains at the original stage, we will make the mistake of right-wing conservatism.

When the concrete process of objective practice has not yet ended, the original contradictions have not yet been fully exposed, and the conditions for the transition to another concrete process are not yet in place, if people insist on forcibly pushing things on, reluctantly carrying out what they can only do in the future, and trying to transcend the historical stage, they will commit the mistake of "leftist" adventurism.

In short, "our conclusion is the unity of subjectivity and objectivity, theory and practice, knowledge and action, and the concrete history, and opposes all erroneous ideas of the 'left' or the right that are divorced from concrete history."

Summary. The unity of subjective and objective concrete history refers to the dialectical unity between subjective thoughts and objective things in the process of people's understanding. It is the basic point of view of dialectical materialist epistemology.

First of all, the unity of understanding and practice, subjectivity and objectivity, should be concrete and historical. The so-called concreteness means that subjective understanding should be consistent with objective practice at a certain time, place, and conditions.

Second, the unity of understanding and practice, subjectivity and objectivity, should be historical. The so-called historical, that is, subjective understanding, should be compatible with the objective practice of a particular stage of historical development.

Third, objective practice is concrete and historical, so subjective understanding should also be concrete and historical. When the specific process of things has moved forward and changed to another concrete process, the subjective understanding should be changed accordingly, and if the subjective understanding still stays at the original stage, this is detached from the concrete and historical characteristics of objective practice, and the thinking lags behind reality, and it is easy to make conservative mistakes.

How to accurately understand the "unity of subjective and objective concrete history".

Hello, I have seen your question and am sorting out the answer, please wait a while

Is it okay? The unity of subjective and objective concrete history refers to the dialectical unity between subjective thoughts and objective things in the process of people's understanding. It is the basic point of view of dialectical materialist epistemology.

First of all, the unity of understanding and practice, subjectivity and objectivity, should be concrete and historical. The so-called concreteness means that subjective understanding should be consistent with objective practice at a certain time, place, and conditions.

Second, the unity of understanding and practice, subjectivity and objectivity, should be historical. The so-called historical, that is, subjective understanding, should be compatible with the objective practice of a particular stage of historical development.

Third, objective practice is concrete and historical, so subjective understanding should also be concrete and historical. When the specific process of things has moved forward and changed to another concrete process, the subjective understanding should be changed accordingly, and if the subjective understanding still stays at the original stage, this is detached from the concrete and historical characteristics of objective practice, and the thinking lags behind reality, and it is easy to make conservative mistakes.

If the big topic calls for materialism, can we use this one point of view?

That's the specific answer.

But doesn't that fall under the category of epistemology?

Dear, that's the approximate answer.