In the new semester, how should teachers arrange seats for students?

Students who love to break discipline sit aside. For students who often love to violate discipline, have no self-control, and affect the learning of other students, letting him sit aside will affect some students less. But do more ideological work, tell him that he has improved, and when he has a good performance, he will change positions in time.

How to look at the teacher and let the students choose their own seats in order of grades, which is reasonable, because good students like to listen to classes, then they are good at the front desk, so it is right to say that the teacher is wide and dismantled.

This practice is incorrect.

In response to this problem, I will solve it from the following aspects:

First of all, for students, evaluating a student by their grades is not comprehensive and objective enough. Test scores can be influenced by many factors, and teachers need to consider many aspects when evaluating a student. And the practice of arranging seats according to grades should not be detrimental to the physical and mental development of students.

Second, the ranking of teachers according to their grades reflects the lack of professional ethics of teachers. Equality and fairness and care for students are important guidelines for teachers in dealing with students and handling the relationship between teachers and students. As a teacher, you should care about your students and treat them equally.

Finally, the arrangement of seats according to grades will also affect the unity and harmony of the class. Arranging seats according to grades will cause students to have different psychology, and different groups in the class will be generated according to the difference psychology, which will affect the unity and atmosphere of the class.

In short, teachers should abide by professional ethics, care for students, respect students, and treat students equally and fairly.

Promote the physical and mental health development of students.

Not optimistic about this model.

First of all, the teacher will divide the seats according to the grades, which will lead to a sense of inferiority complex with the students who are not very good grades, and secondly, this model will cause some students who do not get along with each other to accidentally be assigned to the same table as Heze, which will affect everyone's mood, and finally, students with good grades can always choose their favorite position, but students with poor grades can only pick up the rest of others, which is unfair.

To sum up, it is suggested that teachers can change once a cycle, not according to grades, but to be fair and just.

The practical meaning of such a row of acres is that the teacher wants to let the students who are good at learning and the students who are good at learning sit together, so that the students who are good at learning help each other and make the learning better, after all, they choose their own seats according to the order of their grades, and the students with good grades have the right to choose, and the students with good grades will definitely choose the students with good grades to sit together, so that they can solve each other's problems. Of course, it is not excluded that students who study well sit with students who do not study well, and they may have a good time, but this is rare.

Therefore, there are pros and cons to choosing seats according to the order of grades, which can make students with good academic performance perform better, but also make students with poor academic performance fall into a vicious circle.

I feel that there are advantages and disadvantages of sharp elimination, first of all, choosing a seat according to grades can motivate students to study hard and sit in the position they want, and secondly, you are also very likely to sit with the person you want, but on the other hand, it will also make people in the back have an inferiority complex, feel that they are very waste, and it is very likely that they will not be able to sit in a good position to listen to the class.

First of all, the teacher's starting point is to be good at the world. Because if you arrange the seats according to the grades, it will stimulate the students' competitiveness and allow them to study hard, but on the other hand, Sou Liangchang's words increase the pressure of the students, and it is easy for students to adjust themselves if they are not good. Something went wrong.

The teacher divides the seats according to the grades, which will lead to the students who are not very good grades feeling inferior, and secondly, this model will lead to some students who are not compatible with each other accidentally assigned to the same table, which will affect everyone's mood. Quietly.

To sum up, it is suggested that the teacher can change it once in a cycle

There are pros and cons to this approach.

The advantage is that some students will study hard for their favorite position, which can provide motivation for model students to study. The disadvantage is that some students with poor grades have the wrong learning method, and it is difficult to get up no matter how hard they work.

The suggestion is to change the method of selecting seats.

In fact, this is a very common problem in reality, the school wants to be promoted to a senior school rate, the teachers in order to tease the promotion rate of students and parents by unscrupulous means, teachers to completely professionalize the form of education, there is no sense of teaching and educating people and helping students with poor learning ability to improve the efficiency of the positive rate.

This is the teacher's self-motivation in cultivating the child.

The children will try to get in.

Keep climbing and improving.

This kind of thing is not recommended, it's not very good.

This approach is not due to the mental health development of students.

It is reasonable to think that the old teacher asks the students to choose their own seats in order of grades, because good students like to listen to lectures, so they are good at the front desk, so it is good for the teacher to do the right thing.

In fact, the teacher's seat arrangement is also a science, and if the row is not good, the students will have a lot of opinions. But if the students are arranged exactly according to their wishes, they may not take the class seriously, because they are only concerned with the same table, so how should the teacher arrange the best seats?

There are many teachers, he arranges seats according to the students' grades, so I think this way of arranging seats is very bad, because it may make some very tall children sit in the front, and it is possible to block the children in the back from listening to the class. Therefore, we should exclude students' grades and arrange seats according to their height, so that the taller students will not block the students behind them.

In addition to the height problem, we should also pay attention to the child's eyesight problem, because some children, he may not wear glasses, so at this time, we should put the students with poor eyesight first. In this way, they can also concentrate more during class, because some children have difficulty concentrating without glasses. Because he couldn't read the notes made by the teacher in class, he couldn't extract the notes.

Therefore, when the teacher is arranging seats, he can give priority to the tall students in the back row, and then put the students with poor eyesight in the front row.

