The old man gave all the family property to his granddaughter, does the son have the right not to pr

The old man gave all the family property to his granddaughter, does the son have the right not to provide for the elderly? The son has no right not to support the elderly, because the old man raised you when he was a child, in the law of the country, the old man is old, you should be filial to the old man, Lao Tzu life This is also a kind of national regulation.

It is a natural duty for a son to support his parents, and he must support him. There is no right not to provide for the elderly. It is not because the elderly give their property to anyone, they must provide for the elderly.

In fact, it is his own right to give the old man's property to whom, and it is the obligation of every child to support the elderly, regardless of whether he inherits the property or not.

There is no right, no matter whether the elderly give you property or not, the children have the obligation to support the elderly.

There is no right not to support the elderly.

It is a legal obligation for children to support the elderly, and this obligation does not change due to issues such as inheritance, distribution and distribution of property of the elderly.

No matter who the old man gives the family property to, the son has the obligation to support the elderly, and it is illegal not to provide for the elderly.

The old man gave all his family property to his granddaughter, and his son had no right not to support his old age.

No.. Children have a statutory obligation to support the elderly. Just because an old man can't get his inheritance doesn't mean he doesn't fulfill this obligation.

No, the old man must be supported, because that is the one who gave birth to you and raised you, and he has to support him without any property.

Supporting the elderly is everyone's obligation You can't not support the elderly for various reasons, our parents raised us young, no matter whether the old people have family property or who the family property is given to, but you have to support the elderly This is the principle of being a human being, and you think like this, pigs and dogs are not as good.

Supporting the elderly is a legal obligation and there is no reason not to do so.

Of course not, you have to support you

Legal analysis: Adult children have the obligation to support their parents, and both sons and daughters should fulfill the obligation to support the elderly, pay alimony, etc. If the daughter provides the main economic support or main support to the elderly, it shall be deemed that the main maintenance obligation has been fulfilled and the right to request more inheritance of the decedent's property.

Legal basis: Article 26 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China Parents have the obligation to raise, educate and protect their minor children. Adult children have an obligation to their parents to support, support and protect them.

Article 1127 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China The inheritance of inheritance shall be in the following order: (1) the first order: spouse, children, parents; (2) Second order:

Siblings, grandparents, maternal grandparents. After the inheritance begins, it is inherited by the first-order heirs, and the second-order heirs do not inherit; If there is no first-order heir, the second-order heir shall inherit. For the purposes of this Part, the term "children" includes legitimate children, children born out of wedlock, adopted children and dependent stepchildren.

For the purposes of this Part, the term "parents" includes biological parents, adoptive parents and step-parents in a dependent relationship. The term "siblings" as used in this Part includes siblings of the same parents, half-siblings or half-siblings, adoptive siblings, and step-siblings who have a dependent relationship. Article 16 of the Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on the Application of the Inheritance Part of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China (1) If the subrogated heir lacks the ability to work and has no livelihood, or has fulfilled the main obligation of support to the decedent, he may divide the inheritance more than he can.

Article 19 of the Interpretation (1) of the Supreme People's Court on the Application of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China on Inheritance Article 19 Where the decedent has been provided with the main economic support for his or her livelihood, or has given major assistance in terms of labor services, it shall be deemed that he has fulfilled the main obligation of support or the main obligation of support.

Summary. Then we chose to let the old man sign an agreement at a critical moment, that is, when the old man gave all the property to his son. Let the elderly sign an agreement, which clearly indicates that the elderly's future pension problems will be borne by the son, and the daughter does not need to bear any responsibility and financial compensation.

Most of the old people must claim that there is no problem, but if the son stands up and claims against it at this time, then it means that the son is definitely not a filial person. As a daughter, she can actually see more things clearly and keep her own rights and interests.

The old man's property was given to his son, and how to solve it by letting his daughter support the elderly.

Then we chose to let the old man sign an agreement at a critical moment, that is, when the old man gave all the property to his son. Let the elderly sign an agreement, which clearly indicates that the elderly's future pension problems will be borne by the son, and the daughter does not need to bear any responsibility and financial compensation. Most of the old people must claim that there is no problem, but if the son stands up and claims against it at this time, then it means that the son is definitely not a filial person.

For the sake of the daughter, you should reasonably support the elderly, but you still have to discuss some things with the old man's son, and the two parties can support them together, and you can't wrap all the responsibilities on yourself.

For the sake of the daughter, you should communicate with the old man about some things, the daughter supports a part, the son supports a part, and the daughter can't support all of them.

