Is Huawei compromising its company by paying Qualcomm 1.8 billion in patent fees?

Not a compromise. Huawei paid Qualcomm 1.8 billion in patent fees because Huawei sold more products containing Qualcomm's patents than Qualcomm sold products containing Huawei's patents, which is a normal business transaction and is mutually beneficial. The proportion of patents is professionally calculated.

And because Huawei and Qualcomm have a large number of patent cross-licensing, Huawei pays much less royalties than Apple. The delay in reaching a settlement until now should be that Qualcomm finally made concessions on some aspects of patent licensing.

I don't think it's a compromise, because compromise means admitting defeat and giving in, and Hua's choice to pay royalties for this time is actually a normal business transaction and is mutually beneficial.

As the world's largest mobile phone manufacturer and mobile phone chip manufacturer, Huawei and Qualcomm are both partners and competitors. In the two camps of the science and technology industry, Qualcomm and its country are the old science and technology overlords, leading the communication industry, electronic components industry and other fields for many years, with strong technical precipitation and advanced technological innovation. Qualcomm's technological dominance in the field of communications has continued from 2G, 3G, and 4G to the present, although Huawei has achieved the world's leading position in 5G, it does not mean that Qualcomm has no revenue in 5G.

On the contrary, Qualcomm's share of 5G patents is more than Huawei's total 5G patents, which is why Qualcomm has a reason to ask Huawei for patent fees. <>

Can we see that Huawei is compromised? In fact, first of all, this is a normal international business cooperation, Huawei and Qualcomm are committed to the research and development of communication technology, and continue to improve in the competition. The crossover of technology will accelerate the speed of research and development between the two sides, reduce the cost of research and development, and improve the performance of products, which are mutually beneficial technical cooperation.

At the time of the promulgation of the ban on Huawei, Qualcomm's business was greatly affected, the world's largest communication equipment manufacturer and mobile phone manufacturer, Huawei's demand for chips is huge, in addition to the self-developed Kirin chips, Huawei still needs to order large quantities of chips from Qualcomm every year, it can be said that a large part of Qualcomm's profits are ** Huawei. Because Qualcomm's main business is not directly oriented to the consumer side of the market, it mainly generates revenue through patent fees and components, which has formed a relationship with Huawei in the upstream and downstream of the industrial chain. <>

So Huawei is not a compromise. First of all, Qualcomm did not ask Huawei to compromise, but actively promoted the cooperation between the two companies; Second, Huawei has not shown a compromise attitude, self-developed chips are still continuing, and competition with Qualcomm's technology field still exists; Third, the payment of patent fees will make Huawei and Qualcomm both gain a lot of benefits, and on the contrary, they will be damaged. <>

It seems that the dispute between Huawei and Qualcomm is also temporarily over, and it is also wise for Huawei to pay patent fees to Qualcomm this time, after all, we cannot deny that Qualcomm is still very good in high-end chips and other technologies, why can't Huawei take advantage of it?

Paying the fee does not represent a compromise between Huawei and Qualcomm. It may just be a normal expense, a patent expense, and it doesn't mean a compromise.

This is not a compromise, this is just a win-win cooperation, and Qualcomm has also got the benefits of Huawei.

Huawei is a company that pays special attention to R&D, and Huawei can also invest more money to train more R&D talents, which can make the company's competitiveness stronger and stronger, and Huawei can also make the company's patented products more and more.

Huawei's R&D expenses are actually relatively high, and Huawei's R&D expenses can also account for a large proportion, many people pay special attention to Huawei's products, and they are also looking forward to Huawei's products. Huawei's R&D expenditure reached 141.8 billion, is Huawei the enterprise with the most invention patents in China? Huawei is indeed the enterprise with the most invention patents in China, and there are three reasons why it is:

1. Huawei has the highest R&D expenditure.

The reason why Huawei has become the enterprise with the most invention patents in China is that Huawei can invest the highest R&D expenses, Huawei attaches great importance to product research and development, and can also pay more attention to the patent field, which can make Huawei's patent rights better protected. By developing more new products, Huawei will be able to become more and more competitive. <>

