High School Students and Logic! 10

Logical credits formal logic and dialectical logic, I will not give you a definition here. Let me introduce you to some phenomena, the so-called formal logic is like a technology, and its way of reasoning has a certain formula. For example, the math problems you are currently exposed to are all about cultivating your formal logic skills.

The dialectical logic is that the conditions change instantaneously, and different conclusions will be obtained from different angles. For example, we usually come into contact with gambling games, chess, Go, strategy computer games, StarCraft, Warcraft, these are the training bases of dialectical logic. As a high school student, you should be proficient in solid formal logic techniques and cultivate certain qualities of dialectical logical thinking.

Lay the foundation for future professional learning. Of course, my advice is to take your time, people have different qualities in this area, I hope you can experience through practice in which area you have strengths, and be able to develop your strengths and avoid weaknesses, which is why some students have excellent academic performance, but in some daily life adaptability is not as good as some students with poor academic performance, if you don't believe it, try to observe. To 90% of the extent, the grades reflect a person's formal logic technique.

Since it is a technique, time is the key, and whoever practices more will get a high score.

Therefore, the conclusion is that no matter how high the score is, it can only be a technique, and the most critical thing about a person's ability is the ability to change.

And formal logic is the key to unlocking the magic box of change. You can try anything, first of all, formal logic, to the end, just like Lao Tzu said, the Tao is the Tao, the very Tao. I hope you can discover and appreciate your own characteristics, high school is the most nostalgic time of a person's life, I wish you happiness.

I have a bit of an opinion on this issue. I think it's better for high school students not to study logic specifically. The best way to exercise logical thinking skills is to learn physics and mathematics well. Physics, in particular, is very good for exercising the mind.

Logic is a university subject that is very esoteric

Don't think about it, it's useless.

If you want to develop your right brain, listening is the best way!

The book isn't strictly finished yet, but it's pretty much the same.

In general, this book introduces 88 logical fallacies that are common in our lives, and gives many very everyday examples to make it easier for readers to understand and complete the purpose of getting started with logic.

I think it's still very meaningful. Before, I would see some very strange and common logical problems in the comment area of many social **, such as Weibo, Zhihu, Station B, etc., but I always couldn't understand it; I often wonder if my logic is wrong.

These confusions are answered in this book.

Because I just finished my psychological counseling training, I will have different opinions when I look at these fallacies.

I don't know if it's because the disciplines are different and the concept names are different.

For example, "Men don't have a good thing." ”

This is an inductive fallacy in logic; In psychology, it is called an irrational belief that is generalized.

Another example is, "If I don't get into college, my life will be over." ”

This is known in logic as the slippery slope fallacy, which means that if A happens, then B happens, then C, D, E, etcStep by step to the extreme, in fact, this series of causal relationships is not reasonable. And in psychology, this is called the worst irrational belief.

It can be called a powerful tool for the Internet :d

Personal rating: Three and a half stars.

Here are the thoughts:

The author of this book, Gesang, sounds like an ethnic minority, and it is difficult to find this person on it. According to the book, he is a national second-level psychological counselor and a lecturer in psychological science communication. He has long been committed to the study of self-improvement and personal growth.

I love logic because it not only helps to improve logical thinking ability and acquire new knowledge, but also helps to express ideas correctly and improve work efficiency.

The publishing house is China Textile.

At the beginning of 22, online shopping cost yuan. Great value for money after reading it.

Summary. Proposition A: Wealth is not the source of happiness.

Format: First of all, wealth does not satisfy people's deepest needs. For example, wealth does not solve people's feelings of loneliness and emptiness in their hearts.

Secondly, wealth also does not bring true happiness because it is only a material pleasure and does not satisfy people's spiritual needs. Finally, wealth can also have negative effects on people, such as stress and anxiety, as wealth can be stressful and make people worry about being snatched away. Conclusion:

Therefore, it is certain that wealth is not a source of happiness.

I'm sorry I can't open **, you can only type to ask me, sorry.

Please ask me one question at a time in the form of text, dear.

But I can only post pictures.

Then you recognize the text and sort out the problem and send it to me, dear.

Launched by the following blunt propositions, the other blunt propositions of the current phalanx are true or false, not some of the popular ** is worth appreciating repeatedly.

All pop ** is a fake that deserves to be appreciated repeatedly. Some pops may not be worth appreciating over and over again, such as some low-quality pops.

sep pos p s has a dash on the s, whether this reasoning is valid or not.

is effective. SEP-POS is a high payment system, which can help merchants collect payments from consumers, and can realize cash payments and credit card payments. Its horizontal line indicates that it can support a variety of payment methods, so it works.

Please use a general rule to explain whether the following reasoning is valid Human beings have thoughts, and dogs are not human, so dogs have no thoughts.

This reasoning is invalid. From the perspective of the general rule, Huai refers to the fact that there must be a causal relationship between the premise and the conclusion of the reasoning, and there is no causal relationship between the premise and the conclusion of this reasoning, so this reasoning is invalid.

The conclusion of a valid syllogism is a proposition that proves his case and formula.

Proposition A: Wealth is not the source of happiness. Format:

First of all, wealth does not satisfy people's deepest needs. For example, wealth cannot solve people's loneliness and spiritual emptiness. Secondly, wealth cannot bring true happiness, because it is only a material state of enjoyment, and cannot satisfy people's spiritual needs.

Finally, wealth can also have negative effects on people, such as stress and anxiety, as wealth can be stressful and make people worry about being snatched away. Conclusion: Therefore, it is certain that wealth is not a source of happiness.

<> the subjects of the management joint examination comprehensive 199 have the subjects of the logic test;

Logic is 30 multiple-choice questions, each question is worth 2 points, a total of 60 points;

Summary. Hello dear 1The inclusion relationship means that concept A contains concept B.

For example: A person consists of both a man and a woman. 2.

A cross-cutting relationship refers to the mutual inclusion of concepts A and B. For example: figure painting and oil painting.

Figure painting contains oil painting; Oil paintings contain figure paintings. 3.A homogeneous relationship means that concept A and concept B have exactly the same meaning.

For example: beautiful is exactly the same as good-looking.

Hello dear 1The inclusion relationship means that concept A contains concept B. For example:

People include both men and women. 2.Cross-relationship refers to the mutual inclusion between concept A and concept B.

For example: figure painting and oil painting. Figure painting contains oil painting; Oil paintings contain figure paintings.

3.The whole Tongguan Chun nucleus system refers to the exact same meaning of concept A and the concept of excavation B. For example:

Beautiful is exactly the same as good-looking.

Relationships between concepts There are five types of friendship relations between concepts: identical, all-different, containing, containing, and befriending the pre-origin fork relations. (1) The whole is the same as the repentance system, also known as the same relationship, and the extension of concept A is the same as that of concept B, that is, all A is B.

It can also be said that the two concepts are the same thing.

I have questions about those.

I have questions about those.

All the same, including connotation.

What is the relationship between the two concepts of blessing and Lu Xun? Connotation.