How to evaluate the dispute between Guo Jingming and Li Chengru about the theme of youth dramas in t

In the first issue of the actor please take his place, Guo Jingming and Li Chengru had a dispute about the theme of youth dramas. Guo Jingming and Li Chengru were people of two generations. Different times, different ideas.

It's normal to have arguments. And this kind of dispute. Personally, I feel that in the end, it should be able to be both opposing and unified.

After all, it has to be expressed. His. The main idea is the same, but there may be slight differences in the form of expression.

Li Chengru's criticism and Guo Jingming's rebuttal have their own merits, but the argument between the two is not in the same dimension. Guo Jingming has long been a controversial writer and director, and he feels aggrieved that the outside world does not understand the anti-bullying theme that his work really wants to express, and he wants to tell the outside world that the theme of his work is good; And what Li Chengru is not used to is actually the way in which handsome men and beautiful high school students fall in love in youth literature or idol film and television dramas.

To be honest, I think what Li Chengru said is completely fine.

Yes, your sadness flows into a river The movie is about school bullying, but is your ** really "serious" about school bullying as you said?

Isn't this funny, this book has been selling millions of copies, since you Guo Jingming to the publishing house, when did you mention the word school bullying, and now this book is the first in China to seriously discuss school bullying**?

According to this statement, the core of the Fuchun Mountain residence map is the protection of cultural relics and patriotism, the core of the dream showbiz is dream and love, and the core of the small era is friendship.

Even the core of Wen Wan and others becoming popular can explain that it is nature, and if they know how to be lustful, they will be Mu Shaoai.

What did Li Chengru say?

You can't use cheap brushstrokes to resonate with a wide range of people."

Empty performances, weak lines, and plots that are detached from reality cannot really touch people's hearts and cause reflection.

The Chinese movie "I Am Not the God of Medicine", the Indian movie "Let's Wrestle! Dad", South Korean movies "So Won", "The Melting Pot", "Parasite" and so on all have a huge repercussion on the progress of society, which of them says that they have a deep core? But why they make people reflect, make society progress, the most basic point, is real.

Whether it is sky-high drug prices, inequality between men and women, or legal loopholes, the gap between the rich and the poor, these profound social problems are all manifested from almost real character plots, because empathy can be generated.

Is this performance, or this movie, the real middle school life of the majority of middle school students? Can you clearly convey the meaning of anti-bullying?

Even, do you really know how school bullying is most common among middle school students in China?

If not, why can't others attack and criticize!

Because as you say, "You can never like something you don't like, but allow it to exist." You can continue to hate what you hate, but please allow others to like it", that's true, however, it has a scope.

Yesterday we were ashamed of the fans who cheered "MVP" and screamed "LBJ" at the Shanghai NBA game, holding the national flag and asking for autographs, which is something that most of us will never like, and according to your logic, should this behavior also be respected and protected?

I'll send you back what you said in a different order, slightly modified.

First of all, the script is not rigid, the actor can comment on the script, which shows that the actor has his own opinions and ideas, and the new generation of actors must have their own emotions, and it is best to integrate their own emotions into the script, so I think it is very reasonable. As far as the quality of an actor is concerned, he must still follow the script of the crew for interpretation.

In fact, it is normal to have disputes, after all, everyone also has their own ideas, so it is inevitable to encounter some situations where there are different views, at this time, we must respect the right of the other party to express their ideas.

In the first issue of "Actors Please Be in Place", the dispute between Li Chengru and Guo Jingming, I think his opinion is correct. Filming youth-themed movies and TV series can better cater to the psychology of today's young people, Guo Jingming has grasped this, so his movies and TV series are very selling, but it does not mean that these works are very connotative.

Teacher Li Chengru expressed his opinion on the ** of "Sadness Flows into a River", he thinks that the ** of writing youth themes is to show this kind of love story to young people today? There are so many things we have to write about, is it interesting to say that the boy just approached the girl with his arms and then coaxed it? If this continues, what kind of education will this generation receive when they rise up?

I think Li Chengru gives some advice to today's young people from the perspective of elders, which is understandable in itself, and he also wants these authors, screenwriters, and directors who create youth themes to be more conscientious and dedicated.

The two people are different in age and living environment, and their memories and definitions of youth are definitely different. Therefore, it is normal for disagreement to disagree.

In addition, Guo Jingming is a representative of youth pain literature, and in his works, he is not youthful, more grasping horses, and not close to life.

It is understandable that seniors of Mr. Li Chengru's age can't understand it.

The development of anything requires different voices, and so does filmmaking. The dispute between the two is out of their love and persistence for movies, and there is no problem.

The actor please take his seat in the seventh middle school Guo Jingming and Li Chengru about the dispute over the theme of youth dramas. This is normal, and there will be disputes in **? Just put politics on the table, and everyone talked about it.

And then there was constant arguing, incessantly. Reach a consensus. Finally, a unified view was reached.

This is also in line with philosophical thinking. Seek common ground while reserving differences!

Hello. In terms of professionalism, I think Li Chengru is more professional, at least he is a professional actor, and her professionalism has also been recognized, but Guo Jingming, as an outsider, can only be regarded as a writer at most, and the movies he makes are not of any standard, which is clear in the entire entertainment industry, he is a ticket player, so compared to the professional level, Guo Jingming is not qualified to make irresponsible remarks.

The dispute between Guo Jingming and Li Chengru about the theme of youth dramas can also be said to be a deliberately created gimmick of variety shows.

