Which is better in Canon 400d Nikon D40X Nikon D60 and what is the difference in performance?

The D40 and D40X are simplified machines that can't be simplified anymore, so forget it! It's better to choose Canon 400D, 400D is at least a serious DSLR. If you must choose Nikon, you should also choose a device with a D80 or higher.

The D40 and D40X don't have a motor, eliminating the on-camera autofocus drive motor, resulting in a lighter body, but this also means that it can only be autofocused with an ultrasonic motor lens. It is not possible to drive Nikon's AF-series AF-series lenses without motors, so only Nikon's AF-S series lenses can be used! Let's buy the 400D, which is fully compatible with Canon's EF and EF-S (APS-C DSLR lenses) series of lenses, and of course many side lenses.

If you want to play Nikon and Chase's manual head, you can also buy the D40X!

The main consideration for choosing a camera is the lens, and you can buy the body of whichever lens you like. As the saying goes, Nikon's wide-angle Canon's telephoto (just referring to the two companies having their own strengths, not that Nikon's telephoto or Canon's wide-angle are bad). It depends on what you're shooting.

In terms of body performance, it is meaningful to professionals, ordinary users and beginners do not have much significance, and most professional photographers are still using film SLR (the color reproduction and resolution of film are still higher than digital).

Nikon, Canon (or other brands) all have their advantages, but they also have their drawbacks. The needle has no two ends, and the words must be said at both ends. Nikon and Canon have to argue about who is higher and who is lower, and the argument will never end. It's up to you to see which one you like.

If you think about buying a 400D from the body alone, you can buy either from the lens (a better lens)!

Please be careful when choosing Olympus, Olympus' photosensitive system is 4:3 (lens conversion rate x2), the sensor size is fixed and will never produce the full frame, even if the full frame is developed in the future, I don't know if the lens can still be used!

The 400D is Canon's entry-level machine, and the workmanship is average. However, 400D+17-85IS is still very cost-effective, D40X and D60 are Nikon's new machines, but there is no body drive motor, and it cannot autofocus when using traditional AF lenses, which must be noted, in other words, D40X and D60 have lost the advantages of Nikon's lens group. It is recommended that you consider 400d+17-85is

In addition to this, there is also an Olympus E510 set of machines, which is also cost-effective, and has fallen below 4000.

The D50 has a fuselage motor, and it is a 5-point focus, which feels better than the D60, but after all, the machine is old, and the noise resistance and other aspects are not as good as the D60. If there is still one on the market, D50 is recommendedBut there is a good chance that there are only second-hand ones.

D40 and D60 are still D60 in comparison. However, neither of them has a fuselage motor, so it feels very chicken!

d60 is not a color, a prime of life, are very right from this **!! There is no motor anyway, there is an autofocus lens, what are you afraid of! The key to the camera is color, the function is enough, the lens upgrade 55-200 is not expensive, it is very right for your money, so D60 is a good choice, Canon EOS450D is also good, ** more expensive than D60, and the function is more than D60, but the color is not as pure as D60, so stand in the perspective of color, and ** angle, choose D60,, if you stand in the perspective of function, EOS450D, and Sony

A300 is available.

Additional note D40

D50 pixels are really not good, D50 is discontinued, or D60!

What's so tangled in this, it's obviously the best D4, a full-width machine, and D7000 and 60D are not in the same grade. D4 costs $6,000. The yuan should be more than 40,000.

As for how much better the D4 is better than the D7000, there is no way to say this, as if the A-Class Mercedes is much better than the Toyota Vios is the same reason.

d4 should be compared to 1dx. Not bad money to buy 1dx

If you're not a professional photographer, the D7000 is perfectly sufficient.

Many friends have also shot very good ** with D90, and they have also won awards.

Words for a simple comparison:

Compare Nikon D80 and Canon 40D, the latter was launched a whole year later than the former, although both are quasi-professional SLRs at the level of tens of millions of pixels, but the technical update cannot be ignored, for example, the 40D display size is larger, 3 inches, D80 is inches, playback**, the difference in the size and effect of the display screen is still quite obvious;

**, the latter is nearly 2k more expensive, and the lens group of the latter is stronger than the former in other aspects.

One thing to note is that most of Nikon's SLRs do not have a driver motor, so if the level of the body is not enough, it is difficult to drive more advanced and high-end DX lenses, or it is difficult to play the efficiency of high-end lenses, while Canon does not have such a problem, that is, Canon can use a cheaper body, such as 400D, to drive all the red circle L lenses, which has no effect on the function of the lens.

As for**,Although the 40D** is slightly higher,But as I said,You can choose Canon's cheaper body,Use the rest of the money on the lens,After all, the lens is still the determining factor in **quality。 The choice of lens, the water is also relatively deep, if you are only used for tourism, do not pursue the quality of imaging, you can buy a suite, if you want a single lens, there is a lot of choice, there are many types, you need your specific requirements.

Going back to your question, mine is both, I've already said it before, but I recommend Canon more, as for which one is up to you.