Why aren t there such great scientists as Newton Einstein now?

Because Newton and Einstein are geniuses that are rare in a thousand years, and there are few such talents now, there are no great scientists like Newton and Einstein now.

Because in the context of Newton's and Einstein's time, everyone is still in a stage where everything in the world is theoretically created from nothing, but it is very difficult to innovate on this basis.

In fact, there are famous and outstanding scientists in modern times, and the main reason why they are not known is because their stories are not strong. A scientist's popularity depends heavily on the spread of stories, and most scientists prefer to keep their heads down and work hard, so although there are many top scientists in this world, their names are mostly unknown to outsiders.

If Einstein, Newton was born in today's society, it would not have much influence, because the times are different.

Why are there no more scientific gods like Albert Einstein and Newton?

Now that the cows are not boasting, and there is no love, where can I find scientists?

If my article "Light Waves" has an 80% accuracy rate, I am Copernicus, and if the next three articles that are going to be published have an 80% accuracy rate, I am Einstein.

Science solves problems that are easy to solve, and the more problems that follow, the more difficult it is to solve.

When things develop to a certain extent, it is enough to have one such scientist. The more the reaction will be.

Because science is over, and the age of science is coming.

Because there are so many great scientists right now.

There are not too many people of the level of Newton and Einstein.

Science is a pyramid, and the higher you go, the more refined you are.

Now they are all small fresh meat, traffic stars, but no one cares about scientists!

Because China has not yet made a force.

It's hard to go from 0 to 1, but it's easy with 1

Newton, give you a mobile phone, will you use it?

How they became great scientists.

Judging from the current situation, the contributions of Newton and Einstein are very huge, and if they are really to be ranked, they should be tied for first place, and it is impossible to determine who is the first person.

Because the theories of these two people have changed the direction of our research and the way of life that followed, in the sense, both of them have influenced the development of the world, and in terms of the degree of influence, I personally think that Einstein may have been a little bigger, but this is not enough to erase the credit of Newton.

But looking at the research direction of these two people, I think Einstein should be able to go slightly further than Newton's card, because Newton couldn't find the answer in science after that, so he began to study theology, and those things in theology are ethereal, but Einstein believed in science all his life, so Einstein's ability may be slightly higher than Newton's.

Newton, who invented the reflecting telescope and the principle of dispersion of light, is known as the "father of modern physics".

In his 1687 Laws of Nature, Newton described gravitation and the three laws of motion. These descriptions laid the foundation for the scientific view of the physical world for the next three centuries and became the basis for the judgment of modern engineering.

By demonstrating the consistency between Kepler's laws of planetary motion and his theory of gravity, it is shown that the motion of terrestrial objects and celestial bodies follows the same laws of nature. It provided strong theoretical support for the heliocentric theory and promoted the scientific revolution.

In mechanics, Newton clarified the principle of conservation of momentum and angular momentum and proposed Newton's laws of motion. Optically, he invented the reflecting telescope and developed a theory of color based on the observation that a prism diverges white light into the visible spectrum. He also systematically formulated the law of cooling and studied the speed of sound.

Who is the greatest in the history of human science Newton is better than Albert Einstein.

Einstein. There is no figure in the history of human science who shines more brightly than Newton and Einstein. Who is more "great"? According to the results of an online poll released by the Royal Society on the 23rd, Newton seems to weigh more than Einstein in the minds of scientists and the general public.

Newton won across the board.

In order to compare Newton and Einstein's status in people's minds, the Royal Society conducted an online poll of more than 1,300 ordinary people and 345 Royal Society scientists. The survey question is twofold: Which of the newtons or Einstein made a greater contribution to science in the circumstances of the time?

Which one has a greater positive impact on humanity? The results on the evening of the 23rd showed that in this competition, Einstein "lost completely". For the first question, the general public believes that Newton, who founded calculus and discovered the law of universal gravitation, contributed more to science.

In the voting results of 345 scientists, Newton's advantage was more obvious, and those who believed that his contribution to science was more important. As for the second question, Newton still won by the vote of the people and the vote of the scientists. As a result, Newton won across the board.

The Tangerine and Apple Controversy.

Although the dust has settled on the debate about "who is greater", experts do not seem to be convinced. It is not easy to truly and comprehensively compare the greatness of two giants of science, they argue, and the answer is simply not so absolute. Robert May, president of the Royal Society, commented on the "who is greater" debate:

I believe many people agree that comparing Newton and Einstein is as difficult to conclude as comparing which one is better, an apple or an orange. The significance of this debate is that it is an opportunity to detail the subtleties of the two physicists and the wide-ranging and far-reaching impact they have had on the world, far beyond the laboratory and scientific calculus. ”

Although both of them are outstanding and I have great respect for Einstein, I personally think Newton is greater than Einstein.

1. In terms of physics, Newton established classical mechanics (most of the mechanical problems in our life can be solved with it), and his theory of optics is also very outstanding, Newton should be said to be the originator of physics in the "true sense". Einstein's main achievement of the theory of relativity is the "improvement" of Newtonian mechanics, in this sense Newton is greater than Einstein, of course, Einstein has many achievements, such as the explanation of the photoelectric effect. To use a perhaps inappropriate analogy, Newton is like the ancestor of a sect, while Einstein is the most prominent of all.

Second, although mathematics is not considered a science, I have to mention Newton's calculus, which is a very good tool for physics, so it is a contribution to science, and Einstein does not seem to have contributed much to mathematics (I have the impression that this is the case).

