I don t know what you think of the sentence If the son does not teach, the father is guilty ?

If the son does not teach, the father's fault" is very reasonable, because a child's growth process is inseparable from the words and deeds of his parents, and the words and deeds of his parents will directly affect the child's life. Children educated by parents with good quality and character will certainly not be wrong. Because they have been influenced by their parents' good education and words and deeds since they were young, their ideas and qualities are very good!

And there are many parents who themselves are people with low quality and poor character, and they do not do anything, ignore their children, let them grow up on their own. When a child grows up in such a family, with such parents and in such an environment, can he be mentally and spiritually healthy? As the saying goes:

Raising a son is like raising a pig if you don't teach it, that's the truth. On the one hand, children's growth is most influenced by their parents, and on the other hand, it is also a crucial factor related to their own environment. If the father is a person of noble character, then the child will definitely be different.

That father is originally crooked, what good children do you expect him to teach? As the old saying goes: dragons give birth to dragons, and phoenixes give birth to phoenixes.

Rats give birth to babies that make holes. This old saying is the best answer to the saying "If the son does not teach, the father is guilty".

For the Son not to teach, the Father is to blame"That's how it is understood. Whether a child can become a cultivated and moral person has absolutely nothing to do with his parents. Because whether a child can get a good family education from an early age depends entirely on his parents, and the long-term education and influence on him.

It is often said that parents are the best teachers of their children"I couldn't agree more. Parents' speech and behavior will affect children in daily life.

Because children who are immature in all aspects have no ability to distinguish between many things, and do not know what is good and what is bad; What is right and what is wrong. Only his parents are his role models, and he will follow his parents' example. Children who live in the company of their parents for a long time will be taught by their words and deeds.

In the subtle way, the child will become that kind of person. If the parents are kind, upright, generous, responsible, and responsible people. In daily life, I will educate my child in this way, and influence him through every bit of my life.

Let the child unknowingly, he will become a person like his parents. If the parents are bad people, morally corrupt, small-bellied, irresponsible, and irresponsible. They will educate and influence their children according to their own wishes.

Subtly, children will become people like their parents. The various cultivation of children by parents from an early age will affect all aspects of their children in a silent and long-term way. Even the child's future, and the future of destiny.

It plays an important role in shaping your child's personality and temperament.

I think this should be a manifestation of family education, parents are the first teachers of their children, and they are also the most important role models, and children are generally like like parents. For children to make mistakes, generally speaking, parents can often find a variety of reasons, this sentence is also the ancients after years of summary, the wisdom of many people to summarize a sentence, there is a certain profound meaning in it. For children, many times they are learning from their parents, and their parents' words and deeds, parents' thoughts, and parents' actions will affect their children all the time.

The problem of parents' education of their children is a very big problem, but now many families are infinitely doting on their children, parents will help their children do anything for him, even if the child can do a good job, and parents will not let him do it, for this infinite doting is a very wrong performance, it is in this kind of doting situation, now there are a lot of gnawing old people in society, they dare not face up to difficulties, dare not grow up, more than thirty, still live at home by their parents, This is a very correct manifestation that the Son does not teach the Father. Even if he can't do it himself, he should try to understand the difficulties and understand the hardships, so as to be able to establish a correct outlook on life, values, and the world. The influence of a father on a child is very huge, a father who is upright and upright generally does not raise a timid and atrophied child, so it is also difficult for a father who is also timid, cowardly, and cautious to raise a child with such a character, very brave and very strong.

This sentence is very reasonable, it shows the importance of family education, not simply the fault of the father, but now children are exposed to too many things, family education, school education, and social education are all responsible, but family education is still the most important.

The child is an angel from heaven, and he is pure and unblemished. But just because he is pure white, what you write on it will become. Children's education has been a university question since ancient times, how to educate their children well, how to let children know more truths, these are the education of parents.

Parents are the first life coaches of their children, and they are also very important mentors, and the type of personality of the child depends entirely on the educational influence of the parents, especially the father. 'The son does not teach, the father is wrong' means that the child does not educate well, which is the responsibility of the father and mother. Oh, yes!

Think about those children crying and making fuss in public outside, and passers-by have no choice but to remind adults, but in turn, adults don't care, and say, 'He's just a child, why are you angry with children!' Oh, yes! He's just a kid!

However, the elders next to him are not children! But you connive at your children to do wrong things, completely unaware of the terrible things that are true, and if children are not sensible, are adults also ignorant. The child will not realize his mistakes, he will only think that the adults did not say anything about him, and that what he did was right.

He will do this often in the future!

If the son does not teach, the fault of the father" comes from the phrase "if you don't teach, the father is wrong", I think this sentence is very reasonable. Although, a person's education is mainly divided into: family education, school education, and social education.

Family education is naturally the earliest education that a person receives, which is considered enlightenment education, and the most important thing for educators is naturally parents, and parents play different roles in the education of children, so they are indispensable. Many people may think that since they are indispensable, why do they still say that "the son does not teach, the father is wrong", does not ignore the role of the mother's education? In family education, mother's education is more emotional, while father's education is more rational. Sensibility is important, but so is reason.

However, in many families nowadays, the father earns money to support the family, and the mother is responsible for educating the children, which is very unscientific. Children who are completely taken care of by their mothers are more than emotional but not rational enough, and are prone to weakness, hesitation, and indecisiveness; Moreover, the father rarely participates in family education, resulting in the lack of his role, forming this kind of "widowed" family, which is also easy to make the mother psychologically unbalanced and even anxious and irritable, and in the end it is the child who is angry, which is undoubtedly what no one wants to see.

