Which is better, Focus or Mazda3

Current comparison model Mazda3

Classic AT Deluxe 2010 Focus.

Sedan AT luxury 2011 basic parameters guidance** (10,000 yuan): Car name: classic AT luxury 2010 sedan AT luxury 2011 brand:

Changan Mazda Changan Ford Car series: Mazda3 Focus Year model: 2010-06-2010-06-22 Production status:

In production in the production of the place of origin: domestic domestic length width height (mm): 4515 * 1745 * 14654480 * 1840 * 1500 wheelbase (mm):

26402640 Max Power (kW rpm): 110 6500104 6000 Max Torque (N 6 1m rpm): 182 4500180 4000 Transmission:

4-speed AT4-speed manual automatic gear number of gears: 44 Maximum speed (km h): 187185 fuel:

Gasoline Gasoline Comprehensive Fuel Consumption (L): Body Parameters Curb Weight (kg): 13101370 Number of Seats (pcs):

55 Trunk volume (L): 300526 Number of doors (pcs): 44 Front track (mm):

15301535 Rear track (mm): 15151531 approach angle (°) Departure angle (°) Minimum ground clearance (mm): 121-- Engine parameters Displacement (cc):

Pressurization mode: naturally aspirated Compression ratio: cylinder arrangement:

ll Number of cylinders: 44 Number of valves per cylinder (pcs): 44 Camshaft form:

DOHC DOHC Engine manufacturer Model: LFX S-VT variable valve timing control system; TSCV variable eddy current control system; VIS Variable Intake Manifold System CAF483Q0 Duratec-He DOHC 16V PVC Constant Length Intake Manifold VIS Variable Intake System Single-cylinder independent sequential ignition system Engine-specific technology: S-VT variable valve timing control system; TSCV variable eddy current control system; VIS Variable Intake Manifold System Duratec-He DOHC 16V Plastic Steel Equal Length Intake Manifold VIS Variable Intake System Single Cylinder Independent Sequential Ignition System Cylinder Block Material:

Aluminum-aluminum Cylinder head material: aluminum-aluminum Chassis parameters Front suspension form: MacPherson independent suspension MacPherson (including front subframe + front anti-roll bar) Rear suspension form:

Multi-link independent suspension fully independent suspension system (including rear subframe + rear anti-roll bar) Front brake type: ventilated disc Rear brake type: disc disc Drive mode:

Front-wheel drive front-wheel drive Spare tire specifications: full-size full-size.

The Focus is good, the space is large, the power is great, and the ** is cheap.

For these two cars, I personally recommend that you choose Mazda three cars, which are more cost-effective, have higher market recognition, and have better value retention.

Mazda 3 vs. Focus.

In terms of appearance: the new Mazda 3, of course, has a slightly better design than the new Focus (which is already a street car).

In terms of workmanship: Chang'an workmanship has always had a poor reputation, and although the interior of the new Focus is more technological than the previous generation, the details are indeed unsatisfactory. Xinma 3 has not yet been put on the market domestically, but judging from the renderings, it should not be bad, at least not worse than Xinfu.

In terms of weight: the development direction of the automotive industry is to lightweight, which I hope the landlord understands. No manufacturer in the world will blindly add weight to the car, which is a very stupid behavior. As for the car floating, it is not only a matter of the weight of the car, but also involves professional aspects such as the chassis.

The new Ma3 also has SKYACTIV technology, which is the highlight. The Xinfu gearbox is a dual-clutch transmission, which theoretically shifts faster.

The advice to you is to wait and see for a while. The new Malaysia 3 listing is definitely a strong opponent, you can go to the 4S store to actually experience the test drive, if you are not satisfied, the new fortune in the new Malaysia 3 listing may have a certain range of preferential policies, so no matter what, waiting is the best way for now.

Mazda3 and the new Focus.

The first appearance of these two models The hatchback is better than its own sedan, and among their models, the hatchback has a very avant-garde exterior assembly line design, which is dynamic and sporty; Their sedans are similar, with the Ma3 rounded and the Focus angular points.

The second fuel consumption may be slightly higher than the Focus, which is also the view that Japanese cars are fuel-efficient American cars consume fuel, in fact, the key to fuel consumption is driving habits.

Third, the safety of American cars fuel consumption is that the body is relatively heavier than the Japanese car, and the body stability and safety have been improved, especially in terms of some materials, Japanese cars have more plastic parts.

Fourth, the handling Both cars are quite sporty and feel good to drive.

Of course, there are many aspects of comparison, depending on your hobbies, both are good, and I personally choose to choose Fox.