The reason why Huawei has so many invention patents is also because Huawei can hire more R&D talents, and Huawei can hire more talents through high salaries, and it can also attract more talents to the company, which means that Huawei can continuously improve its innovation capabilities and improve the creativity of its employees. <>

3. Huawei can apply for a patent product.

Huawei's patented products are indeed the largest number of domestic enterprises, because Huawei can continue to apply for more patented products, and Huawei attaches great importance to protecting its intellectual property rights, especially patent rights, so whenever Huawei can develop more new products, Huawei can immediately apply for patent rights, and can also obtain legal protection by applying for patents. <>

Therefore, Huawei is indeed the enterprise with the most invention patents in China.

Huawei is now the company with the most invention patents in China, three times higher than Haier. R&D investment is mainly concentrated in mobile phone R&D, chip design, HUAWEI CLOUD system, car manufacturing and other fields.

I think this is indeed the case, Huawei is indeed the enterprise with the most invention patents in China, and Huawei's technology is very powerful.

Yes, Huawei's patents are all valid and can promote Huawei's development, and now Huawei's position in the market is very high.

The question itself is fake news!

First of all, the United States asked Canada to detain Huawei Meng, not for technology, but to suppress Huawei, in order to maintain the United States' technological leadership and market occupation. Because Huawei has become the world's largest communications equipment manufacturer, and 5G technology has begun to surpass American companies, this will further compress the living space of American companies, which is not conducive to the United States' right to speak in this industry.

At the same time, suppressing Huawei is also a part of dealing with China, and it is currently waging a first-class war against China.

Another purpose is that the United States has been hyping up security threats, and the security threat of Huawei's products to implement global monitoring of the United States is real, because Huawei does not cooperate with the United States to reserve a backdoor on communication equipment for surveillance, so it has become a security threat!

Beware that communication equipment that is too secure is a security threat to the Five Eyes alliance in the United States.

The United States refuses to compensate Huawei for 5G patent fees? The consequences may be unbearable, the United States: I didn't say no!

Sue! There's nothing else you can do about it!

Huawei currently has about 5 million chips in stock, and Huawei's biggest supporter is SMIC in addition to MediaTek. Before the policy of suppressing Huawei in country M has not changed, Huawei can only offset the huge losses suffered by Huawei by making a move on 5G patents.

In the case that Huawei has 5G core patents, it is absolutely abnormal if it is still passively beaten. Huawei's current state is already like this, and if it is bad, it can be as bad as **. How far can the United States suppress the Ming Nuclear Agitation if it suppresses it, so it must take action when it is time to take action!

The thinking of Chinese is to like to be kind to others, like peaceful coexistence and win-win cooperation. In the face of the United States' no bottom line, Huawei's Ren Zhengfei finally made a move. Qualcomm, Apple and Samsung are finally going to pay 5G patent fees to Huawei, and Huawei's target has already been locked on Apple and Samsung.

Huawei's Ren Zhengfei also said that the 5G patent fee charged by Huawei is very reasonable. In the face of such a kind-hearted Huawei, what action will M Guo, who has always liked sheep shearing, make? We'll see!

March 16, 2021 is a turning point in Huawei's history, no matter how Apple or Samsung sit on pins and needles, we can't run away from paying patent fees, and Apple has actually fallen to the altar of limbs without 5G patents!

In the first half of the year, the most exciting news in the mobile phone market is that Huawei's HiSilicon Kirin is about to become a swan song. Due to the restrictions imposed by the United States, HiSilicon Kirin could not find a suitable OEM factory in the world. Even if Huawei has mastered the ability to design advanced chips, it doesn't make much sense when no one produces it.

At that time, many people believed that after the loss of HiSilicon Kirin, Huawei's share of the domestic mobile phone market would be hit hard.

After this news came out, industry professionals believed that Huawei had done a good job of cooperation with Qualcomm. If Qualcomm's Snapdragon chips can be used, Huawei's share of the domestic mobile phone market will not change much. However, it has recently been reported that Huawei has suspended the payment of retroactive patent payments to Qualcomm because Qualcomm has not resumed its supply to Huawei.