There are many children, girls are better, if the education is good, they will be very sensible, very well-behaved, very obedient, but boys are relatively more strict in discipline, after all, this society is too impetuous, if the discipline is not improper, boys are easy to make mistakes. In society, it is common to see some boys fighting and brawling, thinking that this is all related to the boy's parents not disciplining their children harshly, which leads to such an outcome and consequences. In short, for the sentence "the son does not teach, the father's fault" is worth pondering as a parent of every child, if you want to educate children with good conduct, you must discipline them strictly from an early age, otherwise there will be unimaginable consequences, and parents will regret it when the time comes.

The father's tutoring plays a huge role in the development of the child's intelligence, exercise, tempering the will, etc., so that the child grows up with a sense of security and superiority, "strict teacher out of high apprentices", "strict father out of filial piety", the father teaches the boy with the masculinity that a man should have, which is far from being achieved by the mother's education, the child always accepts the mother's education and lacks the father's participation, it is easy to produce dependence, and the ability to be independent is relatively poor.

The meaning of the son not teaching the father: it is the fault of the parents who only provide food and clothing for their children and do not educate them well. It's just education, but not being strict is the laziness of being a teacher.

Source: "Three Character Classic" [Author] Wang Yinglin [Dynasty] Song Dynasty "The son does not teach, the father's fault" This sentence is a revision of the "Three Character Classic", the original text is:

If you don't teach, it's your father's fault. If the teaching is not strict, the teacher is lazy.

It is not the fault of the children who do not teach their parents. Nor is it the fault of the father for not educating his children.

The original text means:

It is the fault of the father (parents) that he did not send his children to school (in ancient times, it was a private school).

Not sending them to school and not educating their children are two different things.

That is to say, it is the responsibility of parents for children to make mistakes, and there are parents all over the world? Wrong! There are no children in the world!

When a child is born with a blank piece of paper, who is teaching? Who's taking it? Who's leading by example?

Who's in charge? That's all parents! Everything is taught by your parents!

Even if it is superstitious, it is the fault of the parents that it is the fault of the parents, and there is such retribution!

It is the father's fault that he has a child without education.

It is the fault of the parents to teach their children.

It is the fault of the parents that their children do not teach.

This is what children mean by not teaching their parents' mistakes, which is meant to indicate that children should discipline their parents well.

The son does not teach the fault of the father This sentence should be the fault of the father who does not teach it. It means that it is the fault of parents who only provide food and clothing for their children and do not educate them well. It comes from the traditional Chinese enlightenment textbook "Three Character Classic".

Among the ancient Chinese classics, the "Three Character Classic" is one of the most simple and easy to read books.

1 The meaning of the son not to teach the father.

The true meaning of the son not teaching the father is that it is the father's fault that he has raised a child and does not educate it. From Song Wang Yinglin's "Three Character Classic" does not teach, the father's teaching, the teaching is not strict, and the teacher is lazy.

It is very undesirable for children to refuse to study hard. If a person does not study hard when he is a child, and when he is old, he does not understand the principles of being a human being and has no knowledge, what can he do?

Excerpt from the original text of the Son Not the Father's Fault:

If you don't teach, it's your father's fault. If the teaching is not strict, the teacher is lazy. If you don't learn, it's not appropriate. If the young don't learn, what is the annihilation of the old.

If the jade is not cut, it will not be made. People do not learn, they do not know righteousness. As a son of man, when Fang was young. Relatives and friends, practice etiquette.

Translation of the original text of the Son not the Father's fault:

If the son does not teach the father, it is the fault of the father. It's just education, but not being strict is the laziness of being a teacher. It is very undesirable for children to refuse to study hard.

If a person does not study hard when he is a child, and when he is old, he does not understand the principles of being a human being and has no knowledge, what can he do?

The son does not teach the father's fault, just like jade does not become a fine utensil if it is not carved. And if people don't know how to learn and realize their own value with their own knowledge and skills, they don't know etiquette and can't become talents. Children from childhood.

Get close to your teachers and friends, and learn a lot of etiquette and knowledge from them.

2 Educational revelations that the son does not teach the father

The son in "the son does not teach the father" refers to the child's family, the child, the father, refers to the parents and even the elders, including the grandparents, my grandparents and other guardians, which means that the child is not taught well, it is the fault of the elders of the family, not the fault of the father alone. There is some truth to it, but it is a bit narrow-minded.

The child croaks and falls to the ground from the mother's body, and it is all innocent, just like a blank piece of paper, whatever is painted, it is what it is. If he paints the latest and most beautiful patterns on it, he will be beautiful when he grows up, and if he carelessly scribbles on it, he will grow up to be bad. Why is there such a big difference, the key is education.

The ancients told us a long time ago that the son did not teach the father, "If you don't teach, the father is wrong." If the teaching is not strict, the teacher is lazy. In other words, education is not the responsibility of unilateral parents, nor is it the responsibility of unilateral teachers, but the responsibility of both parties.

The fact that the son does not teach the father tells us that parents should be primarily responsible for the education of their children. In fact, to a large extent, fathers have far less influence on their children than mothers have on their children. After all, in traditional culture, the father is outside the main and the mother is inside the home.

No one is born to understand everything, and to learn from whoever he follows. Parents have children and spend the most time with their children, so they learn the most from their parents. If the parent's education is lacking, or the education is not appropriate, the impact on the child is immeasurable.