What is the difference between making and making? What is the difference between making and making?

The difference between making and making is "doing" and "doing".

First, the meaning is different.

1. Do, pinyin is zuò, a common verb in Chinese, which is used in a wide range of ways, from absence to existence; To do is to make, and to produce the meaning of this thing – to do business, to cook, to work, to make faces, etc.

2, as , read as zuò, zuō, first seen in the oracle bone inscription, its original meaning is to begin to control the tortoise, "rituals" has the words "people sit as turtles", this word is people with a knife to scrape, drill and carve tortoise shells, and then burn, depending on its crack omen for divination. By extension, it refers to making, initiating, rising, initiating, acting, writing, etc.

Second, the semantic content is different.

1. The action of "making" is not strong, and the meaning is relatively abstract and generalized. Such as: committing crimes, guaranteeing, cheating, doing evil, style, stalking, valuing, face, counting, speed, acting, falsifying, role, testifying, making accuracy (counting), hype, cooperation, collaboration, operation, prank.

2. The action of "doing" is strong, and the meaning is more specific and real. Such as: cooking, cooking, grimacing, housework, gestures, postures, games, needlework.

Third, the grammatical features are different.

1. The object is a two-syllable verb, and "作" is mostly used, in this case, the object becomes a nominalized gerund, and the verb of "作" has been blurred; For example, make a report, make a test, make a comparison, make a supplement, make a change, make a process, make a point, investigate, fight, analyze, contribute, respond, and introduce.

2. The object is a two-syllable noun, and "do" is often used to indicate doing something or something. Such as: doing engineering, doing homework, doing marking, doing housework, doing topics, doing things, doing business, doing property, doing projects, doing culture, doing business.

As for the commonly used term "make", it is used in much the same way as the former.

The difference between "make" and "make":

1、""Make" and "make" refer to different actions. Actions that are achieved through specific actions are used as "make". And the action achieved through abstract behavior is "made".

2、"The subject object of the "make" and "make" apps is different. "The subject of "make" is mostly a specific person, and its object has no more specific content or is difficult to describe in language; The subject of "make" is mostly organizational, and its object is often rich in more specific content.

3、"The semantics of the expressions "make" and "make" are different. "The semantics of "make" generally do not make demands on others, and subjectively do not emphasize why they "do" in this way. For example, "make", "contribute", etc.

The semantics expressed are mostly requirements for others, and there is a clear purpose for why they "do". For example, "make a provision", "make a choice", etc.

The difference between <> making and making is: different references, different usages, and different emphasis.

1. Referring to different: make: refers to changing one thing into another useful thing; Make: It refers to the materialization and creation of something that is not there.

2. Different usage: all actions achieved through specific behaviors are "made". Generally speaking, the subject is mostly a specific person, and its object does not have a more specific content, or although it exists, it is difficult to describe it in language.

For example, "make", "contribute", "make achievements", "set an example", etc.; All actions that are achieved through abstract actions are "made". Generally speaking, the subject is mostly organization, and its object is often rich in more specific content, such as "making provisions", "making choices", "making concessions", "making strategic deployments", "giving instructions", "making decisions", "making judgments", and so on.

3. The focus is different: make: focus on physical changes; Make: Focus on non-physical changes that are abstract.

The difference between "make" and "make":

1、""Make" and "make" refer to different actions. Actions that are achieved through specific actions are used as "make". And the action achieved through abstract behavior is "made".

2、"The subject object of the "make" and "make" apps is different. "The subject of "make" is mostly a specific person, and its object has no more specific content or is difficult to describe in language; The subject of "make" is mostly organizational, and its object is often rich in more specific content.

3、"The semantics of the expressions "make" and "make" are different. "The semantics of "make" generally do not make demands on others, and subjectively do not emphasize why they "do" in this way. For example, "make", "contribute", etc.

The semantics expressed are mostly requirements for others, and there is a clear purpose for why they "do". For example, "make a provision", "make a choice", etc.

(1) "Make" and "make", there is a literal difference between the two. In terms of verb meaning, both "do" and "do" can mean to engage in a certain activity. But "do" is often used to mean to be, to act and act or to write and work, while "do" also means to make and make.

ii) "Make" and "make" are different for the act. All actions that are achieved through specific behaviors are "made"; All actions that are achieved through abstract actions are "made".

3) The precedent of "make" and "make" is different. Generally speaking, the preposition of "make" is mostly for specific people, while the preposition of "make" is mostly for organizations or collectives.

For example, "contributing", "making choices", "making concessions", and "making decisions", here "contributions", "choices", and "decisions" are not concrete and direct things; And the objects involved in the actions of "making a grimace", "making a difficult action" and "making a difficult problem" are all concrete things.

The difference between making and making:

Both "do" and "do" mean "to engage in a certain activity", and it is generally believed that "do" means a concrete action, and "do" means an abstract action.

1. All actions that are achieved through specific behaviors are "made". Generally speaking, the subject is mostly a specific person, and its object does not have a more specific content, or although it exists, it is difficult to describe it in language.

For example, "training and making", "contributing", "making achievements", "setting an example" and so on.

2. All actions that are realized through abstract behaviors are "made". In general, the subject is mostly organizational, and its object is often rich in more specific content.

For example, "make provisions", "make choices", "make concessions", "make strategic deployments", "give instructions", "make decisions", "make judgments", and so on. In addition, "make" has the meaning of "pretending", such as "making a half-dead appearance", and in this sense, "making a grimace" can also be used as "making a grimace".

(1) "Make" and "make", there is a literal difference between the two. In terms of verb meaning, both "do" and "do" can mean to engage in a certain activity. But "do" is often used to mean to be, to act and act or to write and work, while "do" also means to make and make.

ii) "Make" and "make" are different for the act. All actions that are achieved through specific behaviors are "made"; All actions that are achieved through abstract actions are "made".

3) The precedent of "make" and "make" is different. Generally speaking, the preposition of "make" is mostly for specific people, while the preposition of "make" is mostly for organizations or collectives.

For example, "contributing", "making choices", "making concessions", and "making decisions", here "contributions", "choices", and "decisions" are not concrete and direct things; And the objects involved in the actions of "making a grimace", "making a difficult action" and "making a difficult problem" are all concrete things.