How to review criminal law for the law exam? Who is good at law and criminal law

The institution has eight technical teachers: Bai Langtao, Zuo Ning, Ma Feng, Xuan Pengen, Li Jia, Meng Xiangui, Dai Peng, Lu Huan, etc., are very good. [Click here to learn more about the law exam].

Zhonghe has a rich business system, as follows:

1. Legal practice business, improve the user's career development ability, take the legal practice department as the main service object, study legal practice issues and major theories in the construction of the rule of law, including the rule of law, the rule of law campus, the rule of law society and corporate legal affairs.

2. On the one hand, the legal master solves a series of academic restrictions such as legal examination qualifications, job search and career development, and on the other hand, it also provides high-level talents for the legal career.

3. Legal examination business, to help users obtain professional qualifications, obtain the national unified legal professional qualification certificate, can be engaged in: judges, prosecutors, lawyers, notaries, administrative punishment decision review personnel, administrative reconsideration staff, administrative adjudication staff, legal counsel, arbitrator (legal) and other professions.

If you want to know more about the law exam, it is recommended to consult Fangyuan Zhonghe Education. Founded in 2009, Beijing Fangyuan Zhonghe Education Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Zhonghe Education) is an enterprise specializing in legal education. The main business of Zhonghe Education is vocational education and academic education, and it has three core businesses: the National Unified Legal Professional Qualification Examination, Legal Education and Legal Practice Training, which strives to provide users with high-quality comprehensive legal education services, and has a good reputation.

There are three teachers who have a relatively large influence in the criminal law market.

Bai Langtao, Liu Fengke, Xu Guanghua.

Depending on your personal preference, Bai Langtao's thinking logic is very strong, one link after another.

Liu Fengke's class time is too much, and I personally don't recommend it.

Xu Guanghua's 143 questions are very famous, and the teaching style is easy to understand, which is suitable for beginners. There are many examples that are closely related to life, which will give you a deeper understanding of legal concepts, such as whether the food I want is coming or not, the mistake of the object and the mistake of hitting the wrong; I have only you in my heart without him, accomplices, etc.

Personally, I recommend Mr. Xu Guanghua.

Identify a teacher, listen to the lecture notes, and the rest is to memorize the lecture notes and do the real questions. The handouts must be thin, it is best to use the small green skin or 119 directly, and there is generally no problem in memorizing the real questions five times and doing them five times.

My BAI experience is to report a certain judicial du

The face-to-face class of exam training zhi, about 40 days, nothing dao

The general theory must be looked at in detail, and the main focus of the sub-theory is to look at the crimes that are easily confused and the criminal composition of each crime (subject, subjective aspect, object, and objective aspect).

The main criminal law teachers for the judicial examination are as follows:

Chen Yongsheng is a postdoctoral fellow in law and an associate professor at the School of Law, Peking University. From 03 to 06, he participated in the revision of the National Judicial Examination Syllabus and the compilation of the National Judicial Examination Guidance Book of the Ministry of Justice.

Ruan Qilin is a professor at China University of Political Science and Law, a doctor of criminal law, a master's supervisor, an expert in criminal law, and an ace expert in judicial examination tutoring.

Liu Fengke holds a doctorate in law from Tsinghua University, and studied under Zhang Mingkai, a famous criminal law scholar and an important member of the proposition group of the Criminal Law Division. Mr. Liu's teaching is clear, serious and delicate.

Fang Peng is a lecturer at the School of Criminal Justice, China University of Political Science and Law. Peking University Law School, Master's and Doctor's Degree Studies. Published "The Essence of Criminal Law and the Essence of Past Questions in the National Judicial Examination".

You can come to our online school to listen to Mr. Chen's class, which is very good, and of course, the homework of several other teachers is worth listening to.

Generally speaking, if the target is wrong, it is to hit the wrong person, and to strike at the wrong person is to hit the wrong person.

In the case of object strikes, the conclusion of the specific conformity theory and the statutory conformity theory is the same. It is only in the case of combating errors that the distinction between the specific and statutory conformity doctrines is distinguished.

D This case belongs to the wrong person, and it is the wrong object, so the conclusion of the two is the same, and they are both murders. If this question becomes a problem, Ding wants to kill the enemy, and because of the inaccurate marksmanship, he kills the biological father who is standing next to the enemy, which is a mistake in the blow, and D is wrong.

Therefore, when you do this kind of question, you must first distinguish between the object error and the strike error, and then distinguish what is the difference between specific compliance and statutory compliance.

The main difference between the object error and the strike error is whether the suspect himself has a misunderstanding, mistaking A for B to kill is the target mistake, and hitting the wrong one is trying to kill A, but as a result of killing B because of poor marksmanship or the like.

With regard to the specific conformity theory and the statutory conformity theory, there is now a distinction only in the case of cracking down on errors. Option d is the object error, and both arguments consider it to be intentional homicide. If you want to kill your enemy instead, but you kill your father because of your poor marksmanship, the difference will be made.

The specific conformity theory holds that the punishment for the crimes of attempted intentional homicide and negligence causing death is combined, while the statutory conformity theory considers that the crime of intentional homicide is constituted.

To put it simply, the object mistake is to admit the mistake, and the strike error is to make the mistake.