Newton, Einstein said: he stood on the shoulders of giants, that is, without Newton's success, Einstein could not have succeeded.

Einstein was greater, and Einstein made a lot of things famous.

It's all a guess here, do you really understand their contributions? You are, whoever you like looks like, you can say who is great. There is a bias with an extremely low IQ. Eistan is awesome!

Newton, of course.

Newton was a great English mathematician, physicist, astronomer, and natural philosopher.

Newton's major contributions include the invention of calculus, the discovery of the law of universal gravitation and classical mechanics, the design and actual construction of the first reflecting telescope, etc., and is known as the greatest and most influential scientist in human history. Albert Einstein was the greatest physicist of the 20th century.

All of them have made irreplaceable contributions to the progress of science.

Newton, of course, and when you think about it, the year before last there was another contest for the greatest scientists, and Newton won by a wide margin. And the first scientist I heard as a kid was Newton! I'm more supportive of Newton.

All are great, and all are of epoch-making significance.

"The greatest" is often only in the human heart, and this is a proposition that cannot be quantified.

They don't have to insist on distinguishing who is greater.

There is no greatest, only greatness.

The greatest scientists were Nikola Tesla, Newton, Darcy Van, and not Einstein.

In fact, it doesn't matter who is great, what matters is their great invention! You're not in a tangle, are you、、、

This kind of problem should be studied in depth, and it is estimated that writing a ** may not be clear, history, culture, education, and system all have certain reasons!

The two eras experienced by Newton and Einstein were precisely the beginning and end of the Qing Dynasty, and from the perspective of the entire discovery process of the Qing Dynasty, the policy of closing the country to the outside world has always been pursued, which has also caused a certain degree of backwardness!

Please enter**Description However, how many great scientists like Newton and Einstein are there in the world?

The development of science pays more attention to the general environment and continuous accumulation, and the Western world is deeply influenced by Greek philosophy and mythological thought, and in human history, philosophy and theology are an important part of the formation of scientific thought! At the same time, the Renaissance also gave the Western world a great baptism of thought!

The emergence of Newton and Einstein is not accidental, it can be said to be inevitable, it is the "inevitable product" of the accumulation of science and technology to a certain extent, even if there is no Newton and Einstein, there will be others who will replace them!

Therefore, it is not denied that Newton and Einstein are indeed great enough, but to overemphasize their greatness is to "blasphemy" science, because science is never the credit of any one person, and any discovery in the history of science is inseparable from the efforts of their predecessors!

In other words, how long has our real science developed and accumulated?

The development of science is the most important thing to accumulate, and at the same time, it is more important to change people's traditional way of thinking and their own attitude towards science.

The Chinese civilization has lasted for thousands of years, and many historical celebrities have emerged in it. These celebrities have also created a lot of useful things for our country and have left a rich legacy for our children and grandchildren. So since there have been so many great celebrities, why haven't there been such outstanding and world-famous scientists as Newton, Leonardo da Vinci, Stella, and Einstein?

First of all, China's ** culture has always been closed to the outside world, and people are exposed to their own culture. Then their minds are all in contact with domestic things, and they lack understanding of new things in other countries, so they have no innovative thinking in their minds. Unlike Western countries, their countries will send their own envoys to other countries to learn things that cannot be learned in their own country, coupled with modest Confucian cultural thoughts, some of them are also low-key and hidden, unwilling to let others know.

The human brain has unlimited development potential, when exposed to new things, the mind will be opened, and at the same time, one's own learning ability will be strengthened in the continuous learning process. Therefore, there are so many great scientists in Western countries, which has a lot to do with the leadership of a country, and learning this matter is an indispensable part of life in Western countries. In the same way, they have an enterprising spirit in their hearts, which will become an inexhaustible motivation in their hearts.

We can know from scientific online reports that those scientists in Western countries who are different from ordinary people have received a good education since childhood, as well as the discipline of their parents, and they are full of expectations for their future. In addition, most of the celebrities such as Newton and Leonardo da Vinci were born in special times, and the country was unable to protect itself and could only rely on the people to change, and they had to find a way to make some achievements under the pressure of reality. Not only has it brought itself social status but also the supreme glory it has brought to its family, but our country is basically in a situation of great unification, and engineering is not so important, and the ancients were humble and euphemistic, even if there was a good invention, it was directly put into use, and it would not be fanfare and boasting, and it might care about the reputation of the academic community, but in ancient times, there were few readers, so the popularity was not high.

For China, since the unification of China by the Qin Emperor, it has bid farewell to the situation of long-term land fragmentation. Among the powerful dynasties established later, there were both heys and declines. The people's pursuit of their own food and clothing is only limited, especially in the Ming and Qing dynasties, and the country is a happy scene.

Therefore, for the people, they are used to living this kind of life of national peace and security, and they can't experience a country's sense of crisis, so they don't have the consciousness to change, and even want to create a great cause that shocks the world, but despite this, the four major inventions that promote the development of science and technology in the world are also from our country.

Secondly, there are also certain cultural differences between countries. There is also a difference in the policies implemented by the country in its own country, and Western countries encourage people in their own countries to pursue what they want, rather than blindly relying on the prosperity of the country to meet their own requirements, and China is different from them in this regard, which is one of the reasons why China cannot produce such excellent scientific researchers.