How should the Chinese view the solution of the Syrian crisis?

Summary. Good afternoon, I'm glad to answer for you, the situation in Syria will continue to be chaotic, and now Syria is a battlefield where the United States and Western countries compete for interests, and they are all arranging in Syria for their own interests, competing in Syria, and they will not think about whether Syria is peaceful or not, nor will they think about the lives of Syrian people. This is a phenomenon in today's world, weak countries have no diplomacy, weak countries have no peace, I hope my answer will be helpful to you<>

Hello dear, I am a cooperative social livelihood gold medal mentor, and I have accumulated more than 1,000 hours of service! I have received your question, it will take some time to answer, please wait a while, it will take 3-5 minutes to get the result, and I hope Haihan, thank you for <>

Good afternoon, I'm glad to answer for you, the situation in Syria will continue to be chaotic, and now Syria is a battlefield where the United States and Western countries compete for interests, and they are all arranging in Syria for their own interests, competing in Syria, and they will not think about whether Syria is peaceful or not, nor will they think about the lives of Syrian people. This is a phenomenon in today's world, weak countries have no diplomacy, weak countries have no peace, I hope my answer will be helpful to you<>

I hope my answer is helpful to you, please give a thumbs up (comment in the lower left corner), look forward to your like, your efforts are very important to me, and your support is also the driving force for my progress. If you feel that my answer is still satisfactory, you can click on my avatar for one-on-one consultation. Finally, I wish you good health and a good mood!

From the perspective of the development of the world political landscape, the turmoil in Syria is a continuation and development of the changes in West Asia and North Africa. It is undeniable that these countries in the Middle East have encountered huge obstacles in their respective development paths due to imported inflationary pressures after the financial crisis, and the continuous sectarian strife of various political factions (Sunnis, Shiites) in the country has led to economic depression, low employment, social protests and mass violence. In any case, the situation in Syria remains a national development issue, an internal affair, not an international affair.

However, Syria's close proximity to Iraq, Jordan, Israel, Lebanon, Turkey and other countries echoes that of Iran, and its geographical location has extremely sensitive geopolitical overtones. Therefore, in the past, Syria has inadvertently played an extremely delicate and crucial role in regional affairs involving the sensitive nerves of the West, such as the Palestinian-Israeli peace talks, the reconstruction of Iraq, the counter-terrorism in the Middle East, the Iranian nuclear issue, and the Kurdish national issue. Moreover, to the great uneasiness of the Western world, the Assad family, which rules this geopolitical "battleground," continues to be a maverick that is incompatible with Western society.

In the face of the intensification of contradictions in Syria, Western countries naturally actively intervened, hoping to take this opportunity to promote change through pressure, and then achieve the goal of controlling the political situation and natural resources in the Middle East through the change of regime in Syria.

You're brilliant. Hehe.

This really won't, come and hang out.

One of the main reasons for this was the involvement of the military in student demonstrations. The most important thing is the political, economic, and military support of Western forces and Turkey.

The main reason is against unemployment prices**.

When the old Assad came to power in the 60s, he would confront Israel (inadvertently) as a card for the Soviet Union (just as Israel was a card for US intervention in the Middle East, the United States controlled the Middle East, that is, controlled the dollar trade in oil, that is, guaranteed the global use of the dollar). Syria and its ally Iran, both Shia Muslims, Syria withdrew from the confrontation with Israel, allowing Allah, which is also of the nature of the Islamic revolution (the same as Iran), to directly confront Israel (so that Allah becomes a card for Syria, these cards are all to fight for conditions at various negotiating tables), Syria does not have the absolute strength to help Allah, Iran helps Syria and Allah after the collapse of the Soviet Union, if the United States controls Iran, At that time, if the United States lowers oil prices, Russia will be wiped out into more than 20 countries, and after joining NATO one after another, the United States will raise oil prices again, and China's economy will not be able to develop, and there will be a danger of national extinction. Returning to the original topic, the United States cannot directly play Iran, because Iran still has cards like Syria and Allah in its hands.

Iran is not the Arab world, and it could have been said that it will fight, but Iran has allies in the Arab world, and this is its interface with the Arab world, so if the United States wants to play with Iran, it must first close the interface between Iran and the Arab world, that is, Syria.

To sum up, the core interests of the Iranian world are the last obstacle to the unification of the world by the United States.