What should I do with this friend?

1. The only way to do it with A and not want to offend B is to do some projects that B's girlfriend doesn't understand, can't do and doesn't want to do, so that B's girlfriend feels that they are not guaranteed and doesn't want to be with you. Remember, when you are alone with B, you should say that it is not your personal idea, but you can't explicitly say that it is A's idea, leaving room for him to guess. Because there is no father and son on the battlefield, there is no need to show mercy, and if you can't be a partner at this stage, you can still be a friend, and it will be difficult to say the opposite in the future.

Besides, if B is a strict wife, your relationship will not be good or bad, and it will not be as good as his relationship with his girlfriend.

2. It's okay to do it with A, but remember that the upfront funds should be divided equally, or it is no different from a part-time job. If you don't have enough funds, you can ask someone else to borrow, or you can ask A to borrow. But the premise is that you have to make it clear that you are borrowing, there is a profit share, and you have to pay it back first.

If there is a dispute in the future, you will not be sovereign. After the accounts are clear, you are half a boss, and you can do anything. If a is determined that all the funds are out of his pocket, and you manage them, then you have to pull it.

You can also change the way, the money for opening a store in the early stage, you must grit your teeth and pay for it yourself, and then the expenses after opening, you can let A cushion it first (you don't tell him about this), because everyone is the boss, you just keep the numbers down. A, as one of the bosses, doesn't want to lose money either, so he should be fine. In this way, you can turn over only your funds without spending too much.

3. Personal suggestion: If you can do it together, the benefits are maximized. You use B to limit A's exclusive rights. Because when there is something to discuss, you can take B out and say that he is also the boss (and indirectly himself).

The problem is that A doesn't have that good relationship with B (listen to your tone). So, you first understand the reason why A is dissatisfied with B: is it because of his lack of personal ability, or because of his girlfriend's problem.

There is no way to do the former, it can be solved by equity distribution, A and you each, B accounts for 1, he should be fine. If it's his girlfriend's problem, tell B that it's a matter between brothers and has nothing to do with women, and let him try to convince his girlfriend, otherwise, he won't let B join the gang. When doing business, it will be troublesome if there are women doing things.

2 options 1 is to do it yourself, and no one cooperates.

2 is to work with the two of them.

Don't think about the rest. Got it?

Let's start with the psychology of each character.

Your perspective: 1. To put it simply, your real idea is to have A's funds, but you don't want to be A's salaryman, so I infer that you hope he doesn't have so much money. 2.

If there is no other possibility, you don't want to cooperate with B, mainly because his wife is more calculating, and I infer that if you can, you want B to bring money into the gang, but the account needs to be clear, and you have to be absolutely in charge. 3. You are currently passively accepting a 3-person partnership, and I infer that you do not want a 3-person partnership.

A's perspective: 1. He is not in a hurry to invest because he has abundant funds, he has a certain degree of interest in your project, I guess he is interested in cooperating with you, but he will not invest too much. 2. His wife's ideas are stable, so I guess his wife is not very enthusiastic about cooperation.

3. He has abundant funds, so it doesn't matter whether B is in or not. I guess if you don't ask, he won't come and mention the three-person partnership.

B's perspective: 1. His desire for wealth is the highest among the three of you, and he is anxious to tell A, I guess, he needs to borrow A's funds and join the three-person group, and he wants to partner with three people the most. 2. His wife is very calculating, assuming that he is really a strict wife, then I guess that his joining is his own independent behavior, and the distribution of funds is his wife's idea.

Q1: From the above personal analysis, assuming that cooperation is necessary, objectively only you and A have the dominant power at present, so it doesn't matter what happens to B. Of course, the emotional factor is not taken into account.

Q2: Working with A is the best option at the moment, because there are only two options, and you tend to do so yourself. The issues that need to be paid attention to are the amount of capital contribution, and the way of cooperation.

Q3: The main beneficiary of the wealth growth of the 3-person cooperative is B, followed by A, and finally you, which is not in line with the laws of economic financing.

In addition, I am very interested in analyzing from game theory, and I hope you can explain in more detail whether your main needs are just economic factors, or friendships of friends, or do you need to consider three spouses?

It's complicated, and the best thing to do is not to cooperate with either of them, as the saying goes, friends are easy to do, but buddies are hard to be. In the whole process, we can see that everyone's starting point is actually their own benefit, and they do not consider the feelings and interests of their peers, so the foundation of this cooperation itself is very fragile, even so, it is still as simple as only being friends.

Hehe, I personally think that you can ask AB out if there is anything. Sit there and talk about it. Let's not talk about the daughter-in-law Since the three of you are sworn friends.