The dispute between Guo Jingming and Li Chengru about the theme of youth dramas in the first issue of the actor please take place has its own reason, and the people who eat melons, hehe, it's fine. Because after all, everyone has everyone's point of view.

In the first issue, Guo Jingming and Li Chengru had a dispute about the theme of youth dramas, and such a dispute is actually very normal. Everyone has a different opinion. It is impossible for all people to see the same thing.

Secondly, they are so quarrelsome. There is also suspicion of hype. So we can ignore these as melon-eating viewers.

Both have their own merits, but the arguments between the two are not in the same dimension. Guo Jingming has long been a controversial writer and director, and he feels aggrieved that the outside world does not understand the anti-bullying theme that his work really wants to express, and he wants to tell the outside world that the theme of his work is good; And what Li Chengru is not used to is actually the way in which handsome men and beautiful high school students fall in love in youth literature or idol film and television dramas.

I think that the two people have different generations and different views on the problem, and in today's current adolescence is a very market-oriented theme, Guo Jingming's statement is not wrong, so I think this dispute is actually the difference in perception between the two sides, and there is no substantive need.

Although Guo Jingming said. Very hard. But any arguments he has with other directors.

I don't support him because I think he's too superficial. It's not that he's superficial, it's that he can bring very little to people. He made his fortune and made money, completely by luck, and fooled the young and ignorant teenagers.

Guo Jingming and Li Chengru were people of two generations. Different times, different ideas. It's normal to have arguments.

And this kind of dispute. Personally, I feel that in the end, it should be able to be both opposing and unified. After all, it has to be expressed.

His. The main idea is the same, but there may be slight differences in the form of expression.

Although Guo Jingming understands the theme of youth. also started from writing youth themes. But after all, Guo Jingming doesn't read much, and he doesn't read many literary works, and he writes entirely by his own talent.

But not really. Eat in, so. The achievements are also not high.

After making money, I feel that my achievements are all due to my high level of writing, but this is not the case. A lot of it was luck.

This may be the director's plot arrangement! The two of them have a dispute about the theme of youth dramas. Each has different opinions. Different angles, different problems. It's also about boosting viewership. And arrange it!

Actors please take their places In the first issue, Guo Jingming and Li Chengru had a dispute about the theme of youth, I think what the two of them said is very reasonable, but there will be such a dispute only from different angles.

I think no matter how old Mr. Li Chengru is, he also belongs to the TV audience, he has the right to pursue youth-themed TV series, and he also has the right to express his views on TV dramas, I don't think Guo Jingming should be so uncherished of his power.

Topics for the seventh episode. Regarding youth dramas, I still think that what the old drama bone Li Chengru said is more reasonable. Guo Jingming. Although it represents a young new generation, the background is still a little worse. In momentum and topic discussion. There is no Li Chengru's steadiness and solidity.

I think Guo Jingming and Li Chengru have a dispute over the theme of youth dramas, and it is an academic decentness for them to express their opinions, so I support it very much.

Guo Jingming's way of employing people is not in line with the actor's self-cultivation.

They are people with two views, one is more obsessed with acting, and the other is looking at face and traffic.

Actors, please take their places, Guo Jingming and Li Chengru's dispute over the theme of youth dramas in the first issue is a very normal actor, they have different opinions, some different opinions, which is very normal.

I'm living a very good life now, and my life seems to be very happy, maybe I'm living a life that suits me. Looks pretty good.

I think Guo Jingming is very emotional in this show, In fact, as a writer, the heart itself is very sensitive, and it is very easy to express some moving things in life, some people may think that Guo Jingming is like this, a little pretentious, as if he deliberately showed himself in the show, so it is like this, in fact, I don't think so, I think this just shows that Guo Jingming is very soft in the depths of his heart, and in the end, he can't bear it when he chooses, but there is no way.

Guo Jingming has written a lot of **, I believe many of you have seen it, whether it is a small era, or sadness flows into a river, basically the ending is sad, from this point it can be seen that Guo Jingming's heart is very soft, and he may be too delicate when looking at the problem, and some people have also criticized what Guo Jingming wrote, thinking that there is no positive energy in what he wroteBut he has never been influenced by other people's statements, and still writes what he thinks is the best story to present to everyone.

In this show, there was a conflict between Guo Jingming and Li Chengru because of the fragment of sadness flowing into a river, Mr. Li Chengru thinks that many things in this ** do not have any positive energy, and I think that a good work should at least present positive energy to the audience, such as patriotic feelings, but Guo Jingming doesn't think soGuo Jingming believes that the content discussed in this ** is the campus bullying incidentAnd it is also said that Mr. Li Chengru is not qualified to evaluate this kind of thing because of the different times, and not thinking that it is valuable does not negate the existence.

In fact, in my opinion, Guo Jingming is very talented, maybe every time he presents something to everyone, it is too sad, and we also hope that Guo Jingming will add more positive energy to the content he writes in the future, so as to write something more excellent, maybe we can feel a person's heart through a person's works.

Guo Jingming cries every time, I think it's emotional. may be because the actor is too good and the performance life is real, which makes him think of the difficulty of his life.

I think it is, if a boy cries for something he cares about and feels that this matter touches you, in fact, boys will also cry easily, so I think Guo Jingming is emotional.

I don't think it's emotional. Otherwise, he cries every time, and I always feel like there is something else to it anyway. A man's sensibility looks like that, it's not quite like words, right?

I think he is very emotional, easy to receive emotional infection, and he really likes these actors, and he is also very sad about their departure, he is a person full of feelings.