Social evaluation of civil science

The key to identifying civil science lies in whether there is a scientific spirit, that is, the spirit of "using evidence to prove", rather than the spirit of empty words, the spirit of standing in line, and the spirit of sensationalism. "Because the mixed fruit shell and the sticker bar have been in contact with some civil science. My opinion on civil science is more or less like this.

Many people are very thoughtful people who want to make some achievements, but they don't have enough economic foundation. That is what Mr. Yang Jiang said, "I read too little and think too much". Domestic (including most of the translated foreign books) popular science books, due to the reader's knowledge level, when explaining relatively high-end knowledge such as the theory of relativity, omitting the vast majority of mathematical calculations and expressing them in language, which may give the civil science an illusion that the study of science does not need a mathematical foundation, but it is a pity that higher mathematics is precisely one of the foundations of modern science.

Examples such as Albert Einstein's work at the patent office and Chen Jingrun, including the latest Perelman, give the illusion that civil science can make achievements, but ignore the fact that these figures are not actually detached from the scientific community. ‍‍

The reason why many civil sciences are "civil sciences" and cannot enter the mainstream is that they do not have the patience to study, and they rush to establish all kinds of grand theories, and they want to overthrow the mainstream theories but do not understand what the basis of those theories is. And these people are not ready to admit that they are wrong - this is not the most scientific spirit! Scientists publish in order to gain recognition from their peers, but first they have to be independently tested by their peers, that is, they are prepared to admit that their ideas and results may be wrong.

The purpose of communication between scientists is mainly to test and criticize, not to praise each other.

Their spirit of pursuing science is still commendable, but they do not have scientific thinking and methods, and this thing still needs to be popularized.

First of all, the civil science here is not those who sell their fame and reputation, but those who are really interested in researching science. They may not be able to receive a good education because of their early experiences or the financial strength of their own families. But then they discover the importance of knowledge, and they are really interested in science, and they have certain qualifications (that is, enough IQ), then they can get a good education again, and they will definitely become real scientists.

At first, it referred to non-official non-governmental scientists outside China's system, and later extended to refer to scientists whose research topics do not belong to their own professional fields or who have not obtained a doctorate degree in their research fields. That is, amateur scientists. Can an amateur become a regular?

Yes, if you study hard, get a doctorate, and then make a living from scientific research, you can definitely become a scientist. But if you keep posting sensational articles or even rumors on the Internet, then you won't be a scientist. The attitude of science is rigorous, so although the Internet is full of rumors, most scientists will not pay attention to it, and they do not have time to pay attention to it.

Because there are too many trolls on the Internet, and their strategy is that as long as someone opposes it, they don't care about scolding first. It's very frustrating. The growth of civil science shows that the learning atmosphere of the people is good, but now there are too many rumors, too many pseudo-civil science, too many are the interests behind it, the Internet makes the cost of rumors too low, and the cost of refuting rumors is too high, and too many people choose to believe what they want to believe regardless of whether it is correct or not. ‍

There are many folk science enthusiasts who are also experts in other fields, but they are engaged in different professions, science and technology and the progress of mankind are related to all mankind, it cannot be said that non-majors cannot study other disciplines, and the so-called mistakes of various scientists emerge in an endless stream, understanding them is also vanity, stealing concepts in scientific theories, fooling the people, since the beginning of human history, no one dares to say that he is a mentor or pioneer who leads the development of human civilization, And no one dares to say that he is the only one who is qualified to study a certain field! Have a voice! Absolutely, ......Absolutely, ......Absolutely, ......The vast majority of people have an average IQ and worship a certain scientist as a god, as the saying "Truth and truth are always in the hands of a few", please respect everyone who contributes to humanity, no matter what profession he is!!

Human beings should encourage the use and development of folk wisdom and genius, that is, civil science must occupy a place in human scientific research, so it is recommended that the state set up private scientific research, and select and reward it every year.

Civil science has great advantages in building a human knowledge system: unrestrained, pure power, open-mindedness, freewheeling, no interference, no need for large devices and experiments, and it is equally convenient to obtain information online. The key to scientific research is that people's thinking is strong, and the real civil science has advantages.