At this time, you can defend your rights through the law, because the children are originally the legal heirs, and it also shows that the old man's behavior is very good.

Sanction with the law. First of all, the Civil Code stipulates that children have an obligation to support their parents, regardless of whether the parents leave property to you, this obligation cannot be exempted. Parents who do not fulfill their maintenance obligations, lack the ability to work, or have difficulties in living have the right to demand alimony from their adult children.

In other words, the right of parents to dispose of property and the obligation of children to support their parents are not equivalent. There is no doubt that children have an obligation to support their parents, and if parents have more than one child, then each child should have an obligation to support them. Under normal circumstances, children bear the corresponding share according to the actual needs of their parents and their respective economic strength, but there is no shortage of such situations in life, children who are not by their parents' side contribute money, and children who are by their parents' side can also meet their parents' needs for life, medical treatment, and nursing, so the maintenance obligations borne by multiple supporters should be relatively equal.

According to the law, if the younger brother does not support his parents, the parents can sue the son for alimony and bear the responsibility for maintenance. However, due to the inconsistency of the subject of rights and the subject of obligations, generally speaking, the elder sister cannot directly sue the younger brother to fulfill the maintenance obligation, unless the parents entrust their daughter as the principal to sue the younger brother in their name to relieve their rights.

If you can't raise it, let your son raise it, and you can visit it regularly.

Persuade the old man's son to provide for the elderly, and the daughter should also provide for the old man as much as she can, because children have the obligation to support their parents!

With the continuous development of social economy, in real life, we will encounter a variety of situations, especially about if the parents are both their own property to her son, then the daughter still has the right of maintenance, in fact, we have to know that in this case, the daughter still has the right of maintenance, because according to the corresponding laws and regulations of our country there are clear obligations, so we must know.

First of all, we must understand such a problem, that is, the idea of preference for sons still exists in our lives, so many old people will leave all the family property in their names to their sons, and part of it to their daughters, and it is in this context that many daughters are psychologically unbalanced after they know, so they do not plan to support the elderly, but after the old man leaves the family property to his son, in fact, the daughter also has the right to support the snake. Because China's corresponding laws and regulations have clear provisions, that is, the scope of support obligors, including children and adult children with the ability to live, must fulfill the obligation of support.

Of course, in addition, according to the corresponding laws and regulations of our country, there are also clear requirements, that is, if the children do not fulfill their maintenance obligations, or the parents who are unable to work and have difficulties in life, when the children ask their children to give relevant alimony, the children must give a certain amount of alimony, only in this way can they better help their parents live, if the children refuse to give alimony to their parents, then the relevant problems can be solved through legal means, for children with bad circumstances, There will be criminal liability in accordance with the law, these things are very important, and they are very important, so each of us must be aware of them.

To sum up, we can obviously know that when we encounter this situation in real life, each of our children must know that daughters also have the right to support their parents, and they should treat their parents well.

Yes. Because children have the obligation and responsibility to support their parents, and it has nothing to do with the distribution of family property, daughters still have the right to support.

Of course, there is the right to support, because the old man is also his biological parent after all, so the daughter should be supported.

Yes, as the children of the parents, the daughter also has the right to support and can also support the parents.

The parents gave all their property to their grandchildren, and the daughter still has to support the elderly.

Hello, the parents gave all their property to their grandchildren, and their daughters have to provide for the elderly. The right of the parents to whom the property is given, no one has the right to interfere. Supporting her parents is the obligation of daughters.

According to the provisions, if the parents do not fulfill the obligation to support them, the minor children or the adult children who cannot live independently have the right to demand that the parents pay child support. Parents who fail to fulfill their obligation to support their adult children, who lack the ability to work, or who have difficulties in making a living, have the right to demand alimony from their adult children. Legal basis: Article 1067 of the Civil Code: If parents fail to perform their obligation to support them, minor children or adult children who cannot live independently have the right to demand that their parents pay child support.

Parents who fail to fulfill their obligation to support their adult children, or who lack the ability to work or who have difficulties in living, have the right to demand maintenance from their adult children.

The family property is given to the son, is the daughter obliged to provide for the elderly?

Good evening, dear, and it is a pleasure to serve you. In time, the family property was given to the son, and the daughter still has the obligation to provide for the elderly. Although the world stares at it, it sounds sad for his parents.

All the family property was given to his brother, and he didn't think about giving himself a penny. In this regard, what the parents did hurt their daughter's feelings really much. But this is not a reason for the daughter not to support her parents, she used her parents to give her back life, life is the most precious in the world, even if he does not give you the family property, you are still obliged to support the elderly.