And why do you reckon with whom? Why intrigue. Everyone sat down and made it clear.

I'm sure AB will understand.

It's really difficult, no matter how much I do, it won't help you much, in fact, your psychology should be a little bit of an idea! As the saying goes, please settle accounts with brothers, if you want to keep a friendship, then don't partner, otherwise your friendship will be in vain in the future! As for how not to do it, since A doesn't want to partner with B, you go to B and say that you told A that A wants to be big and you don't have this experience now.

And the distribution of profits is not good, this is an obvious problem, I believe B will also understand, maybe he will retreat at that time.

It's better to run it on your own. There will always be some friction in the partnership. Let's find a way to solve the funding problem.

Hehe, it's a bit like a love triangle.

It's too complicated.

I wasn't always a good friend, especially in middle school, when I was 16 years old and naïve and arrogant, I couldn't tolerate the slightest dissatisfaction with my classmates, and I paid a heavy price for it, losing a small group of friends.

Later, I met good sisters in college, and because of my stubbornness, I repeatedly caused disappointment and unhappiness to each other, but fortunately, they were generous and patient, and they were always able to tolerate and sincerely confide in their feelings, so that I had the opportunity to reflect. It wasn't until I was in graduate school that my old paranoid and eccentric temper gradually softened, and although it wasn't stable, I still found some way to make it easy for both parties to get along.

Like love, in the face of others, we are more or less lacking the ability to quietly serve some love, but we can't escape this compulsory course.

I've been fortunate to have friends with me for most of my life, but I almost forgot that camaraderie doesn't always come naturally when adult life loses its ivory tower to group activities, especially in the highly mobile modern world.

First of all, I think that we do not have to be the only basis to sanctify friendship, in the structure of human intimate relationships, compared with family love, friendship is extremely replaceable, this is not to say that friendship is nothing special, but its fluidity is even higher than love. Luckily, a love partner is a lifelong lover, friend and family member, and friendship continues to change depending on where we live, where we grow up, and where we work.

Keep your distance, be cautious!

You must have a sense of boundaries, don't have too many thoughts about non-late servants, and don't think that you will be a family! A friend's character needs to be tested!

The relationship between you and the scum is first of all sincerity and sincerity, you can't play tricks and tricks, you have to treat people equally, and if you want to be a friend for a long time, you must have to pay, and you can't be too much about the socks.

Of course, the relationship with friends is harmonious and messy to get along, if there are any contradictions and misunderstandings between the two of you, you must explain and communicate, this is very important, and another point is that you should think more about your friends and think about Air Liquide.

There are a lot of friends, but there are few confidants. This phrase is familiar. Emotions are the soul of a person, and the most important thing for a person may be love, but friends may be the one who spends the most time with us and is indispensable.

I remember when I was a child, I learned ideology and politics, and taught us how to make friends, for example, friends don't talk about buddy righteousness, and if friends are wrong, they should speak up, but this is very undesirable in reality, and we can't do this. Friends are a wonderful relationship, the lover relies on love, and friends, some people may say that friendship, I think, this is just a general statement, why do we need friends, perhaps, is a psychological need. Friendship may be a little more complicated than love, because friendship is not the only one, and it is impossible for us to take our all as we do with love, which is cruel, but it is true.

Friends don't just have to rely on righteousness, the book says that friends can't be righteous between friends, and I think sometimes friends need righteousness, depending on the situation. I feel very sorry for him, I feel that he is the kind of person who is willing to sacrifice himself, of course, he is very good to me, and he is willing to spend nine yuan for me if he has ten yuan. But he is not stupid, he is very bold and courageous, and he feels like a person who can achieve great things.

We've known each other since junior high school, and we haven't admitted the relationship, but once a friend asked him to fight, and he kissed me very hard before leaving, and at that moment I wanted to be his woman. Later, he worked for his father's company, and I also went to college, and the dormitory environment was not good, so he took me to live at his house. I'm 23 years old, four years old, and he hasn't touched me yet, and sometimes I suspect that he likes men, hee-hee.

I have a lot of friends, and when I get together, I am surrounded by sister-in-law, who inexplicably has a sense of superiority. For some reason, he and his father occasionally quarreled, but they really had similar personalities, very stubborn and righteous.

I feel that morality is their principle of doing things.

I know that he is a person who values feelings, so even if the family is not optimistic about this relationship, I have never mentioned breaking up. He was also a man of great self-esteem, and I didn't dare tell him anything.

The contradictions are tangled in ......

It feels like a mess of talking.