Has the much discussed Xia Dynasty ever appeared in history?

It has existed, and the shadow of the Xia Dynasty can be seen from historical records and other documents, but it is too far away from the current time, so there is no very detailed record.

The Xia Dynasty has appeared in history. There are many ancient books in China that record the events of this dynasty. That's just a little older now. There are still relatively few cultural relics unearthed in the Xia Dynasty. That's why some people wonder if this dynasty really exists.

The Xia Dynasty has appeared in history. The Xia, Shang and Western Zhou dynasties are the three oldest dynasties in China, so they do exist.

Because no historical relics about the Xia Dynasty have been found, even if there are documents about the Xia Dynasty, most of them are mythological and difficult to investigate the authenticity. Therefore, it has been questioned by experts.

This is because the oracle bone inscription was only discovered during the Shang Dynasty, and there was no historical record before, so it was questioned by many experts.

Because a lot of things happened in the Xia Dynasty, there are some things that are difficult to understand, and I don't know why they happened.

This one definitely exists!

Upstairs is right. Because there is no writing in the Xia Dynasty. Exists only in the record.

The Xia Dynasty, the first hereditary dynasty recorded in Chinese history books. The Xia Dynasty is generally considered to be a state in the form of a tribal alliance. The "family world" in Chinese history began with the establishment of the Xia Dynasty.

From the Tang Dynasty, Yu to Xia, Shang Dynasty, and the Third Dynasty were all divided into feudal feudal eras, and the emperor and the princes divided and ruled. This is the encyclopedia narrative.

There is a country and a system, all of which are extremely conclusive affirmation of the existence of the Xia Dynasty. Without the foreshadowing of the Xia Dynasty, Shang Zhou could not have a relatively perfect system, after all, the emergence of all things has its origins.

As for the second question raised by the landlord, there are many answers. Some dynasties have been questioned by historians because of their short existence or geographical limitations.

The Xia Dynasty was questioned because the Xia Dynasty had no written language, and the earliest oracle bone inscriptions and gold inscriptions in China all existed in the Shang Dynasty.

Then why do you say that Western myths and stories would rather believe than believe in a Chinese dynasty?

This has always been disputed, and the Xia Dynasty should indeed exist, but there is no definite evidence. The Xia Dynasty did not have the strongest written evidence, nor did it have the strongest architectural evidence. The current excavation of a Xia Dynasty capital does not fully explain the existence of the Xia Dynasty.

But I'm sure it's there, and sooner or later there will be proof.

So far, it can only be necessarily, so far there is no written evidence to prove that the Xia Dynasty did exist, and our current understanding of the Xia Dynasty is based on legends, and of course there is no evidence to prove that the Xia Dynasty did not exist. To prove the existence of the Xia Dynasty, we must expect major discoveries and direct evidence in the archaeological community in the future, of course, the most important evidence is the text, otherwise all arguments will not be fruitful.

I clearly remember that in the first year of junior high school, the history teacher said that in the Xia Dynasty, because it was a relatively early imperial period, a certain generation of monarchs rode people around to play...

Since it has been handed down, he must have existed, but there is no sufficient archaeological evidence, so the West has been questioning, and many of the so-called "prehistoric civilization" legends in the West have not been confirmed in the end, such as Atlantis, such as the ancient Indian civilization. In fact, the history of the Shang Dynasty is also questioned, and the question is not whether it exists, but the form of its existence, after all, there are limited things that can be verified.

exists, but there is no archaeology to prove, like before, such as the Qing Dynasty, no one is archaeology, so far, the Qing Dynasty has only a hundred years of history, you want the archaeological team to find something that is four or five thousand years old at once, how can it be so simple? Moreover, the territory of the Xia Dynasty was not large, and it was not available everywhere, and the Xia Dynasty was also questioned before.

Modern historians have indirectly proved through evidence that tools and artifacts of that time existed in the Xia Dynasty.

The era of the Three Emperors and the Five Emperors, etc.

After all, there was no written language to test before the Shang Dynasty, so it can only be indirectly proved through other means.

The myth of Homer's epic poem** can be believed by Westerners as historical materials, so why should we question the existence of the Xia Dynasty?

Before the Shang Dynasty, there was no writing to examine!

The history of the pre-Qin period is full of legends

It's up to you to believe the historical records or not.

Further, believe it or not, Sima Qian.

Faith, there is; If you don't believe, you don't.

exists, you haven't learned "Xia Shang and Western Zhou, Eastern Zhou is divided into two sections, Spring and Autumn and Warring States, unified Qin and Han."

Exist, isn't the first emperor of the Xia Dynasty the day of Yu?

Before the Xia Dynasty, history should have envied the Three Emperors and Five Emperors, but according to historical records, only the Five Emperors are real. At that time, they also developed a lot of things that could make our human beings live a good life, and led our human beings to a better and better tomorrow. This history is very good, very good, and it is only after this history that the foundation for the progress of our humanity has been laid.

The history before the Xia Dynasty belongs to the Paleolithic Age, and there is no clear country and the Qing Dynasty is divided by the tribal calendar, and this part of the history provides the basis for the development of mythology and the unification of plates in China. Pre-brigade.

The history before the Xia Dynasty was the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period, when the society was very chaotic, and there were many monarchs such as rock lords, who belonged to opposites. At that time, the dynasty with the imperial waiting was often at war, and people's lives were also in dire straits. This period of history is very important for China, and it also promotes China's development, without this history, there would be no today's old and harmonious China.

The history before the Xia Dynasty was the period of the Five Emperors, at this time there was no class, it belonged to the same period, and people's lives were relatively simple.

The Xia Dynasty was preceded by the Yu Dynasty, and the history of the Yu Dynasty was about 1600 years.