Do you have any views on the current strict entry and relaxation policies of colleges and universiti

Higher education should be strictly in and out of the country. It means that people who are about to go on to higher education are carefully screened, and then those who receive and can fully apply their knowledge and practice are treated leniently and sent into society. What we mean by wide is not that there are no standards for all talents.

Widening only lowers the bottom line for elite talents to go to society, and it cannot be caused by some other reasons that they cannot enter the society to display their talents. We believe that higher education can bring more elite talents into the society, so that they can give full play to their strengths and be more beneficial to the development of society.

First of all, strict entry and wide exit can maximize the use of the society's resource investment in talent training. Yan Jin's initiative can select the best among the students and give them the best quality education. People with different learning abilities receive the same education, and they will necessarily gain different things.

Why not take a rigorous approach and let them choose the stage that suits them before they even pursue higher education? Higher education requires professional education, and the educated must have a certain degree of understanding and the ability to acquire professional knowledge. The threshold is too low to reduce the quality of talents, the level of talents is uneven, and educational resources will be wasted to a certain extent, so we must take strict measures to ensure that social resources are tilted and made maximum use.

Second, strict entry and wide exit can better ensure the quality of talents receiving higher education. The criteria for selecting talents are strict and for the sake of everyone who has received higher education. Everyone in the world is not an all-rounder, destined to have their strengths and weaknesses, if you are not suitable for this field, but you have to face problems every day that even you don't want to think about, you will gradually dislike learning, and begin to doubt your own ability, so how to become a talent?

Strict entry and wide exit enable talents who are good at various fields to study more deeply and show their ambitions in society. However, the wide entry and strict exit make people of different degrees pour into the same environment, and only ignore the quality of talents in pursuit of so-called equality, which is not conducive to the cultivation of talents. This kind of equality in which everyone has access to higher education is precisely the biggest inequality in talent and education.

Finally, strict entry and wide exit can ensure the efficiency of educating talents. The goal of the university is not to provide compulsory education, but to train high-level professionals with practical and innovative abilities. Strict entry and wide exit can ensure the efficiency of teaching in education, the level of students is roughly the same, and teachers can carry out collective education for students with similar learning ability.

Teachers have to take care of the majority of students and can basically adapt to the pace of teaching, which also leads to the fact that students who learn better have most of the time waiting for the next new content in class, which also reduces the learning efficiency of students.

I think that in the long run, it will be difficult to produce excellent university students, because many people will not study hard when they go to university, and they will not know anything after graduation.

I don't think this is a very good practice, because it will make many children be turned away when they enter the school, and they can't choose their favorite school and receive a better education. And the wide exit will also make the student's daily study not very attentive and unable to go to a better university.

Strict entry and wide exit will lead to students not studying after entering higher education institutions, students are tired of studying hard for college entrance examination scores, and they are unwilling to continue to study hard when entering universities.

It will lead to inequality in education, and at the same time, it will lead to the injustice of the education system. At the same time, it will be too restrictive. And it will also cause too much stress for many students. Such a system is not conducive to the development of students.

In this way, many college students do not learn good knowledge and skills, but it will cause problems for the employment of college students, problems for the work of college students, and affect the gold content of college students.

It will make children waste time during college, do not learn real knowledge, do not have the skills to connect with society, employment is a big problem, resulting in a lot of labor loss.

The strict prohibition of higher education will make students give up self-control after entering higher education, become more and more relaxed, and be unable to adapt to the rhythm of society after entering society.

I don't think this kind of coincidental phenomenon is not optimistic, but it is very stressful that primary and secondary school students should be relaxed appropriately, and universities should also strengthen management.

In fact, the big stuffiness is not for everyone to learn a lot of knowledge, except for some professional knowledge. What we have to learn is some philosophies of life, regret and some common problems after work, so there is not so much pressure.

Although it is a relatively normal phenomenon now, it is for the sake of Qiaoyu to be able to make children study hard when they are young, and it is also to be able to make no wild wide defeat They understand the importance of learning from an early age.

I think this kind of education is better because it allows students to choose different companies.

After all, whether it is a family or a school, after cultivating children, they must be continuously delivered to the society, contribute to our society, and also help our country's progress and development. And there are questions about education,In fact, there is also more or less controversy. For example, for higher education, whether it should be strict in and wide out or should it be wide in and strict out.

Some people think that higher education should be strict in and wide out, and now our society also shows some such trends, for example, some colleges and universities, whether it is high school or university, the more the university that teaches the best, or the university that ranks higher in China, the admission score will be quite high, and the same is true for local high schools. This reflects the rigor of higher education. And wide out, everyone must be familiar with it.

For example, when we go to college, we areThe exam is not very complicated, and you may be able to get good results after only one month of review, and for many universities, all that is required is that you can not fail the course, so that you can graduate smoothly.

How to look at this kind of problem is actually such a strict way in and wide out is wrong, maybe there is no problem with the former, but the latter will have a great hidden danger, some people are actually very nervous in high school life, and after going to college, they are usually far away from their own home. Parents are not around, and teachers at school can't manage every student, so there will always be people who are much more relaxed. Even a lot of people after graduation,I don't have a good grasp of my own professional knowledge.

This is not a good thing for future development and employment, so there are still disadvantages to a certain extent.

Of course, some people will refute that children with strong self-control will achieve quite good results even if they are strict in and out, but not everyone can have this self-controlThis is also why many parents will force their children to study in high school, so it is obvious that strict entry and strict exit can get as many talents as possible.

It is precisely because everyone has a different view of education that today's education system can only fit the habits and learning styles of most people. But anyway,China's educational environment is constantly improving and developing, and the future educational environment will be more perfect and suitable for more students.

