There is a necessary link between academic performance and moral cultivation 45

Answer]: a, b, c, e

abce [Analysis] This question examines the relationship between morality and morality. Their direct roots are different: moral character is the abbreviation of moral character, the embodiment of social morality in the individual, and the relatively stable psychological characteristics and tendencies that individuals show when they act according to the social moral behavior norms set by the smile; Morality is a social phenomenon unique to human beings, and it is the sum of behavioral norms or norms produced by a certain society in order to adjust the mutual relationship between people.

This sentence is not true, academic performance is the student's learning situation, the student's academic performance is good, and other aspects will not be much worse, and the academic performance is poor, and other aspects are not much better.

This statement is not true. School education is not only about learning knowledge, but also about teaching students how to be human beings. Only when students learn to be human beings and learn to do things can they become well-rounded people.

This statement is not true. The moral character of students is not only expressed in their studies, but also in their lives. A student of high quality will not only have good academic performance, but will also have good qualities in other aspects, such as:

Honesty and trustworthiness, respect for teachers and friends, unite classmates, help others, take care of public facilities, etc.

1. I think it depends on personal values, I personally think that ideology and morality are very important to a person, and I think this is not directly related to learning morality. Good academic performance does not necessarily mean good moral character. Grades are just a tool to measure the effectiveness of learning.

2. Whether a teacher can become an educator is actually related to the teacher himself. Every teacher hopes that the class they teach is the best, the results are the best, it is inevitable to be strict with students, bystanders are clear, although strict teachers produce high apprentices, but many teachers can not understand the essence of education, think that strict will have an effect, in fact, otherwise, now many students have a rebellious mentality, things must be reversed, so if teachers want to become educators, they must rationally reflect on their own education methods, consider what is the best teaching method, properly guide students, and step by step.

If it's not an interview question, it should be considered so;

First, many of our teachers are problematic, they don't learn traditional Chinese culture, they learn the West, it's okay to learn the West, but they learn the dregs of Western culture. Teachers can't lead by example, and we can imagine what our students can learn.

Second, there is a problem with our education system, Chiang Kai-shek once said that schools are not yamen, but our current schools are all yamen, and teachers have become businessmen who sell their diplomas.

Third, there is a problem in our social atmosphere, and academics have become empty talk, when teachers want to be a headmaster, and when a principal wants to be a headmaster, they want to be a headmaster. The governor wants to be a sycophant to become a county magistrate. China's society has not yet undergone the baptism of capitalism, and rights are regarded as very important.

Society is like this, how can they become educators?

1. This is everyone's different point of view, I don't think there is a necessary relationship, and I don't know if there is an indirect relationship.

Answer: The main way to improve and acquire ethics and talents is definitely learning.

That's a good question.

I think people are born with a sense of morality, and then they can be optimized and improved through acquired learning.