Wangfujing dog ignored the police by bad reviews, can t consumers give evaluations?

It can be evaluated that Wangfujing Dog ignores the store's alarm is completely vexatious, and their store will not be open for a long time.

Wangfujing Gou, who was badly reviewed, ignored the police, and consumers can give correct evaluations, which is a normal thing, and the reaction of Goufu ignoring is relatively excessive.

Consumers are able to give reviews, because as consumers, we have the right to make objective evaluations of products that we think are not good, which is also beneficial to the improvement of merchants.

If you can give an evaluation, it is of course possible to take the right channel to give a review, and you should not take an excessive way.

Netizens think it's not only expensive but also not delicious, so they give bad reviews. At present, many people think that the buns that the dog ignores are expensive, and the service attitude is not good.

Buns are not tasty. The skin of the bun is too thick and the meat is less, so netizens gave this store a bad review.

Because the ** of the dog ignores the bun is too high, and the taste is not good. Netizens just made bad comments based on their feelings, but they didn't expect the dog to ignore and call the police.

Therefore, there is really no reason for this Wangfujing Goubuli Bun Shop to call the police, because consumers just objectively expressed their opinions, so the business called the police and scored the situation, and the police could not be called because the consumer gave a bad review.

Now there are very few stores because consumers give bad reviews to the police, Wangfujing Goubuli Bun Shop This time this practice is actually not conducive to the development of Wangfujing Goubuli Bun Shop, so you need to consider the consequences before doing things. Wangfujing Goubuli Bun Shop needs to reflect.

Of course, consumers have the right to make real feedback and evaluation of the products they buy. As a party protected by the rights and interests of consumers, it should enjoy the corresponding rights.

Wangfujing Dog ignored the police because of the bad reviews, consumers have the right to evaluate the product, Wangfujing's move is obviously an excesses, and he has no reason to apologize.

Of course, consumers have the right to evaluate as users, and consumer evaluation is also very important.

Consumers have the right to evaluate the product, due to this irrational approach of the Wangfujing store, the Goubuli Group has closed the store, and the Goubuli Group promises to serve the public well in the future.

The store showed an overreaction, as a well-known old brand to serve the public, it must accept good praise and bad criticism from diners, Wangfujing Dog ignored this wave of bad reviews on the police operation, lost the goodwill. Only enterprises that accept suggestions and reflect and correct can go further, and I hope that other industries can take warning.

I think that if you give a bad review, you will call the police, there is some fuss, and the manpower and material resources of ** should not serve these small contradictions. I think this is a contradiction between consumers and merchants, which can be self-regulated.

They are self-respecting and can only praise them, and a bad review is an insult to them.

In my opinion, a lot of bad reviews are actually telling the truth, and I don't let others say that my things are unpalatable. Regarding Wangfujing's response to ignoring the buns, I personally feel quite speechless. I specially read the comments posted by this **blogger a few times, these 8 yuan a bun looks no different from ours one or two,**blogger's evaluation is still quite pertinent, and he is not the only one who feels bad, many comments have expressed dissatisfaction.

To be honest, the home is also a store, and I think we should accept and improve more about the evaluation of customers. For example, the customer said that my xiaolongbao skin is hard, and it is true that when I taste it, it may be caused by the reason that it has been opened for a long time and the heat, so later our family strictly controls the heat, and now the sales of my xiaolongbao are the majority of the daily income. Many people may think that there are many things to do for a customer's unpalatable or bad review, but in fact, it is best for people to be willing to say it and let you improve.

So from the perspective of merchants, I never think that bad reviews are bad words, maybe because different opinions on bad reviews lead different merchants to take different measures. Wangfujing Gou in the news ignores the bad reviews of customers and dismisses them, but has to hold others accountable, believing that the bloggers have harmed their interests. Why can't they improve the quality of their buns, after all, there must be something special about Goubuli buns that can be passed down for so many years.

As the leader of China's steamed bun industry, Goubuli steamed bun is a must-see food for every tourist to the local area. And I think that everything is more expensive than valuable, and if it is only in addition to being famous, then sooner or later the fame will be dragged down by the quality that is declining year by year. <>

I hope that Goubuli Bun can be dealt with fairly, and it is not easy to inherit it for hundreds of years, so as not to disappoint the diners who love it, and not to damage this golden signboard.

No! First of all, as a customer, you have the right to make a corresponding evaluation of the delicious food in the restaurant! If it doesn't taste good, it won't taste good, as long as it's not illegal and malicious competition!

If the quality of the food or product is indeed not good, and the customer gives a more objective evaluation based on his own experience, such a bad review is not considered slander. After all, there is a fact that the product is not satisfactory, and this is also a way to urge the store to further improve the product.

Not necessarily, if there are too many bad reviews, it proves that there is really a problem with the store, and it cannot be said that people have framed it.

Bad reviews are actually not bad words, but may be the more intuitive feelings of some consumers.

It can only show that they can't accept the judgment of the public, thinking that they are deliberately looking for something to give bad reviews, there are so many bad reviews on the Internet, and they don't accept corrections with an open mind, and they say that it is the fault of netizens, I think it's really speechless.

As far as the negative review itself is concerned, when this option is set at the beginning, it means that the event object itself is a matter of facts, and it can point out the bad problems and suggest improvements, which is a benign setting. We often encounter positive and negative evaluation requirements in our daily life, and most of them describe things objectively.

