The positive view of the debate on whether humans are protectors or destroyers of the environment

You're from Changfeng Middle School, right?

There are many negative impacts on the environment, the continuous development of human beings, energy, land are the inevitable need of things, and human beings are advanced animals, especially now thousands of animals, the extinction of plants are related to human activities, China is a typical Xinjiang tiger, a person will dig the Tarim River embankment, watering their own crops, but the Tarim River is diverted, the green space downstream of the river disappears, and the habitat of Xinjiang tigers disappears! A small act of humanity has led to a genocide on the planet.

The question is not black and white. Human beings are not entirely the protectors or destroyers of the environment, but in different situations, they not only protect and improve the environment, but also have the behavior of destroying and polluting the environment. Some of the actions of humans have had a significant negative impact on the planet.

Industrialization and modernization are responsible for large amounts of greenhouse gas emissions, leading to problems such as rising global temperatures, climate change, and rising sea levels. Large-scale deforestation and ecosystem destruction have led to nuclear collapses, the extinction of many species, and the collapse of ecosystems. The release of large quantities of pollutants and waste has led to a threat to the health of the planet and people.

However, humans are also actively taking steps to protect the environment. In recent years, many countries have begun to adopt renewable energy and set targets to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Environmental organizations and volunteers actively participate in environmental protection activities and promote the implementation of environmental protection measures in enterprises.

At the same time, people are becoming aware of the importance of ecosystems and are taking active actions to protect natural resources. Therefore, human beings are both protectors and destroyers of the environment, but with the improvement of awareness and the development of technology, we can better protect our beautiful planet through action. <>

In the course of the first debate, the second and third arguments, and the free debate, we have elaborated on the various reasons why human beings are environmental protectors in terms of human subjective intentions, the essential attributes of human beings, the reasons for human existence, and the unshirkable responsibility of human beings as environmental protectors. I believe that the opponent should have understood long ago that since the birth of human beings, it is impossible to survive without affecting the environment, which is an inevitable fact. In the history of human development, especially today, with the rapid development of science and technology in modern society, the adverse impact on the environment is as painful as all of us!

The fact that human beings are saddened by the deterioration of the environment is enough to prove that human beings are not destroyers of the environment, but protectors of the environment! Besides, human beings have never intentionally destroyed the environment! On the contrary, humanity is now making unremitting efforts to make up for its mistakes!

Worldwide, protected areas are constantly being established and expanded, and environmental protection legislation is constantly being improved and strengthened! It is thanks to human efforts that the African black rhinoceros, the North American bison, and the Chinese crested ibis, which are on the verge of extinction, have recovered their populations! Since the old man Ma Yongshun can change from a "tree felling hero" to the most outstanding environmental protection person recognized by the United Nations - the world's top 500 environmental protection experts, human beings will definitely become qualified masters of the earth!

In the process of preparing for the debate, we found a lot of ** about environmental protection on the Internet, and the opponent will not deny that these ** should be established by human beings, let alone deny, and the establishment of these ** is to promote environmental protection and remind people to be better environmentalists. In the same way, in our society, humanity has signed various conventions for the protection of the environment! Various laws have been enacted to protect and improve the environment.

In addition, human beings develop and utilize the environment for their own survival and development, which is not absolute "destruction", but should be "transformation". Will the opponent argue that humans are useless sleepy insects just because they spend more than half of their time sleeping? We should see the hope of the world and the mainstream of humanity, and believe that human beings are, should and can only be the protectors of the environment!

Thank you judges!

The debate tournament is one of the most painful things I've ever seen.

Square? Is the protector square, or is the destroyer square?

When human beings exist and develop for themselves, the transformation of the environment is inevitable, and its purpose is not to destroy.

Nature itself is a battlefield, survival of the fittest, natural disasters are continuous, human beings for their own existence development and transformation of the environment belongs to the competition of nature, understandable.

The development of industry is the development of human beings, which is inevitable, although there is pollution, but human beings are trying to make up for it, rather than letting it go;

You don't know what the newspapers are talking about there every day and where trees are being planted, and the state has also designated Arbor Day for this!

It's the same with animals, illegal capture is a rule!

All this shows that human beings play a protective role in the environment, and who else will protect the environment except humans, a higher animal?

Don't deny the existence of traffic construction and its necessity and enthusiasm because of a car accident.

I believe that the opponent's defense friend doesn't want to get a cold or get sick. But sometimes you just catch a cold. The environmental problem is like a cold, no one wants it to happen, but it has already appeared, and we should try to protect it as much as possible. Take care of it.

Destruction is one-sided, protection is common, in order to survive, understand the environment, distinguish concepts, admit it, you are the protector of the environment.

We have also seen patches of dense forests and verdant meadows appear in the desert of the great northwest of our country. The environmental problems have been alleviated to a certain extent. Environmental problems cannot be solved overnight, they are global, and they need to be highly valued and protected by people around the world. ？

I would like to ask the opponent to understand what the factory does to produce clothes. It's to keep human beings warm, but what is the factory doing to produce food? It's to keep humans from starving.

What do humans do when they cut down trees, to build houses and furniture for them? If humans do all these so-called destruction of the environment, then do you still have clothes to wear? And food to satisfy hunger?

Can you still sit here and debate?

So is it too unjust for the other party to say that human beings are the destroyers of the environment?

It is undeniable that the example of human damage to the environment cited by the opposing side is an objective fact, but we, as human beings, cannot erase the leading role and protection of the environment by human beings.

The first article of the Rio Declaration of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992: Human beings are at the center of sustainable development, and they are known as healthy and rich creatures who live in harmony with nature.

As early as the Ice Age, when the glaciers were back and forth, the major climate changes that occurred during the re-fluctuation of the glaciers lasted for thousands of years, upsetting the balance of ecosystems and endangering many living beings (such as dinosaurs). Of course not, because humans didn't exist at that time. In other words, if human beings do not exist, the natural world will still be destroyed.

On the contrary, if there is no creation and maintenance of human beings, the earth is still a barbaric era, how can there be such a convenient social environment to live in, how can we have such a developed food, clothing, housing and transportation today, how can we have so much leisure to develop hobbies?

So human beings are the protectors of the environment.

Not to mention the "three wastes" emitted by human beings, it can be said that human beings' demand for the earth's resources is unrestrained.

Indiscriminate deforestation of plants – deforestation and the fall of trees one by one, resulting in a sharp decline in forests, soil erosion, and accelerated land desertification; Animals are also indiscriminately hunted and killed - humans love to eat shark fin, and sharks, the overlord of the ocean, are facing an existential crisis; Human beings love to eat poisonous snakes, and cobras, five-step snakes, and sea snakes have all become soaking materials; Human beings love to eat wild beasts, and bear's paws, monkey brains, and pangolins are all on the table; Humans love to eat birds, and those birds that soar in the sky cannot escape the clutches of humans. Not to mention tiger bones, bear bile, deer antler velvet, ivory, rhinoceros horn, crocodile skin, etc., all of which have become the objects of human raiding.

Human beings are also endlessly plundering minerals - in order to obtain gold, silver, copper, iron, coal, oil, diamonds, jade and other minerals, human beings dig wildly, blow up mountains and quarry, and over time, the earth becomes "osteoporosis".

In short, human beings are parasites on the earth, so how can we talk about "protectors"?

Humans should be the biggest destroyers of the environment.

At the same time, it is also a destroyer of the environment.

Is humanity the protector of the environment doing its duty? No, the destruction of vegetation, the pollution of rivers, which one is not done by people? The protector has become a destroyer, which is heartbreaking, this is eating the food of the ancestors to create the sins of the descendants.