Regarding the determination of responsibility for traffic accidents, I would like to ask for answers

Lights-controlled intersection turns to go straight is based on the same release signal. It is not the same release signal, it should indeed be the next round of green light to be released, and the car that was released to the first round of green light should be allowed to go first, regardless of turning or going straight at this time.

As far as you have said, the key point in this accident should be the question of whether both sides strictly follow the traffic lights. Generally, the signal lights of the light-controlled intersection will set up green flashing or yellow flashing signals at different times between signal conversion according to the size of the intersection and the traffic environment, so as to stagger the traffic flow in different directions of each round, so there will generally be no intersection between the traffic flows in different directions, otherwise what is the use of the signal light setting?

Of course, it cannot be ruled out that the intersection signal light is unreasonable, and it is not excluded that the other party violates the signal light indication to pass. In the case that your speed is not much different from the speed of the other person, if you do have a green light, the possibility of the other person violating the signal light indication is too great. Of course, it is also possible that the other party does have a green light to enter, but the speed is too much slower than yours or the other party is blocked by other vehicles after entering the intersection, resulting in a conflict between the two parties.

To be honest, the police's determination is taken for granted and not rigorous enough. However, you are also negligent in your observations. Small accidents don't have to be tangled up.

1. There is no scientific basis for the police's claims. The green light turns red and there is a yellow light in front of it. Without a light control record, it is impossible to determine whether the party ran a red light or not.

2. There should be corresponding indication signs on the road surface. 3. There is no such provision at the light-controlled intersection, and the signal light instructions are obeyed. 4. Generally speaking, the other party should run the signal light.

Determined by signal.

Call the police, and the traffic police will issue a letter of responsibility, and if you have any objections to the certificate, you can also file a reconsideration. If it doesn't work, sue. Now you say that these things are useless, everything has to be proven, and besides, you must have the qualifications to be recognized.

Please report to the police in time, and the traffic police will determine the responsibility.

It should be investigated and collected by the traffic police.

The traffic police have the responsibility to investigate and collect evidence, and under normal circumstances, they will not determine your sister's responsibility for the accident because your sister is a passenger. The determination of liability varies from province to province. I don't know where you can't tell accurately.

Didn't call the police, if the police were called, the traffic police would definitely investigate and make a determination of the accident.

I am very sad to see your post, and I hope that your family can mourn and change.

First of all, your sister is not at fault, and both his co-workers and the big truck driver have a lot of responsibility.

Your sister is not at fault, and I think the driver of the electric car and the driver of the large truck should bear full responsibility in this traffic accident. The 120 theory is responsible, but it's not easy to do.

The landlord said that the problem is too unclear.

1. The other party's vehicle occupies your lane. (Except for wrong-way driving, between motor vehicles and non-motor vehicles, there is no other occupation!) ）

2. The other party did not return to his own lane If it is driving in the opposite direction and the other party is not a non-motorized vehicle, you should be following the rear of the other party's vehicle.

3. Hit the direction of the inside hand Can I think that you hit the direction to the right? No matter which direction you're going to the right, it's impossible to get into the opposite lane. So I can tell that you're on at least a two-way four-lane road, and you're driving in the driving lane or overtaking lane from west to east (possibly in either direction).

The rear vehicle overtakes and merges into your lane, and then you want to overtake from the other lane, but the front vehicle merges into his lane that you want to overtake and thus an accident occurs. Right?

4. If the situation is the same as the above 3, it depends on the collision position between your car and the other party's car, as well as the parking position of the other party's vehicle. If both your car and the other car are in the lane without a line and your front collides with the rear of the other person's car, you are solely responsible. According to you, it is likely that he forcibly merged the line responsible, you did not judge the safety distance responsible!

One person and half responsibility!!

It's hard to say, and it's likely that you're stealing the road unless there are other driver-witness witnesses or footage from the road.

According to the landlord, both sides are at fault, and how to divide who is big and who is small depends on the specific situation and the identification of the traffic police force.

Equal Responsibility. You take improper measures.

There are thousands of roads, and the first article of safety is the knowledge of the division of responsibility for traffic accidents that must be known for May Day travel.

Article 93 of the Regulations for the Implementation of the Road Traffic Safety Law of the People's Republic of China The traffic management department of the public security organ shall make a traffic accident identification certificate within 10 days from the date of the investigation of the scene of the traffic accident after the investigation and inspection of the scene. Where it is necessary to conduct an inspection or appraisal, a traffic accident determination shall be made within 5 days of the date on which the results of the inspection or appraisal are determined. Article 39 of the Provisions on Procedures for Handling Traffic Accidents The traffic management department of the public security organ shall appoint or entrust professional and technical personnel and qualified appraisal institutions to conduct inspection and appraisal within five days from the date of investigation of the scene.

Inspections and appraisals shall be completed within 20 days; If it is necessary to extend, it may be extended for 10 days with the approval of the traffic management department of the public security organ of the city divided into districts. If the inspection and appraisal cycle exceeds the time limit, it shall be reported to the provincial people's public security organ traffic management department for approval. Explanation:

1. For traffic accidents that do not require inspection or appraisal, the public security organ shall make a traffic accident identification document within 10 days from the date of investigation of the scene; 2. For traffic accidents that require inspection and appraisal, the public security organs shall generally make a traffic accident identification certificate within 30 days from the date of investigation of the scene; Upon approval, it can be extended for 10 days. If it needs to be extended, it must be approved by the traffic management department of the provincial public security organ.