What is the actual performance of the Huawei Kirin 650 processor

The Kirin 650 chip is good, and the functional characteristics are as follows:

The Kirin 658 is manufactured on TSMC's 16nm FinFET+ process, which is the most mainstream process in a series of mid-range SoCs today. The Kirin 658 is composed of 4 A53 large cores and 4 A53 small cores, and is also equipped with an i5 coprocessor. For some lightweight tasks, the GPU is replaced by the MALI T830-MP2, and the overall performance is relatively balanced, but the GPU performance is relatively weak.

In addition, the Kirin 658 is equipped with an i5 co-processor, which can greatly reduce the power consumption during standby, and is designed for the LBS positioning function, so that the mobile phone can turn on the step counting and sensor call anytime and anywhere, and perform its own duties with the CPU to obtain better standby power consumption.

In general,Kirin658Actually, the upgraded version of the previous Kirin655,The main thing is to increase the frequency,It still integrates 8A53 cores,4The main frequency of the big core is increased to,The four small cores are still the same。

The Kirin 658 processor performance is as follows:

Query the information on Huawei's official website, it can be seen that Kirin 658 should be an upgraded version of Kirin 655, mainly to increase the frequency, or to integrate eight A53 CPU cores, divided into four large and four small, of which the main frequency of four large cores has been increased to, and the four small cores are still.

The GPU graphics core is still Arm Mali-T830 MP2, but the frequency has not been announced, and I don't know if it has also been improved.

I didn't say anything about other parameters, I believe it is still TSMC 16nm FinFET+ process manufacturing, 64-bit dual-channel LPDDR3 memory, LTE full Netcom.

There is news that Huawei will release an Honor 8 lite abroad, and the processor is also a Kirin 658.

Huawei's previous nova used a processor of Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, 14nm process, octa-core A53, Adreno 506 GPU, LPDDR3 memory, obviously Kirin 658 performance is not weaker than it.

The frequency in the official parameter table is incorrect.

It should be considered medium, and the high-end is 950 with 960 and so on.

It's so-so.,Now the mainstream ones are Xiaolong845,Now it's all going to be out855,Kirin 658 can only be regarded as a low-to-medium processor,And I've only heard of 659,It's not much worse to think about it.,I suggest you don't buy such a garbage processor.。 Now that the Kirin processor has reached 980, it should be understood how much worse it is.

Huawei's machine can, but it's unstable.

It's pretty average, and now it's outdated.

Mine is Kirin 659, I've been using it for almost a year, enjoy 7s, it's not bad to use, it's very fast.

1. Kirin 658 integrates 8 A53 cores, based on TSMC 16nm process, built-in MALIT830 MP2 GPU, but the main frequency of 4 large cores has been increased to, and the four small cores are still the same.

2. To put it simply, Kirin 658 compared with the previous Kirin 655, the CPU frequency is mainly improved, and the Kirin 658 is mainly designed for LBS positioning function, so that the mobile phone can turn on step counting and sensor call anytime and anywhere, and perform its own duties with the CPU to obtain better standby power consumption.

Hello, Qualcomm's Snapdragon 625 and Huawei's Kirin 650 both contain 8 A53 cores, and the process level of 14NMLPP and 16NMFF+ is similar, respectively, with slight advantages in core size and power efficiency ratio.

The Snapdragon 625 is 8-core, while the Kirin 650 is 4+4-core. Qualcomm's 8 cores can reach the main frequency. Huawei's 4 major cores are also clocked at 4 small cores.

In heavy applications, the Snapdragon multi-core performance exceeds that of the Kirin 650. For light applications, such as brushing Zhihu, the Kirin 650 is only working with small cores, and it is estimated that it has a slight advantage in power consumption.

The positioning of these two U is to focus on battery life (power consumption) on the premise of being able to use sex.

By the way, Samsung's latest Exynos7870, 8 A53 with 14nm process frequency, is similarly positioned.

