If you had a second child, would you agree to take your wife s last name?

I think of course it can, the mother is an only child, and the child born is one with the father and the other with the mother. I think it's okay, it's human nature.

Two people decide together, and whoever has the surname can do it. And the surname does not naturally belong to the man, I think men need to have this awareness, the surname of the man and the surname of the woman need to be discussed, not the surname of the woman needs to be discussed.

I think the child's surname is father or mother, as for the final surname, this should be discussed by the young couple, according to the couple's own reasons and the surrounding environment, the interests of the child's growth are the first.

I also discussed this with Xiansen, because the first child gave birth to a daughter, and if the second child still gave birth to a daughter, he would directly give me the surname, and if it was a son, then change the boss to my surname, and I agreed!

It's a choice and a right. Personally, I think that to support a woman with a surname is actually a fight for this kind of child, and when the surname is a man, the husband will discuss the right with his wife.

Just like if you want to redecorate or add large items to your home, one party will consciously discuss this with the other half. That's why I think women fight for surnames, because children are common and of course need to be decided by both parties.

It's 2018, advocating equality between men and women, and building a modern socialist country. What's not to do. It's all parents. What age is it now. Right.

For example, if the wife is pregnant and gives birth to a child, the husband and his wife discuss and say, "You are very fortunate to have a child, the child should have your surname, and the child's surname is your surname and mine, and we all love him the same."

It's just that the general environment here is a man, and I'm afraid that children will be exposed to colored eyes when they grow up, which is not conducive to growth, and I don't want to be ridiculed.

I don't care what they say, but it's annoying like a fly. So do you want your child to have my last name? "I think most women would agree, or at least I certainly would.

Boys and men have surnames, and girls have surnames with women.

If your wife is also an only child, after giving birth to the second child, let the child follow the wife's surname, and the two children should not be called grandma, all of them should be called grandma. When your mother-in-law gave birth to her second child, she asked your mother-in-law to take care of her as much as possible, and your wife also gave the second spring child to her mother-in-law after work.

I have to agree.

At the same time, I hope that my wife will have a few more children, so that both parties will have at least one son and one daughter under their surnames, so that the mission of inheriting the family bloodline can be fully reflected.

Don't worry about raising children, the elderly on both sides will voluntarily pay their pensions to pay tribute to the growth of the third-generation family heirs.

Personally, I would agree, one with the father's surname, the other with the mother's surname, Yuanxing, especially the woman's family, only has this one daughter, of course, I will hope that a child will follow the woman, which is very reasonable, and I will inherit the woman's family property in the future.

If your wife proposes a second child with her surname, you should agree with both hands, and if you don't agree, because the first child is already your surname.

I can accept my wife's request to have a few more, one with the father's surname, and the other Wang Sen with the mother's surname, there were fewer children in the past, so the woman will be trapped in the shed and hope that one will follow the mother's surname, which is acceptable, and now the marriage is equal.

First of all, I must agree with the child's surname and wife, and modern town marriages are based on equal marriages. Of course, the wife also has the right to ask for the child's surname to be her own. Whether the child's surname is with the father or the mother, the child is your own, isn't it?

The head of the Imperial Hall: When the children grow up, they will also support you.

A child's name is just a title. Don't worry too much, what age is it now! Don't be so feudal.

If there is a family that wants a second child, it is the best. One has my father's surname and the other has my mother's surname, which is not very good. They are still relatives (brothers) or relatives (brothers and sisters), and they are still related by blood.

In the law, there is no clear provision that the child's surname must be with the father, right? Women conceive in October, go through hard work to give birth, confinement, and raise children to grow up, without merit and hard work, and women certainly have the right to do so.

Like my husband and I, we discussed before we got pregnant, if it was a boy, it would take my surname, if it was a girl, it would take his surname, and we would decide the moment the child was born.

What is the child's last name? Everyone is willing to keep this promise!

So, I think if a wife in a family asks for a child with her last name, I think it's possible!

If the wife asks for the child to have her surname, I don't think there is anything that can be old, since it can be with a man's surname, it must also be with a woman's surname, and in some cases, it is even reasonable.

From ancient times to the present, men have played a very important role in both the family and society. Modern society advocates equality between men and women, but many phenomena still reveal the idea that men are in a dominant position. For example, the right to have a surname, and the child follows his father's surname to serve the source of the absolute.

If the woman asks for the child and her surname, this is not an excessive matter.

In fact, the right to bear the surname and interests are closely related, and the inheritance of the surname is related to the division of the property of the original family. If this is an interest in the family relationship, it is not necessary for the child to have the father's last name if necessary. Some men want to marry the only daughter of the city, especially some girls from wealthy families, so that the property of the father-in-law and mother-in-law will belong to the man's surname after marriage.

For some men with ulterior motives, this is really a big bargain. At this time, the mother's surname can often protect the rights and interests of women. In other words, the right to a surname is not just a matter of male dominance, there are many stakes involved behind it.

It is normal for some men to accept that their children do not have their surnames, after all, there are more things involved, and throughout the ages, the right to have a surname seems to have been in the hands of men, and it is a bit difficult for some men to give up and be a special group of people. However, this matter is not without room for acceptance. Leaving aside the rights and interests in terms of property division under special circumstances, there is really nothing to argue with whose surname it is.

Many worldly problems are created by man himself because of greed. The problem itself doesn't seem to be a loss, and the other side doesn't do much good. In addition, it is more and more common in many urban families to have both the parent's surname, or the father's surname and the mother's surname.

There's nothing wrong with that. After all, it is legally permissible for a child to take his father's surname, or his mother's surname.

It's just that most people don't want their children to let their mother's surname.

Of course, there are some ethical things, for example, after the man pays a high bride price, the woman has to let the child take the mother's surname, which is a bit excessive, and it is unreasonable to say. After all, like a high bride price, there are some suspicions of selling daughters.

Under the normal bride price, it doesn't matter.

In addition, if the woman's status is strong, the mother's family is powerful, and the man's family is relatively ordinary, in this case, it is normal for the woman to make this request, because this can give the child a better background. Because the child's surname is the mother's surname, it represents the identity of the mother's family, which is the status of the birth (better than the obscure father). This is a more realistic problem.

Let's negotiate between the two sides.

Nowadays, many women have to compete for the right to have a surname. Many women want to take their own children with their surnames. This one will work too. If you give birth to a son, and the son then has a son, whose surname will your grandson have?

This is an unsolvable question, if you follow your logic, you should follow your daughter-in-law's surname, can your daughter-in-law have the same surname as you? Your son has married a daughter-in-law. For example, if your surname is Zhang and you marry a daughter-in-law surnamed Wang, then your son's son.

Is it surnamed Zhang or Wang? If the surname is Zhang, isn't that the surname with your son? That, again, violates women's rights.

If your grandson's surname is Wang, then he will not have the same surname as you. Therefore, it is basically an endless cycle for a child to be born with the mother's surname. It doesn't make sense logically.

In fact, most women are more reasonable and do not make this excessive request. A very small number of women's so-called feminists propose that they should take their surnames when they have children. 99% of children born to women take their father's surname, and this has been the case for thousands of years.

This has been the rule since ancient times.