Solve several grammar questions about the SAT

1. I think the reference is relatively clear.

in its treatment, treatment limits the scope of its services. It is precisely because of the treatment that follows that ITS does not refer to the other (diagnosis, use, technology).

2. D is a misnomer. Looking up the word desirous, I see the following example sentence:

Everybody is desirous of success, and the word is supposed to describe people, not things.

3. There is retired after it, and the act of serve is obviously before retire, so it is wrong to use the present perfect tense.

4、who enjoy this display of another's creations

Note that it's this display.

This does not refer to the preceding noun, but rather to modify the display

Can there be anything other than heart disease?!

2.It's not a problem with parallel, it's a diction error desirous function to describe people.

3。Changed to had served because it was retired.

It just says "this exhibition" and there are a lot of quilts in the exhibition, which don't make sense as you do.

erenowned for his straightforward, honest presentation of the news, walter vronkite became a fixture in the homes of entire american generation.

Striking for his straightforward and honest approach to journalism, Walter Vronkite has become a fixture in the homes of all generations in the United States.

Walter Vronkite's famously straightforward approach to journalism has made him a well-known figure in every household in the United States.

c walter vronkite became a home fixture

C Walter Vronkite turned into a piece of furniture.

e walter vronkite became a fixture in the homes

e walter vronkite became a regular visitor to people's homes.

Is it a B? 1.As a complete sentence, this sentence requires a predicate verb, standing is what the landlord said seems to make sense from a grammatical point of view. In this way, standing ten feet tall, their

Because is a conjunction, which means that it is followed by a complete sentence, so the definite form of the verb should be used, that is, the predicate verb should be used, not the present participle.

In the second sentence, that is followed by a clause, and acclaimec is not located in a verb, but a past participle, and the whole sentence lacks a predicate, so consists are used

The third sentence is that although and but cannot be used together.

The meaning of this sentence is that "after the prince has portrayed modern architecture as ugly," then "he is publicly and severely rebuked," that is, he is reprimanded only at the point immediately after he said this. If you want to say that he's been blamed from the time he's finished speaking, you need to change after to since.

Both after and since mean "in." later", but the former means "at the point in time that is next and will not continue", i.e., a moment in the future, and the latter means "the time between then and now", i.e., a period of continuous time to the present. Therefore, the tenses used in conjunction with these two words are very different from each other

After clauses are used in the past tense, and main clauses are also used in the past tense.

Since clauses use the past tense, and the main clause must use the present perfect tense.

1.The subject-subordinate tense should be consistent: i.e., if one of the clauses is in the simple past tense, then the other clause should also be one of the past tense (e.g., simple past tense, past perfect tense, past continuous tense, etc.).

2.In this sentence, according to the predicate verb characterized in the preceding clause, is in the past tense, then one of the following tense should also be used in the past tense. Here the sentence expresses a statement of a thing in the past, and it is enough to use the simple past tense.

But if the meaning to be expressed is "he has been severely criticized from the past, and the act of criticism will continue, then use the past perfect tense".

Well, that's what it means. If it is replaced with since... Just use the perfect tense

There can't be a specific point in time when it's done now, but after....The guide is a specific time adverbial clause, which shows the specific time, so it is better to choose the past tense if you can't use the perfect tense.

Personally, I think it's because of the bees mentioned earlier, and the comma is used later, so there's no need to use them or they, otherwise it will feel like ro.

1 All 1, there is no obvious past chronological contrast, do not use the past perfect tense. The question has already made it clear that the past period of time.

2 The grammar you chose is incorrect, of is to explain what the challenge is, but the sentence at the end of it is ......It's all messed up.

3 When independence is spoken, it is countable.

4 Remove the A.

The 5 phrase is compare a with b

6 should be changed to will be, would be is to mislead the candidate, you can't think that will should be changed to would, scheduled is the past participle used as a definite to indicate the passive relationship, has nothing to do with the tense, because the new library's opening can't take the initiative to send out the action, so it is planned.

7 even though It can better reflect the logical relationship between sentences, and the sentence you want to choose is mixed up, although the meaning is correct, but it does not reflect the sentence relationship, and the meaning expressed will be different. 7

1.This sentence is a sentence that describes the explanation. It does not indicate the past past, so the past perfect tense is not used.

Representing the affiliation, the challenge is obviously not related to the latter goal, and it is precisely because of that goal that it brings challenges to the United States.

3.It is followed by a clause modification that is concretized.

4 The two sentences before and after are separated by commas, and there are no conjunctions during the period, how to connect, so consider the following as a clause.

5 don't understand 6How to understand the past perfect tense, hehe. There is no flag and show is an active relationship, and the syntax is wrong.