Customers have the right to complain and express their opinions on the merchant! As a customer, you should have such a right, and the business should also accept criticism and endure the customer's complaints! Only such merchants are qualified!

The user bought his goods and expressed his true feelings, and there was no slander or malicious slander, so Wangfujing's report was unreasonable, and it would only leave a bad impression of a big bully.

It is wrong to be reported for posting a testimonial, because it is the customer's right to post a testimonial, and you can't just report the customer.

Netizens' bad comments** sparked heated discussions! Beijing Wangfujing Dog ignored the response like this, the bad review** is a vicious slander, and the police have been called to defend their rights. Since the matter has fermented, Wangfujing Gou has ignored it, but he has already slandered the bad words, has called the police, and will sue the relevant personnel and **** and other news together.

Nowadays, it is no longer possible to find a single message published by Goubuli Wangfujing store. After the bad review**, Wangfujing's response to the ignorance of the dog can be called a negative teaching material for crisis public relations, and I believe that the deletion of the previous news that was to be held accountable is mainly to calm down this matter, no longer ferment, and no longer intensify. <>

The photographer of this bad review** personally went to Wangfujing Goubuli and ordered two cages, one cage is a sauce meat bun, and the other is a meat bun. In the process of eating, the photographer of the ** was filming the whole process, carefully telling the experience of eating a dog and ignoring it. The photographer of the ** said that the products that Wangfujing Goubuli ignored were really unpalatable, and the meat sauce package did not have the feeling of meat sauce package, which was very greasy, and it was a bit stealing.

The relatively cheap meat buns are even worse, with very thick skin and almost no filling, which is very worthless. The ** photographer said that these products are not worthy of the fame of Wangfujing Goubuli, at best, they are the feeling of ordinary xiaolongbao outside. <>

And during the filming of **, there was a coughing sound, and the photographer of ** said that it came from the kitchen, which was terrifying. **After the shooting, it caused heated discussions on the Internet, Wangfujing Gou ignored the feeling that the **photographer had the intention of deliberately hacking the Wangfujing head office, and Wangfujing Gou ignored it and immediately wanted to sue, but the lawyer said that this ** is a consumer's experience, and there is no fiction, and it does not constitute infringement. <>

It may be that after consulting a lawyer, Wangfujing Goubuli felt that it was indeed difficult to prosecute, so he chose to delete the previous statement. No matter what the reason, now Wangfujing Goubuli is indeed getting worse and worse, and it is the most important thing to find the reason and reproduce the peak moment of Goubuli.

This restaurant posted on the Internet to investigate the legal responsibility of this netizen, saying that this netizen infringed on their family's reputation and rights, and saying that the ** posted by this netizen is untrue. Later, after a lawyer came out to explain that this was not an infringement, Wangfujing Gou ignored the buns and disappeared by himself.

The response said that the remarks in ** are all false information, and for those who publish and disseminate false information that infringes on the restaurant's right to reputation, and do not ask for the restaurant's consent to shoot and publish**, causing economic losses, it is now required to immediately stop the infringement and eliminate the impact, and publicly apologize on the mainstream**, otherwise they will be investigated for legal responsibility.

said in **, "The sauce meat bun turned out to be 160 yuan a cage" appeared in the netizen evaluation at the beginning. "If you say that the stuffing is small, you can tell me to return at that time, consumers will not spend money to do such stupid things in vain. ”

Because they don't solve their own problems from the source in the first place, but want to do these superficial efforts.

Because Goubuli didn't take the bad reviews of customers to heart, and didn't humbly correct his attitude of service.

The name of Goubuli is very loud, it is a time-honored brand, and there are bad reviews for fear of bringing a bad impact on the company and affecting business, and the bad reviews will be reported to the police and attract public outrage, so it is unpopular.

The main reason is that it is expensive, relying on its own fame, doing whatever it wants, and it is not delicious to make it yourself, ** is also expensive, it is obviously a big bully in the store, the customer says that it is unpalatable, he does not know how to improve, and he goes to the police, the merchant does not find the reason from himself, but calls the police on the bad review, which really makes people look down on it, so who dares to eat.

Because the things in this store are extremely poor, ** is still high, the meat buns are a lot of skin and a small amount of meat foam, and the service attitude is also very poor.

At the same time, some people think that the reason why the store dares to do this is because of his time-honored brand. It is true that Goubuli buns are indeed very famous all over the country, and many people also love the buns in the store very much, but no matter how good the brand is, some people don't like it, not to mention the food, the taste is different, and the degree of liking is different. Therefore, it is normal for customers to give bad reviews, and it depends on how the store treats them.

Some stores will turn a blind eye to bad reviews, and some stores will give gifts or coupons in exchange for good reviews from customers, but no one will call the police as soon as they give a bad review like this Goubuli bun shop.

So I think it's wrong for the time-honored dog to ignore it, and this is also where he is unpopular. After receiving the bad reviews from the guests, the store should communicate with the guests in a timely manner, listen to the suggestions of the guests, and make corrections in time if it is a good suggestion, so as to truly get the love of the guests.

Because not only is the food not as good as this store should be, but the attitude is also the reason why many people don't like it.