In fact, when Huawei was ready to pay the supplement, Qualcomm had already submitted a relevant application to the US authorities. In addition to the socks, Intel and many other tech giants have also proposed permission to resume supplying to Huawei. But so far, the authorities have not made any statement on the applications of these companies.

In the case that Qualcomm has no way to supply Huawei, the so-called patent fee may not have any meaning, and Huawei will naturally not continue to pay this fee to Qualcomm.

For the current Huawei, since HiSilicon Kirin has no choice, then only by cooperating with Qualcomm can it maintain the share of Huawei mobile phones in the domestic market. The biggest difference between Huawei and Xiaomi, OPPO and Vivo is that Huawei phones are very popular in the high-end market. In addition to recognizing HiSilicon Kirin, the remaining two are Apple A series and Qualcomm Snapdragon.

Although MediaTek has worked very hard this year, it still can't change consumers' impression of low-end chips. To some extent, Qualcomm is Huawei's best choice right now, unless Huawei chooses to withdraw from the mobile phone market entirely. In the face of pressure from many parties, the possibility of Qualcomm obtaining permission from the authorities is still very high.

Recently, 5G has become a key focus in the field of communications, and related technology companies are in full swing in the field of 5G. Unfortunately, in the 5G era, China's Huawei has also tried its best, and the 5G standard is not a vote, and the encoding scheme of the future data channel will use Qualcomm LFPC technology.

It is a foregone conclusion that American companies will dominate 5G technical standards, which means that all mobile phones that support 5G networks in the future will need to be reviewed and approved by Qualcomm and paid. At the same time, Qualcomm also announced the license rate for 5G patent authorization, and devices that fully meet the requirements of 3GPP Release 15 must pay patent fees.

Qualcomm's fees for the use of 5G patents are as follows: the patent usage rates for single-mode 5G mobile phones are; Multi-mode (3G, 4G, 5G) mobile phone royalty rates. That is to say, for every mobile phone sold, a patent fee will be paid to Qualcomm.

In China, it is basically based on multi-mode mobile phones, and a single mobile phone is paid for every 1,000 yuan. In 2017, Huawei, OPPO, vivo, and Xiaomi shipped 100 million 4G mobile phones on behalf of China, and it is estimated that domestic manufacturers may have to pay Qualcomm patent fees of up to 30 billion yuan per year at an average price of 2,000 yuan.

I think it's good to charge royalties, after all, it is made by Huawei's own industrial chain.

Recently, the technical issue of whether Huawei can collect patent fees from Verizon Telecom has been hyped up as a "political issue" by some politicians in the United States, and Rubio, a well-known anti-China congressman in the United States who has been attacking China for "intellectual property theft" from the United States in the past, even jumped out to accuse Huawei of charging patent fees from American companies as "patent trolls".

However, the label of "patent troll" cannot be put on Huawei's head at all. In fact, as for patent fees, this does not depend entirely on Huawei's subjective willingness to collect it, but more on the actual practice of American companies, that is, whether they use Huawei's patents, whether their use of Huawei's patents has been legally authorized, and whether they have paid the corresponding fees.

It is not difficult to figure out these issues, but if American companies use Huawei's patented technology without permission and without paying for it, then it is not Huawei that is really "playing hooligans", but American telecommunications companies.

I think it is very legitimate for Huawei to collect patent fees from American companies, in the past we paid too many patent fees to the United States, and now Chinese companies can collect patent fees from American companies, and there is an inexplicable sense of pride, and this incident also shows that Huawei's technology has really begun to lead in the world.

On June 13, it was reported that Huawei wants to collect patent fees from U.S. operators, and the fees to be paid are more than $1 billion. In the past, due to technological restrictions, we paid patent fees to others, but now with the rise of technology, Chinese companies will also charge fees for licensing patent use, which may seem unbelievable at first glance, but it does happen.

In the past, relying on technological advantages, we could not get good products, but suffered from their sky-high prices. Now that technology is rising, I feel that our Chinese technology has stood up in the world and can no longer be so passive.