Einstein s theory of relativity is always mentioned, so why is Mills s theory so little known?

Mills's theory does not have enough practical value to make any relevant answers, let's talk about Einstein's theory of relativity first, Einstein's theory of relativity is always mentioned because it has made outstanding contributions to the development of physics and has greatly promoted it, and black holes are the best representative.

On April 10, Eastern Time, the internationally renowned organization Horizon Telescope announced the release of the first black hole in Washington, D.C., Brussels, Belgium, and other parts of the world. This ** is very hard-won, it took a lot of manpower, material and financial resources, the discovery of this achievement not only caused a lot of sensation in the astronomical community, but the whole world is cheering for the production of this achievement. This black hole is not only a **, but also represents the proof of mankind's exploration and discovery of the unknown universe, and it also means that Einstein, a scientist close to God, has once again successfully predicted the fact that black holes were discovered by humans.

Under further explanation, what is a black hole, the reason why a black hole is called a black hole, mainly because the gravitational pull of the black hole is extremely huge, and any object and matter that wants to get close to or close to it will be absorbed into it, and even light cannot escape his "clutches", so people are used to calling him a "black hole".

What is Mills' Theory? In fact, the full name is the Yang-Mills theory, in fact, this theory is only one of the countless unified theories, and the most important thing is that it is only proposed, and does not make a substantive answer, and does not have any value.

On the other hand, those masters of physics and their theories that were later talked about, such as Einstein and his theory of relativity, Newton and gravitation, Maxwell and his equations, etc., all played a role in promoting the development of physics. It is not difficult to explain that Mills's theory is not famous, and even dwarfs it compared to other theories.

Why did Einstein come up with the theory of relativity, but no one else discovered it? The results of Michelson-Morley's experiments can be explained by the knowledge learned in junior high school (light is a wave, the wave propagates in a medium of the same state, and the propagation speed of the wave is constant with it as a medium of propagation in the frame of reference), there is no need to assume the scale effect, there is no need to assume that the speed of light is constant, these assumptions are icing on the cake, and the theory of relativity is a fallacy with no original basis. The goal of science is not high, and science should be realistic, not fandom.

When the propagation medium is used as the frame of reference, the propagation velocity of the wave in the homomorphic medium is constant.

To prove that light does not need a medium, the speed at which light waves travel in the Earth's atmospheric medium is illogical and only a madman would have imagined. If you test the speed of light on the Earth and get Einstein's theory of relativity, then you test the speed of sound on the Earth and get the theory of relativity? Michelson Morley's experiments measured that the speed of light on Earth is constant, but only the propagation properties of waves:

Waves propagate in a medium of the same state, with its propagation medium as the frame of reference, and the propagation speed is constant. There is no scale effect, there is no basis for relativity. When a wave propagates in a medium in the same state, the speed of the wave does not change when the medium is used as a frame of reference.

The speed of any wave tested on Earth is constant, and the Michelson-Murray experiment tests that the speed of light is constant on Earth, which only proves that light is a wave, but not Einstein's theory of relativity. It cannot prove that the speed of light is equal to the speed of any frame of reference, nor can it be used as a basis for the theory of relativity. The speed of any wave is constant, not just the speed of light.

When a wave takes its propagation medium as a frame of reference, its propagation speed is not affected by the speed of motion of its propagation medium, which is a characteristic of the wave. It is illogical to use the propagation characteristics of light in a medium to prove that the propagation of light does not require a medium. It cannot be proven that the speed of light does not change when it is mentioned to other objects.

The theory of relativity is a fallacy. It is a mystery that waves propagate in a medium of the same state, and when the medium is referenced, the waves travel at the same speed. This is the basic property of waves, and I talked about it in junior high school physics, didn't Einstein learn junior high school physics?