I think that higher education should not be strict in and wide out, strict in and wide out will make the training of college students uneven, many college students only have academic qualifications but no ability, higher education should pay more attention to the humanistic quality of students.

Absolutely. Higher education still needs to give students some appropriate relaxation, and strictly prohibiting strict exactness is likely to make students feel a lot of pressure and do some bad things.

In my opinion, higher education should indeed be strict in and wide out, and my view is that in this way, people who are engaged in higher education can be rigorously screened, and then they will be able to accept and fully apply their knowledge to practice. It helps to help the country screen talents.

I think so, because only this kind of strict education will educate particularly good students, so that students can receive higher education, and there is nothing wrong with that.

Yes, I think we should vigorously advocate strict entry and wide exit, which is very good for students and schools, and now the state also recognizes this method.

In this way, many students will relax their learning attitude after entering the school, and gradually develop the habit of laziness and laziness, and the employment pressure of students graduating from these schools will be very great, these students have no way to adapt to the pressure of society, and the ability to resist pressure is particularly small, and they will be particularly confused about the future.

Strict in and wide out. One. From the perspective of China's national conditions and the reality of educational development.

As we all know, Western universities are mainly supported by society, and unlike Western community-based schools, China's current institutions of higher learning are mainly public schools, with limited resources and financial resources. Moreover, at present, when we have not even fully popularized primary and secondary education, if we invest a large amount of limited resources in higher education, the country will not get a good return for its efforts. Moreover, judging from the current situation in our country, we have generally achieved the quantitative goal in terms of the quantity of education, but it is far from sufficient in terms of quality.

Therefore, we should not only optimize the current educational structure in terms of quantity, but also in terms of quality.

2. From the perspective of the contradiction between the supply of qualified personnel and the needs of society. Judging from the current situation of China's society, China's economic development has a limited demand for higher education talents, and a large number of secondary professional and technical personnel are needed. Increasing the number of students enrolled in higher education is not only detrimental to the development of higher education, but also to economic development.

Moreover, most of our students are "one" shaped talents, that is, the average comprehensive level, but lack of "T" shaped talents with professional skills and can better serve the society. Under the premise that we provide students with a good basic level, Kuanyuan can not only allow students to develop their personalities, but also enable students to contact opportunities from more channels, and finally let more talents out of the school with high walls and go to the society with a comprehensive and reasonable pluralistic evaluation system, so as to better serve the society in many aspects and reflect the value of higher education.

Third, from the perspective of the education model itself. Liberal progress means that students with uneven knowledge levels study in the same school, so teachers must lower their teaching standards in order to take into account students with poor foundations, so that the quality of teachers' teaching and students' learning cannot be improved, but colleges and universities have to evaluate students with a strict standard. Not to mention the contradiction between wide in and strict out, even if it is possible, how big should such a difficulty coefficient be?

A good start is half the success, in contrast, our strict progress is built on the basis of wide advance, which not only ensures a good start, promotes the improvement of quality, but also is much more secure.

Chinese universities are strict in and wide out, high school students through intense study, take the college entrance examination, go through all kinds of entry into the university, and what do they learn when they get to the university? Some people feel idleness because of the relaxed environment of the university, so they begin to degenerate and end up with a diploma. On the contrary, American universities are wide in and strict out, ensuring the quality of students.

Personally, I think that it can be done in any way, the main thing is that universities can provide students with things that can be used in practical work, and knowledge needs to be practiced, which can not be done by domestic universities.

Our current higher education system should be wide in and wide out, now the gross admission rate of high school to university has been very high, and there is a shortage of students in individual colleges and universities, it can be said that going to college is no longer a dream, and graduating from college is relatively easy, and generally will not be dissuaded.

However, when the two sessions have recently talked about education, many deputies have proposed the adverse effects of university enrollment expansion in recent years.

The trend in the future is to be strict in and strict out.

As for whether there is a question about the way universities are strict in and wide out, the answer is, of course, questionable.

As we all know, as early as a few years ago, the Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China issued a series of policies to improve the situation, and I remember a sentence that impressed me very much, which made it difficult for students who played games and searched stools in their dormitories all day long to graduate! Therefore, whether it is the Ministry of Education of the country or our parents, we all know that it is difficult to go to college, and it is difficult to get through the single-plank bridge of the college entrance examination, but college is indeed easy, and there are countless students who have spent four years in a muddy way. Suddenly independent from the discipline of teachers, schools, and parents, many students let themselves go, addicted to games, TV, love, etc.

In order to improve the quality of our students, such as canceling the graduation examination and other policies! So in general, strict entry and wide exit need to be changed!

Secondly, the problem of college students' difficulty in finding employment is very broad, not only for personal reasons, but also related to the epidemic and the national economy! First of all, whether the student's ability can match the job, now more and more positions look at the student's academic qualifications, experience, skills, and certificates; Secondly, under the epidemic situation, the country's economy is in a downturn, the capital turnover of enterprises is slow, and it is difficult for small, medium and micro enterprises to protect themselves, so they have to lay off employees and even go bankrupt; Third, there are few jobs, and the number of graduates is increasing year by year, resulting in fewer jobs than jobs, and there are also many young people who are afraid of hardship and fatigue and are unwilling to engage in some difficult and hard work; Finally, the ability is not enough, the funds are insufficient, this is not only the student's own business, the school should also open employment guidance courses, and cooperate with professional-related business units, so that students can gain experience in the process of internship, ** for the entrepreneurial policy to be widely publicized, the best enterprises, schools, **, banks and other multi-pronged efforts to provide good entrepreneurial help!

Therefore, students should study more professional knowledge in college, exercise their comprehensive ability, stay less in the dormitory to play games, watch dramas and waste their youth, so that they can become capable, idealistic, and insightful talents!