Nikon D5200 18 105 and Canon 650D 18 135 are both pullovers, which is better? 10

D5200 just came out** inflated. But comparatively speaking, Nikon's lens 18-105 is cheaper. The quality is at a higher level, but the Canon zoom is large, the difficulty is high, and the ** is naturally expensive, and there is actually no essential difference.

At the same time, it should be pointed out that the threshold of the camera is the key, which means that even the highest-end entry is not as good as the mid-range one of a few years ago. For example, D80 and other discontinued ones. Don't look at the focus, go to the pixels, look at the processor, etc., you have to know that the image quality is only related to the lens and the image sensor.

None of the others are necessarily related. For example, the lens is the graphics card of the computer, the image sensor is the reality screen, the pixel is the size of the reality screen, the processor is the processor of the computer, and the image quality you see mainly depends on the image sensor and lens. There is also a difference between the low-end pixels and the high-end pixels, and the actual pixels are magnified.

Blindly improving the pixel without advanced noise reduction ability is harmful. This is also the reason why many mid-to-high-end cameras do not have higher pixels and processors than they do at the entry level. But the lens and sensor are definitely better than the beginner.

There are also parameters on the Internet that are misleading, and they will not publish the real core stuff. When you look at the parameters, do you think that the entry parameters are completely explosive high-end cameras in 08? First determine the money, then determine the threshold, then determine the brand, and finally choose the same ** with a good reputation.

Don't worry too much about it, a threshold thing is not much more effective. It's all a set of machines, and the portraits are bought for 50 sets, and the only regret is that Nikon doesn't have a fuselage motor at the entrance, and it's not good to use a lens without a motor, but the Canon motors are all mounted on the lens.

Decisive D5200!

The focus is much stronger than the 650D, and the pixels are higher than the 650D, although the same APSC format, the Nikon uses a Sony sensor so it is a little larger than the Canon. And the Nikon entry-level machine has much better workmanship and a better feel in the hand than the Canon.

In short, the performance of the 5200 is completely out of the 650. Of course, this is not to say that the 650D is not good, and the cost performance is not as high as the D5200.

See for yourself, I seriously recommend the 5200, and if you prefer the Canon the 650d is certainly fine.

For portraits, a large zoom may not be enough, and you can buy a small spittoon if you have spare money.

In addition, the difference between the zoom lens 18-105 and 18-135 telephoto ends is very small, and the difference between 105 and 135 is very small, so there is no need to worry about Canon because of this.

The case hasn't been closed yet!

Let's choose D5200.

1.D5200 sensor 24 million pixels, > 650D, 18 million pixels.

2.D5200 Image sensor size》 650d (the larger the size, the better the image quality)3The D5200 focusing system uses 39-point AF and 650D 9-point AF.

4.2016 zone metering for D5200 metering system > 650D zone 63.

5.D5200 shutter life 100,000 cycles, > 650D 50,000 cycles.

6.18-105 uses ED ultra-low dispersion lenses > 18-135 does not.

Support up to 100,000 ISO (night mode) > 650D up to 64008The D5200 supports HDR > 650D none.

9.The D5200 supports multi** > 650D none.

Support for shooting sketch animations (although the number of frames is too small) > 650d none.

11.Nikon Colors Rich > Canon Colors are flat (not as good as Nikon even after doing it) can import Optimized Mode (which is the legendary curve) > 650D is not supported.

Support spot measurement linkage > 650d does not support (Canon only supports spot measurement linkage with 1DX) looked at your question Nikon is suitable for shooting landscapes Canon is suitable for shooting portraits, this statement is basically unfounded.

Just take a look at the works taken with Nikon equipment by the online photographer "Black Face".

From the point of view of the focusing system and metering system of these two machines, Nikon D5200 wins completely, so it is recommended to choose.

More than 6000**Why not buy Nikon D90? There is a big difference between the mid-range machine and the entry-level machine, don't look at the D90, it seems that the pixel is much lower, but the feeling of using it is definitely different.

Your machine and lens are enough to deal with, but you don't know if your photographic light is a sun lamp or a flash, first, white balance is very important, choose white balance normally, and the color reproduction is realistic. If you are really not allowed, you can only manually adjust the white balance, take a piece of white paper to adjust it (the player moves to adjust the white balance, put the white paper in the light to shoot the clothes, press the shutter on the white paper, and the machine will adjust the appropriate white balance, I don't understand the camera manual).

Second, the light is very important, the closer the light is to the clothes, the stronger the light, the aperture can be narrowed, the clearer the details of the clothes, the general aperture of the flash is f10-f16, the sun lamp is not as strong as the flash, and the aperture is larger.

Third, keep the shutter speed at least 125th of a second, otherwise the details of the photo will be blurred if it is too slow. If the speed is not guaranteed, increase the ISO appropriately, but do not exceed ISO400

Fourth, the lighting should also be exquisite, generally 3 lights are enough, one main light line is the strongest, the clothes are racked, from the top of the clothes to light (as if the sun is shining, according to the different fabrics, can be the top, or the side top), the remaining 2 lights should be slightly weaker than the main light (or a little farther away), on both sides of the clothes or back, side light, to maintain the contour light of the clothes.

After doing the above steps, you should be able to take a more satisfactory photo.

If you have decided to choose between these two combinations, it is recommended to choose 18-105, the focal length is enough, it is good to make a hang-up head, there is no need to buy two dog heads.

Reasons: 1. The imaging quality of the two combinations is the same, and it doesn't matter if the difference is 95 focal lengths, and the 200 end is not commonly used. Use only when using a telephoto to create depth of field. The most important thing is not to buy 2 dog heads to keep at home, one dog head is enough, save money to buy a large aperture fixed focus.

2. The two heads should be exchanged for trouble, easy to dust, and inconvenient to carry.

3. Don't pay too much attention to the focal length, the focal length of about 55 is already the most commonly used (it has reached 85 on the APS system), not to mention the focal length of 105 converted on the APS system?

4. Personally, I think it's better to buy one dog head than to buy two dog heads. Or simply add some money to buy the cheapest large-aperture zoom head (if you don't mind the sub-factory lens), such as the Tamron 17-50 Constant, with image stabilization, **3500 or so. Use this head to hang up the camera to shoot the bokeh background**, then you don't need to use a long focal length to make it up, the real bokeh background, the bright shutter is improved, and it is not easy to shake off.

I believe that it will not be worse than the original dog's head at the same aperture and the same focal length.

Direct configuration 18-105 for family travel, imaging ***, single-head convenient. There is no need for 55-200, buy a lens purely for the focal length.

18-105 is one of the welfare heads of N, it is a cost-effective head in the zoom, and it is definitely more convenient than two lenses if you like to travel.

18-105 is highly recommendedWalking the world in one shot, it is easy to get into the dust when the old head is replaced.

Families and tours 18-105 are sufficient

55-200 is not necessary

18-105 is enough, and the two heads have to be changed back and forth, which is inconvenient.