Or deliberately misleading science! The manuscript was burned, and even the tombstone did not dare to remain, it should have been deliberate! "。

Therefore, Michelson believes that this result shows that ether moves with the earth. Some popular science articles deliberately distort the facts to mislead readers into believing that the Michelson-Murray experiment is denied"Ether"exists. These kinds of articles spread superstition rather than science.

Because Einstein was great.

There are many reasons for this, one of the main reasons being that learning the Young-Mills theory requires a high starting point, which makes it unsuitable for popular science among the general public.

First, the mathematical basis is different

The basic knowledge of relativity and quantum mechanics can be understood and mastered by those who have studied calculus, and when it is necessary to study in depth, it involves deeper mathematical skills and knowledge.

However, from the very beginning, the Yang-Mills theory requires a high mathematical foundation and physical theoretical foundation, including group theory, non-Euclidean geometry, linear algebra, advanced calculus, color-dynamic quantum mechanics and general relativity, etc., which is difficult to explain clearly in popular language, so it is not suitable for popular science among the public.

Take the "Yang-Mills equation", the core of the theory, for example, it is a book of heaven for most people!

Modern science has been very finely divided, and most of the cutting-edge theories involve difficult mathematical knowledge; Books related to modern science can be divided into two types, one is a headache after reading a page, and the other is a headache after reading a line, and the Yang-Mills theory belongs to the first type.

Second, the interest of the theory itself is different

Many inferences of relativity and quantum mechanics are contrary to our common sense, such as the time contraction effect, the black hole theory, Schrödinger's cat (superposition), quantum entanglement, quantum tunneling effect, and so on.

These phenomena can greatly arouse the interest of the public, so that the public is willing to learn about these interesting knowledge, so many science popularization workers are also willing to spend time on the popularization of relativity and quantum mechanics.

However, the Yang-Mills theory pays more attention to mathematical explanations, and it is difficult for any point of view to attract the attention of the public, so although the Yang-Mills theory is very famous in the physics community, it is far less well-known than the theory of relativity and quantum mechanics among the public.

3. Gold medal effect

The Yang-Mills theory is very important in theoretical physics (it unifies electromagnetic and weak forces), but it is not as good as general relativity, special relativity, and quantum mechanics (Note: the Yang-Mills theory is related to quantum mechanics). It's like we know that the 110m hurdles champion at the 2004 Athens Olympics is Liu Xiang, but we don't know who the runner-up and third place are.

The focus of the public is always focused on the "first", which is called the gold medal effect.

The Young-Mills theory is untenable.

I think it's because Einstein is more concerned than Yang Zhenning

Because Yang Zhenning's theory has not been applied to the field of technology.

I think it's probably because Einstein has a high status in people's hearts.

It may be that Einstein's contribution is relatively large, so this is why it is like this.

This is still to be judged according to each person's subjective consciousness, and the points of attention are different.

It may be that everyone's understanding is different, and some people's subjectivity is also different.

Maybe he hasn't been discovered yet, that's why it's like this.

Personally, I think that everyone's focus is still different.

Personally, I think it's because people's attention is not on this yet.

1 Solar cells, burglar alarms, and light meters for cameras are all based on the photoelectric effect.

2 Nuclear energy makes use of the physical phenomenon that when uranium atoms are fissioned, a small loss of total mass can be converted into energy, based on Einstein's famous equation e mc2Today, nuclear energy provides 25 percent of the UK's electricity.

3 The Global Positioning System (GPS) is able to accurately position objects down to the meter because of the correction of signals emitted by Earth satellites based on Einstein's theory of relativity.

4 Special relativity, combined with quantum theory, points to the existence of antimatter. Scientists use positrons, or antimatter "electrons," to study brain activity through X-ray tomography.

5 The properties of subatomic particles are a direct result of the theory of relativity, and their existence can explain a variety of phenomena ranging from the properties of chemical elements to the action of magnets.

6 Einstein's research on photons in 1916-1917 laid the groundwork for the discovery of lasers 40 years later. At present, lasers are widely used in a variety of products from *** to laser printers.