Which is more fuel efficient than the Mazda3 1 6 manual or the Focus 1 8 manual?

Of course, the Mazda 3 is fuel-efficient.

In terms of power performance, the Focus has a liter 124 hp L4 engine and liters? 141 hp L4 engine available; In terms of transmission, except for the MTX-75 manual transmission used in the sports version, the rest of the manual models are equipped with IB6 transmission; In addition, the gearbox of the manual transmission model has been changed from the original IB5 to B5A, of which the maximum power of the liter model is 91kW and the maximum torque is 161Nm; The liter model has a maximum power of 104kW and a maximum torque of 180Nm.

So it's definitely better than good, because both the engine and the gearbox are better, but if you buy an automatic wave, the difference is mainly in the engine displacement.

In terms of fuel economy, the fuel consumption of using the Focus to climb the hill with 5 people is definitely higher, have you heard of the cart carrying the cannon? Theoretically, cars with a small displacement are more fuel-efficient, but with the increase in weight, the fuel consumption of a small-displacement car rises rapidly, and it is possible to eventually surpass a car with a higher displacement, but it is not known at which critical point it changes.

Basically, the comprehensive fuel consumption is between 10-11, and about 9 at high speeds; I haven't tried it, but other friends say it's pretty much the same. In addition to fuel consumption, personal driving habits have a lot to do with it, and the good habits can save at least 1 liter of 100 kilometers compared to the bad habits. Personal experience.

I shifted gears above 3000 rpm for a while, and no more than 2000 rpm for a while, and as a result, the latter saved 1 liter of 100 km.

My friends unanimously agreed that if possible, the Focus must be bought with a hand wave, which is a relatively pure professional sports sedan, and the engine, gearbox, and chassis are tuned best. Think about the rest for yourself.

Then, the suspension system is not the same. The wheels are also 16 inches (yes 15 inches). The width of the tires is also different.

The rest is that there is only a yellow color, and there is no yellow color. There is also the steering wheel with a CD control system in the inner room, and there is not. It is a sports seat, that is, the seat has a feeling of holding you.

It's ordinary. Sitting up appears a little taller. Nothing else, nothing else.

T, the same as the gearbox, but the gearbox is a 6-speed manual row, which belongs to the top of the class.

The Octavia consumes less fuel than the Focus.

But I recommend you to buy Fox.

So what's so good about Fox?

1.Handling performance is a highlight, and the solid chassis gives the vehicle excellent driving performance.

2.The occupants have plenty of headroom, and the long wheelbase gives you plenty of room in the rear.

3.The braking is evenly distributed, but due to the soft grip of the front shock, the nodding phenomenon of the brake is more obvious.

4.The European car safety first design years Pisan concept is well reflected.

5.The engine, which uses a variable inertia air intake system, has a technical advantage over other cars in its class.

The use of the chassis has improved the handling of the whole vehicle to a higher level, and it is technically ahead of the competition.

1. In fact, this fuel economy is not absolute, generally speaking: avoid the engine idling for a long time, and avoid sudden braking as much as possible. Use the high and low gears reasonably and maintain the appropriate driving speed.

In general, driving speeds are most fuel-efficient at 80 km/h, increasing fuel consumption by 15% at speeds of 105 km/h and by 25% at 110 to 120 km/h. Keep the vehicle low in wind resistance, try not to load on the roof, or make unreasonable modifications.

2. Do a good job of daily maintenance. Unclean air and oil filters, worn spark plugs, and problematic emission control systems can all increase fuel consumption. According to statistics, it is normal for a poorly maintained engine to increase fuel consumption by 10% or 20%, and an air filter that is too dirty can also lead to a 10% increase in fuel consumption.

3. In order to maintain the best performance of the car, it is best to change the oil every 5000 kilometers and check the filter, which is also very important for the maintenance of the car. If the tire pressure is not enough to maintain a normal tire pressure level, the rolling resistance will increase significantly. Reducing the burden on the car and cleaning up unnecessary things in the trunk can reduce the weight of the car and also achieve the effect of energy saving.

Choose a reasonable access route. When stuck in traffic, the fuel consumption of the car is the maximum.

Both the Ma3 and the Focus are sports models. There is no disputing this.

If they are all displacement, they still have their own merits.

Ma 3 speed up fast, then Focus control better, at a speed of more than 180 kilometers per hour Ma 3 will appear fluttering, and Focus does not, this is the safety of the United States and the main body, the car is heavy, there is a Fox defect, fuel consumption is about 2L higher than the Ma 3.

The Ma 3 is a little better than the Focus in terms of interior. Ma 3 hand hao, it can be said that no one in the same level of car can match, the interior Yan Sen wheel color and workmanship pay more attention to the taste of sports cars, pure black interior and details have been perfect, recognized by many young people, and Fu this stupid letter in the inner room workmanship is by the majority of car friends sigh, 09 inner room slightly improved, but compared to Ma 3 is still a little inferior, this may be the Japanese car interior fine selling point.

In terms of space, the front row space of the Focus is average, and the rear row has a slight advantage, but the 2 boxes have caused a bit of oppression to the selling point of enough space in the rear row, and it is obvious that the headroom is not enough. Although the horse 3 is a 3-box car, the trunk is indeed a bit far-fetched, perhaps for beautification, and does not care about the purpose of the trunk, the box spacing is small, and the opening is very impractical.