In addition to arranging children's seats according to their height and eyesight, the teacher also needs to see which students are very noisy in class, and they need to be arranged separately, otherwise they are afraid that if they are lined up with the same table, it is likely to affect the effect of the surrounding students in class. They can be arranged on both sides or near the teacher, so that they can concentrate more during the lesson. If you only go to the seat according to good grades, it may make the students with good grades get better and better, and the students with bad grades may be willing to fall, so we must pay close attention to the learning of all children.

It should be arranged according to the child's height and eyesight, so that short students and students with poor vision should be seated in the front, and the seats should be adjusted at regular intervals so that the students are not in one position.

It should be arranged according to the height of the student, but the seats should not be set in stone, and should be changed once a week, which is the fairest.

I think it's better to adjust the seats in the class appropriately, back and forth, left and right.

Regardless of whether you are a good student or a student who is not a good student, I think that the seats in the whole class should be rotated, and everyone should sit in a circular pattern, sitting in the first row for the first time, sitting in the second row for the second week, and then sitting in the third row for the third week, and so on.

I think the teacher can let the students discuss where to do the digging by themselves, which is more fair, and everyone will not have any contradictions Liang Chang, and the teacher can also be a scumbag to let a casual shopkeeper.

It should be arranged according to the height of the child, so that it is reasonable to change the sedan chair, and it is not possible for good students to arrange it relatively high, otherwise it may affect the listening of others.

Be sure to let students change their seats once a week, and the teacher should not be biased, and must be fair and just, so that the arrangement will be more appropriate.

1. Propose to change seats on the grounds that your eyesight is not very good.

If you usually don't have good eyesight and happen to sit in the back row of the classroom, you should ask the teacher that because of your poor eyesight, it will be difficult to read the teacher's handwriting on the blackboard, and I hope that the teacher can help you solve practical problems and change to a seat in the front row, so that it will not cause trouble to learning.

2. You can ask the teacher that you want to record the teacher's lecture so that it can be reviewed.

Everyone's learning method is different, some learn quickly, and some accept slowly. However, no matter how fast or slow, as long as the final result of learning is finally achieved, it is the most gratifying thing for the teacher.

Students who are slow learners can ask the teacher, because they are slow to accept the knowledge, and want to record the content of the teacher's lecture in class. Therefore, I hope that the teacher can help change the seat to a seat closest to the teacher, so that the content of the teacher's lecture will be clearer.

3. It can be said that you can learn from students with excellent academic performance.

If you ask the teacher to change your seat, you can tell the teacher that you feel that your academic performance has declined recently, or that your learning efficiency is not high and your motivation is also lacking, and you hope to get help from your classmates with excellent academic performance. Therefore, I hope that the teachers can change their seats around the top students, and through their help, they can improve their academic performance.

4. You can say that your health is not good.

If you are weak and your seat is by the window, you can ask the teacher to change the seat, you can say that you are weak and can't blow the wind, and being close to the window will make your body feel uncomfortable. I hope that the teacher can understand his difficulties and move to a position far away from the window.

5. It can be said that the classmates in front of you are tall enough to block you from looking at the blackboard.

If you are not as tall as the classmate in front of you, you can ask the old stool teacher to change seats. Because the tall classmates in front of you block your view, it affects you to see the teacher's handouts on the blackboard, which affects your learning, and I hope the teacher can help you change your seat to a position where you can easily and clearly see the teacher's handouts on the blackboard.

This method was used by our homeroom teacher when I was in high school. At the time, I thought it was fun and interesting, and I was looking forward to who would sit (because of the good grades, of course, I was the first to pick a seat). This gives you an advantage.

Students who feel like they have poor grades are discriminated against. So I didn't approve of this method later, and felt that the teacher was unfair.

According to normal people's thinking, good students should be placed next to poor students and help poor students learn one-on-one. I feel the same way. Ever since I became a teacher, I have always felt that poor students should be taught at the same table in the first few years.

But slowly, I realized that this was actually the teacher's wishful thinking. Will a poor student really look up to him because he is a classmate?

The cold reality is that most poor students don't get better because they have classmates. On the contrary, most students will have fluctuations because of their own influence. There must be people here who disagree and say no, I just sit with the top students to improve my grades, or as a top student, I am not affected by the poor students next to me, and so on.

I've taught over 400 students, but this is a special case. Back to our question: fairness.

Do you think it's unfair for poor students to be marginalized, but think about it again, is it fair for good students to be dragged down by poor students?

It is important to emphasize that I do not support the practice of the above teachers, nor do I support students sitting with poor students. Personally, I think that a fairer way to arrange seating is to sit in groups, and divide the class into three levels according to grades: upper, middle, and lower. Students in each group belong to three levels: high, intermediate and low.

In the group, students with similar levels and complementary strengths are at the same table (neighbors). Seating is never easy, and it's never completely fair in every way. It is also necessary for educators to work together.

This method is good or bad, it can drive the learning atmosphere of the people around you, and it can also ensure that children who learn well are not affected!

is incorrect, which can easily lead to some poor grades, and the child has some inferiority complex. At the same time, it is also not conducive to the development and growth of children's mental health.

No, it's not fair to students because some students are small or have poor eyesight, so they need to sit in the front row, and the seats should be arranged according to the student's own situation.

I think this is wrong, it is not in line with the professional ethics of teachers, and if the seats are arranged according to the grades, it will make those students who are not very good in academic performance feel inferior, feel that they are abandoned, and it is not conducive to the healthy growth of students.