The above three U are relatively similar, and they are all high-end processes and low-end architectures. Qualcomm, Huawei, Samsung. Qualcomm is more performance-oriented, and Samsung is more power-oriented.

If you compare the high-end architecture, the U of the low-end process, the performance of the above three models is not as good as the Snapdragon 650 652 of the A72 large core, but in terms of power consumption control, it is better than the Snapdragon 650 652 of the 28nm process.

The Kirin 650 is equivalent to the Snapdragon 805, and the 805 is slightly stronger than the 625, so the Kirin 650 is stronger than the Snapdragon 625, but it can only be said to be slightly stronger.

Judging from the comparison of models, Kirin 650 should have no advantage in terms of performance, and we will reveal it through the actual test below. The first is the parameter comparison, both of which are significantly different in terms of CPU architecture and GPU, as shown in the figure below.

Kirin 650 and Snapdragon 625 parameter comparison.

1. Comparison of Antutu running scores, the following picture shows the comparison of the Honor 5c equipped with Kirin 650 and the Huawei Maimang 5 Antutu equipped with Snapdragon 625, and the results are as follows.

Honor 5c and Huawei Maimang 5 running score comparison.

Judging from the running score test, the running score of Maimang 5 Antutu reached 10,000 points, while the Glory 5C running score was 10,000 points, and the gap between the two was nearly 10,000 points.

The core factors that determine the CPU performance of a mobile phone include CPU computing performance and GPU graphics (gaming) performance.

Comparison of the Honor 5C and Maimang 5 3D Geekbench graphics performance scores.

Judging from the comparison test, in terms of GPU graphics performance, the Kirin 650 is a little worse than the Snapdragon 625.

In addition, in terms of network support, the Kirin 650 does not support full Netcom for the time being, while the Snapdragon 625 supports full Netcom and supports fast charging.

In the end, the main game performance test is a heating test, from the perspective of experience, there is not much difference between the two in the smoothness of the mainstream game experience, and the fuselage heating control is also similar, in general, Snapdragon 625 performance is slightly better.

Honor 5c and Maimang 5 gaming heat test.

Comparison summary: In general, Kirin 650 is slightly lower than Snapdragon 625 in terms of CPU, GPU and other performance, in addition to being inferior to the latter in terms of network standard and fast charging support, which is the reason why the Kirin 650 and Snapdragon 625 models are relatively large. However, from the perspective of performance experience, in today's era of overperformance of mobile phones, the difference between the two can be felt in terms of the smoothness of mainstream games and applications.

Of course, the Snapdragon 625 is good, and the HiSilicon 650 is positioned at the low end, and its performance is lower than that of the Snapdragon 625.

See for yourself, there is a detailed comparison.

Kirin 655 processor.

The Kirin 655 octa-core processor uses a 16nm process with 4 coprocessors, while the GPU uses MALIMP2T830 to support full Netcom.

Kirin 650 octa-core processor, also using 16nm Finfetplus process, using architecture, built-in 4 large cores + 4 small cores, specifically 4, and GPU is Mali-T830MP2, supporting mobile Unicom dual 4G or telecom 4G network.

According to Huawei's official statement, Kirin 655Compared with 650, the CPU computing performance has been increased by about 65%, while the GPU has been increased by 100%, and the comprehensive performance has been significantly improved, in addition, the network standard has been upgraded, supporting full Netcom, and supporting 4G+ network.

Judging from the actual measurement, the performance improvement of the Kirin 655 compared with the 650 is not obvious, and it can only be regarded as a small upgrade. The performance of the Huawei Kirin 655 processor is lower than that of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, slightly stronger than the MediaTek P10, and the performance is relatively decent, meeting the needs of daily mainstream applications and games, and the pressure is not great, but it cannot meet the needs of large-scale games.

Huawei's CPU Kirin 950 is positioned as high-end, focusing on performance, while Snapdragon 625 is positioned in the mid-range, focusing on low power consumption and stability, with different target positioning and not in the same grade.