Probably, after they are educated, they know how funny their theories are. Some bigwigs know what science is, and they come to their own conclusions through countless meticulous and scientific experiments, which is really awesome. But there are those who feel like they've discovered something new when they think about it.

The limitation of this thing is not only knowledge, but also IQ, I always feel that I am the smartest in the world, I don't know how smart a person who can't even get into college is smart, I, a student in 1985, feel stupid to ......death all day longIf science were so good, there wouldn't be so many graduate students who couldn't finish their studies, and besides, professors at good universities didn't care about one or two of your articles, and there were one or two seats, so there was no need to grab space with you.

First of all, non-civil science is not necessarily a good scientist, but at least it is not a self-absorbed type of intellectual retardation in the name of science. Secondly, people tend to treat many self-righteous intellectual disabilities as civil science. For example, someone who claims to have invented a perpetual motion machine, who thinks that he can make a cheap and safe flying machine with a 125 motorcycle engine (less than 10 horsepower), who thinks he has invented an anti-cancer drug.

Finally, don't always go for artificial obstacles! Tesla, for example, never thought that anyone else could define whether he was a scientist or not. He repeatedly turned down the Nobel Prize.

If according to the opinion of these self-righteous mean-spirited ghosts in China, is Tesla considered a civil science?

Some people do belong to the self-boasting, self-absorbed paranoid personality. And most don't have a formal undergraduate education. I don't understand the basic truth that the art industry has specialization.

There are many idlers in China, and they despise the trend to gain a sense of superiority, for example, if you join a popular technology hobby group, there will be a specialist who scolds you for civil science, obviously enthusiasts are not divided into professional civil sciences, and those who have good deeds have to come out of the entire professional civil science class.

"Loving science is not a bad thing, but there are strict norms for scientific research. The so-called "scientific research" engaged in by "civil science" is fundamentally different from real scientific research.

Civil science now refers exclusively to people who have not undergone professional scientific education and refuse to accept scientific theories, and make theories with cranky ideas, including those who talk nonsense in order to become famous. A person who has studied the theory of professional scientific knowledge is generally called a scientist.

It is unscientific to artificially distinguish between the practice and theory of human exploration of the mysteries of the universe as a civilian science and an academy, and it is directly related to the knowledge achievements of human civilization in the field of study, and has no direct relationship with academic qualifications.

The real civil science is that although he studies the problem alone, he does not derail from the world, and he will buy scientific magazines every month and participate in seminars in various places (countries), which is called a citizen scientist. Of course, there is another kind, which is more reasonable to call folk metaphysicians.

Science is based on rational understanding based on phenomena and data, through logic, reasoning and deduction. The main difference between "civil science" and science lies in whether or not scientific attitudes and methods are used to solve problems.

The heliocentric theory is the civil science. The sun is not the center of the universe.

In today's world, civil science should belong to amateur scientific hobbyists who do not do their jobs, or scientific workers who do not have a salary. Or a person who is a scientist outside the orthodox system of scientific inquiry.

How is it evaluated? Seek truth from facts, good is good, evil is evil, civil science has no status, no need to be ashamed of adults.

This statement of the civil science is a Chinese Wu oak-style lie, just like the Chinese style of crossing the road, it is a manifestation of the Chinese people who do not abide by the rules and are dishonest, and everyone is accustomed to telling lies since childhood, and the Chinese say that some amateurs who do not understand basic scientific knowledge put forward cases of violating a certain scientific law are put forward by all amateurs, and promote them everywhere as a joke, turning a blind eye to the scientifically valuable opinions put forward by many Chinese amateur science enthusiasts that do not violate any scientific laws. And keep your mouth shut. Blind attention is also given to the views put forward by academic authorities that violate the laws of science and cause great damage to the state and society. For example, China's authoritative air force medical experts have published a large number of ** that violates Newton's second law, the psychoanalytic theory proposed by Freud that violates the principles of psychology, and now the authoritative ** plate squeeze theory that violates the **** principle.

For the comments of amateur science enthusiasts, the comments of people in Western countries are completely opposite to those of Chinese, and people in Western countries believe that amateur science enthusiasts can often find their own way and achieve unexpected achievements in science, which is the big truth. For example, Father Mendel's theory of biological genetics, Fermat's law of mathematics discovered by lawyer Fermat, and so on.