Ask for English grammar questions for high scores! modal verb subjunctive mood time urgency is goo

He rarely listens to others. He should be held accountable for what he has done.

answer for. Be responsible, bear it. the consequences;

shall is used in conjunction with he, she, they, you, it, etc., to express the meaning of must, must be, for example: you shall not get away with thisYou must not take this thing with you.

It would be nice if I knew how to operate a computer like you do.

if only. How good, use a subjunctive mood;

This sentence does not have the meaning of "past past", it is enough to use the simple past tense.

1.The virtual tense should be equivalent to the tense of the previous main clause, where wish is the simple present tense, and if you are one in advance, choose slept.

2.I think both are fine, probably because to avoid repeating the previous would, it is more appropriate to choose were to.

3.Exactly what you call a tense in advance.

1 3 o'clock is the same as the one below.

The future tense of the clause guided by if should be used in the past tense is to do or should or the past tense can be a according to the meaning of the sentence

being taken on time，this medicine will be quite effective。This sentence is not true, and the past participle taken should be used directly as an adverbial, because the passive form of the present participle indicates the passive of the ongoing and does not match the meaning of the sentence, so it is wrong.

Original sentence = if this medicine is taken on time, it will be quite effective

finish the project in time，the staff were working at weekends。The main clause uses were, and the use of are can be different tenses.

giving me a sceond chance，i will do it better。This is the independent nominative case of a non-predicate verb.

her can be changed to she The original sentence is to replace the nominative pronoun with the accusative pronoun.

learn a language well，great efforts must be made。This sentence is an adverbial for the infinitive, and the logical subject does not necessarily have to be consistent with the subject, but there is a logical subject, and the logical subject of the infinitive here is the performer of the passive voice, and it may also be consistent with the speaker.

would never come to this restaurant。The book says that the "would" in this sentence is the past to mean the future, and the meaning in the book is that here would is not an auxiliary verb to indicate the past and the future, but a modal verb that expresses a strong desire to mean that I will never come to this restaurant It has nothing to do with the past and the future tense You can also use will.

【Answer】Hello, non-predicate verbs are a difficult point in English grammar, which is a bit difficult to understand, but you will not forget it after understanding.

1，being taken on time，this medicine will be quite effective。This is not true. Being at the beginning should be removed because the whole sentence means that the medicine will be very effective if taken on time.

It can be seen that it does not refer to taking it immediately now, but refers to a habit, which should be taken in the simple present tense.

2，to finish the project in time，the staff were working at weekends。There must be context in this sentence, otherwise I personally feel that there is a certain problem with this expression. Since the emphasis is on at weekends as a long-term habitual action, it should be work.

You go back and look at the context.

3，her giving me a sceond chance，i will do it better。This is an independent nominative structure. her should be changed to she, because it is the nominative case. HER is not right.

4，to learn a language well，great efforts must be made。There is a mistake in this sentence, the subject should be people, not efforts. The logical subject must be consistent.

5，i would never come to this restaurant。The past future tense expresses a future action or trend based on events that took place in the past. No longer going to a restaurant means not going from the past, here it means the past and the future, of course, including the past, present and future, there is no need to think too carefully here, it is just a concept of dividing line.

Non-predicate verbs are the most difficult part of English to understand, communicate more, think more, learn this piece of English will become very interesting after learning, I wish you progress in your studies!

1.Yes, it would be fine to change it to if, let's say, a tense that advances forward in the normal tense.

The description is that it has been carried out for multiple weekends, and if it is an odd number, you can use are.

3.The same can be replaced with an if clause, if you don't use the accusative, you can use if she give.

4.No, take effort to do sth, no need to make.

It's not just about will, it's a phrase with remorse, implying "if only I had never come to this restaurant." Virtual, tense advance.