In terms of performance, the 4xA72+4XA53 of the Kirin 950 is far stronger than the 8XA53 of the Snapdragon 625, and the T884 of the Kirin 950 is far stronger than the Adreno506 of the Snapdragon 625 in terms of GPU, so in terms of performance, the Kirin 950 is better than the Snapdragon 625.

The power consumption of the Kirin 950 process is 16 nm, and the Snapdragon 625 process is 14 nm, which is much lower than the Kirin 950 in terms of power consumption and heating, which is more power-efficient.

As far as the Snapdragon 625 is concerned, it's a little cheaper.

The Kirin 950 processor is Huawei's flagship CPU, and its performance is comparable to that of the Snapdragon 820 flagship processor. The Snapdragon 625 processor is just a mid-range processor with decent performance and very good battery life.

Obviously, the Kirin 950 is better, as a CPU of the same era, the Kirin 950 is Huawei's flagship machine, and the Snapdragon 625 is just a low-end processor of Qualcomm, whether it is in terms of computing power or GPU performance, the Kirin 950 can kill the Snapdragon 625 in seconds.

The Kirin 950 is much better than the Snapdragon 625 in games, the battery life is good at 625, and the rest seems to be about the same, I just have the Honor 8 and Xiaomi Mi 5X on hand.

Kirin 950 is a little better, and the comprehensive performance is basically the same as that of Snapdragon 636, but playing games is still 636 better... However, in actual use, Huawei's system is not good, and the lag is obvious. After making a comparison, the smoothness of the Kirin 950 is not even comparable to the 625 of the MIUI system.

The Kirin 950 is much taller than the Snapdragon 625! 625 low-end processor!

625 is good, 950 is 16nm, 625 is 14nm, and the smaller the nanometer under the same conditions, the smaller the power consumption.

The core frequency of the two is almost 950 is 4, 4, and 625 is 8.

GPU put on the face of the personal think Huawei is hard,950I didn't use it,I only used it960,The glory I bought at the beginning9,The actual experience is not as good as 660,Although the theoretical performance is above660,But it is very hot to play games, and it will not take long to cause automatic frequency reduction。

The Kirin 950 shown in the picture above is much better than the Snapdragon 625, and the 950 is almost at the Snapdragon 636 level.

Of course it's 950 good... One is positioned at the high-end, the other is positioned in the mid-range, and there is no comparison.

The Kirin 950 is not only a little bit better than the Xiaolong 625. Not at a level, look at the picture:

Depending on your own needs, power saving 625 performance 950

But buy the new instead of the old Why not buy the 660 or 710 such as the Xiaomi 6x?

There is no need to compare at all, the 950 is the A72 architecture of the 16nmff+ process. 625 is a 14nm process (LPE red or LPP doesn't matter, it's not as good as TSMC FF+) A53 architecture.

950 comprehensively suppresses 625, which itself is a heaven and an underground.

It's not a notch thing, the Kirin 950 is stronger than the Snapdragon 625 in terms of both CPU and GPU. It's a bit of a discussion value if you compare the Snapdragon 650. Netizens generally discuss that Qualcomm's mid-range can be compared with other high-end, mainly because Qualcomm's independent architecture has GPU advantages, and you take the low-end Snapdragon 625 compared with other people's flagships of the same generation or neighboring generation too much Qualcomm.

The CPU part of the Kirin 950 is 4 cores with a frequency of A72, plus, 4 cores with a frequency of A53, and the GPU part (equivalent to the core display of the computer) is a mali T880 with a frequency of 900MHz.

The CPU part of the Snapdragon 625 is 8 cores with a frequency of A53, and the GPU part is the Adreno 506

The 950 is slightly better, after all, Huawei started late.

Expensive good. It's better to buy the most expensive and the best in the tens of thousands.

Drive Home's mobile phone CPU performance ladder chart to find out.

I listen to netizens here to say in general terms, it is difficult to be objective.