On the whole, these two cars have their own merits, have their own selling points and drawbacks, everyone holds the angle of appreciation, don't open your mouth is to boycott Japanese products or something, Accord is a Japanese product, but in the domestic market has been at the peak, Sony, Toshiba are Japanese products, but the Chinese people still recognize. Someone recognizes it to prove that he has a market, and I feel that there is no good or bad car, only suitable for him.

Fox is fuel-efficient.

The Focus engine uses a counter-type.

I-VCT technology.

Mazda doesn't have these things.

And Mazda 626

The engine output is 107kw

The weight of the car is more than a ton.

Relatively speaking, it is already a small horse-drawn cart.

And Fox. Engine output.

The weight of the car. Ton. Absolutely big horse-drawn trolley.

So from the point of view of the user, the Fox is definitely fuel-efficient.

But the fuel consumption of the Mazda 626 is about the same.

It can only be said that Mazda is fuel-efficient.

Mazda is a controlling subsidiary of Ford.

Ford and all of Ford's brands have engine technology in Mazda.

and engine technology.

But the engine that Mazda is using itself is its own technology.

For Ford, after all.

Mazda is Ford's low-end brand positioning.

Ford itself belongs to the mid-range or mid-to-high-end.

Volvo belongs to the high-end.

So in many cases, a lot of things that Mazda gets are not the best.

Ma 3, a very economical car, the appearance is not bad, the interior space is also OK, mainly because the fuel economy is very high, and another point is that its seat length is relatively long, which better releases the interior space.

But the horse's engine power is much worse than the Focus's, of course, the displacement is here, but to be honest, the Focus's power looks at the same displacement car, not very good, I remember only 94kw.

Focus, there is no doubt that the beautiful appearance is the most attractive, I have always liked it, and I have been considering it recently when I am ready to change cars, the advantages, the appearance is beautiful, and the safety is relatively the best in this price range (the displacement of the Focus is not among the top models in terms of safety compared to other cars in its same price range), the interior of the Focus has been greatly improved, it is very dynamic, the seats are comfortable, and there are separate air conditioning vents in the rear, which is very humane. The shock absorption of American cars has always been good and comfortable.

But the Focus's fuel consumption is certainly not as economical as the Horse 3, and in addition, you can take a look at the online forums, there is too much feedback about the quality problems of the Focus,,, so in the end I didn't choose it,,。

Many people Fox said, the car is noisy, there must be something wrong, but I said that I have driven the Vios (6 years), and many Japanese and Korean cars that my friends have driven for many years, almost nothing wrong, including small problems,,, my car has only been replaced with a high-mounted brake bulb within 6 years.

The assembly quality of Japanese cars is higher than that of European and American cars.

Focus is cost-effective, and the power is still strong in Focus. The Ma 3 is only 79kw and the Focus is 91kw.

I recommend Ford's Focus, which is stable and solid, has good handling, and has better overall performance!

The owner is from Hefei, and it is recommended to buy Chery A5. Easy to repair. Easy pick-up. It must be fuel-saving, and it can also be integrated with oil and gas.

I think the landlord has seen it a little simpler.

1. If you have already seen these two cars, then you probably have paid attention in your heart, but you just need to have personal persuasion, or prove that your idea is right. Hehe, believe in your own subjective consciousness, otherwise it will be very awkward in the future.

2. I bought the hatchback Focus

I think it's good. The interior space is good, which is enough for an Asian body shape. You're not going to move with a car, are you going to crash into a wheel?

3. Basically, you can rest assured that from my personal feelings, the engine and transmission system of Japanese cars are designed for economy and comfort, and the power is incomparable with the German and American systems. As far as focus itself is concerned,Titongqin's sense of speed is very good,The control is relatively stable,The power is not very strong,I like a little feel,Otherwise, a finger pulls back and forth,It's like a toy。 =

4. It's no problem to run 160, provided that you have to go through a better run-in. The best output of my car is about about one rpm or so, and theoretically 120-140 should be the most suitable speed. I also went on the 160 highway, but it was a little trembling.

5. Fuel consumption is OK, about 9 per 100 kilometers in actual use, which has a lot to do with road conditions and driving methods.

6. Warranty and maintenance are the focus. The cost and convenience of maintenance and repair (in Beijing) are ...... than the top 6 of the Focus

7. Focus is not without harm: the sound insulation is not good, especially the tire noise. Make a little soundproofing, hehe.

Both orange cars are good cars in this B0 class.

It mostly depends on personal preference.

There are several things that Japanese cars have in common with European and American cars:

1.The material is good for European and American cars.

2.Fuel-efficient Japanese cars are good.

3.Japanese cars in the Chinese market, hey, not paying attention to it can be said to be discriminatory, originally a good car as soon as it arrived in China, the core technology to the circle chain off.

4.The chassis of European and American cars is solid after Japanese cars, and after five years of driving, you will know that the steel of the car is poor.

I've driven both of these cars, and to be honest, they're both good.

The Mazda6 has a younger appearance than the Focus.

The comparison of both cars is obviously underpowered.

To be honest, there is no need to compare, the more you compare, the more you don't know which one to choose.

The horsepower is very cost-effective, and it is very advantageous during the replacement of the family fluid.

It doesn't make sense to compare B with C.

If you want me, I'll buy Ma Liu.

Of course, it is Ma Nian Lun Zida 6

6mt good. Power, fuel consumption, space call Gao Qin, handling is definitely M6 to be and Bibi Focus excellent.

There shouldn't be much to check the warranty.