Wu Song fights the tiger, Wu Song is not a hero

Calculate. Because the tiger he hit often hurts people.

Not counted. In fact, fighting tigers is self-preservation. Later, innocent people were killed indiscriminately, and blood was splashed on the Mandarin Duck Tower.

He is self-preservation, and he has never thought about eliminating harm for the people!

Wu Song fights the tiger, of course, he is a hero. Because at that time, there were a lot of tigers, and they often came out to harm people's lives, which was very terrifying. Wu Song fights tigers to eliminate harm for the people and is a hero. What's more, there are a lot of tigers, so it doesn't matter if you kill one or two.

Be! This kind of question should be conditional.

His bravery, tenacity, and fearlessness in fighting tigers are commendable, both in the past and in modern times.

As for his behavior of beating tigers, it was a chivalrous act at that time, eliminating harm for the people. But in modern times, tigers are no longer a pest, but an example of protecting animals. Not only can you not beat it, but you have to cherish it more than you cherish it - if you beat it, you have to sentence it.

This is called a different era and a different fate.

First of all, I have to admit that Wu Song defeated the ferocious tiger alone, which is beyond the reach of ordinary people, and besides, as far as the society at that time is concerned, Wu Song also eliminated harm for the people. So from this point of view, Wu Song is indeed a hero.

However, from the point of view of biological protection, he is not doing well, as a superior human being, or as a hero, he should also have a benevolent heart, not necessarily to kill the tiger, as long as it is driven away, isn't it?

This is a matter of personal understanding, depending on what you think.

If you think that Wu Song has eliminated harm for the people, then he is considered a hero.

If you think Wu Song has destroyed the ecological environment, then he is not a hero.

Not counted. Just drunk and beat a tiger.

No, this kind of behavior is a damage to the ecological environment.

After reading the story of Wu Song fighting the tiger in "Water Margin", Wang Ren put forward his own opinions. He believes that Wu Song does not care for wild animals when he fights tigers, so Wu Song cannot be called a hero.

I think Wu Song can be regarded as a hero when he fights tigers. Because at that time, there were many tigers in the Song Dynasty, and the tiger problem was very serious, and many people in the local area were eaten by tigers. Once Wu Song went out, he met a tiger, this tiger is man-eater, as soon as he saw Wu Song, he opened his bloody mouth and wanted to eat him, Wu Song out of self-defense, so he killed the tiger.

Wu Song eliminated harm for the people, and people happily carried the tiger through the streets, so Wu Song was also named the governor.

But tigers can't be fought now, because now wild tigers are endangered. According to scientists, there were about 100,000 wild tigers in the 20th century, but there are less than 5,000 at present. There are only about 50 tigers in China, and there are less than 10 South China tigers.

Protecting wildlife is everyone's responsibility, and the relationship between us humans and wildlife is inextricably linked. As we all know, there are fewer and fewer wild animals in China. Wild horses, high-nosed antelopes, elk and other 10 species of animals have been completely extinct.

More than a dozen species of wild animals, such as giant pandas, gibbon monkeys, tigers, wild elephants, and white-sided dolphins, are facing extinction! Due to the ignorance, greed, and ignorance of a small number of people, the killing of animals everywhere has caused the ecological imbalance of the earth, causing immeasurable losses!

In short, to sum up, I think Wu Song is a hero to fight the tiger, but he can't fight the tiger now, otherwise the tiger will be quickly extinct and will be punished by the law.

The title of "hero" has a strong character of the times, and it is not historical materialism to discuss right and wrong in isolation from the environment of the times.

Killing a cannibalistic tiger is a hero of "eliminating harm for the people", and this understanding lasted at least until the 60s of the 20th century.

Therefore, fighting the tiger Wu Song is an uncontroversial hero.

It was a hero in those days, because there were many tigers and they often ate people. Now, of course, no, you will be caught and fined.

This tiger has always loved to hurt people、、、 only limited to ** content, do not contact reality, dead drill horns).

Getting rid of it is a way to get rid of it for the people.

In other words, heroes.

In my personal opinion, Wu Song is not a hero for the following reasons: 1In modern civilized society, tigers, as state-level protected animals, should be relatively protected, and at this time, propaganda to fight tigers will pose a certain danger to the survival of tigers.

2.Wu Song didn't fight the tiger because he was a hero, he would also be afraid, the original text reads, "Fang Zhiduan has a tiger; I wanted to turn around and go back to the hotel, and thought: "When I go back, I have to eat him and laugh at him for not being a good man, so it is difficult to turn around."

He just didn't want to lose his life, so he fought with the tiger, not with the original intention of eliminating harm for the people. And he didn't listen to the advice of the store, he insisted on going his own way, and he deserved to meet the tiger.

Water Margin is written about a group of demons who kill people without blinking.

Walker Wu Song too, you can calculate, how many people he killed in total from his brother's death He fought tigers? Even if it's a hero, the story says that he accidentally bumped into it, and it's actually an exaggeration to beat the tiger in order to survive, you go to the zoo and take a look, wild tigers, do you think they can be killed with their bare hands?

For fictional and exaggerated characters, or a guy who kills people without blinking, do you think heroic??!

First, from the perspective of eliminating harm for the people, that is a hero.

Second, from the perspective of modern animal protection, that is not right.

Not a hero.

1 Animals are friends of human beings, and fighting tigers is equivalent to beating their own friends, which is not right.

2. Destroying the ecological balance.

3 In the story, Wu Song accidentally bumped into the tiger, he only wanted to defend himself, so he became a tiger, and "eliminating harm for others" was not his original intention.

4 He was reckless.

It can be because there were many tigers in Wu Song's era, and they can't be compared with now, and the tigers are rarely listed as key protected animals.

Of course, because tigers were extremely ferocious at that time. A rampant and domineering animal, he didn't know that he had eaten many people, so Wu Song was a hero.

1.A thing, under different conditions, in different time periods, has different meanings, and things cannot be viewed from a static point of view, things are development, and things should be viewed from the point of view of motion. That era was completely different from now, that is, people had no resistance, otherwise how could there be the idiom of talking about tiger changing color?

That's right, it's not humans who hurt tigers, it's tigers that hurt humans. More importantly, when people think of tigers, they avoid fear, and they don't care about protecting them. But Wu Song's martial arts are strong, and he is brave in the face of righteousness and righteousness, and he eliminates harm for the people.

Yes, because he is for the people.

In ancient times, it was definitely a big hero, and in modern times, it was definitely killing a state-protected animal....

When a tiger hurts someone, Wu Song is a hero.

In ancient times, Wu Song was a hero, but not now.

First, from the perspective of eliminating harm for the people, that is a hero.

Second, from the perspective of modern animal protection, that is not right.

He used to be a hero, but now he's a bear.