How to understand the phrase filial son under the stick?

Nowadays, many children are treasures in the eyes of parents, and parents love their children too much and are reluctant to beat and scold their children, resulting in children's indulgence, so children lack rational knowledge and understanding of many problems. Parents are too good to their children, and the children are a little embarrassed, and they don't know how thick the sky is, so the saying that filial piety comes out under the stick also makes sense. <>

Parents are the ones who give their children life, so children should be unconditionally obedient and filial to their parents, so parents also feel that it is a normal thing to beat and scold their children, the purpose is not to scold, but to hope that their children can learn a lesson, and not let their children become a bad child.

As long as the child has a certain awareness, there is no need for parents to beat the child, as long as the child is obedient, I believe that many problems can be solved.

If excessive abuse of children, it will hurt the child's self-esteem, and it will also destroy the relationship between parents and children.

There are many bear children now, and in the final analysis, it is the poor discipline of the parents, and the son is not the fault of the father. Children have no contact with the outside world and do not understand the rules and order of society, so they need to be taught by their parents. And now more and more children are pampered and doted on by their parents, resulting in them not having a sense of awe, not being afraid of heaven and earth, so they are always in trouble.

Therefore, the saying that filial piety comes out under the stick is not unreasonable.

In ancient times, the father was the son, no matter what the parents were, if your parents gave you life, you must obey and be filial to them unconditionally. Therefore, it is considered natural for parents to hit their children, and this sentence came into being. Because children are naughty by nature.

Sometimes the teaching of persuasion does not make a significant difference, and it is necessary to use violence to instill awe in the children so that they can understand the rules. <>

However, now we do not advocate this. Because in this way, if the degree of beating and scolding is not well controlled, it can easily become child abuse and break the law. However, it does not mean that parents cannot beat and scold their children, which requires children to be able to control it.

Because sometimes it is difficult to play a role in reasoning alone, of course, if parents have a better way to make their children understand the rules and obey, this method of beating and scolding can naturally be used without it.

I don't think this sentence is scientific, and it is an erroneous statement left over from feudal society, so I don't think this sentence can be adopted.

I don't think this sentence is applicable anymore, children can no longer be educated by beating, it used to be like this in every family, children have no comparison, they feel that it doesn't matter, but now it's different.

I don't think this applies to the current approach to education, because it can lead to physical and mental abnormalities in children.

I don't think this sentence is applicable anymore, because the current education advocates no corporal punishment, which will cause a shadow on the child's psyche.

This sentence is not suitable for current education at all, this is an ancient saying, in today's education, parents and children should still be in an equal perspective, so that children can be more excellent.

I don't agree with this sentence, because hitting the child often will hurt the child, make the child more and more rebellious, and also cause the child to have an inferiority complex.

This sentence only had a certain effect on the time, but it did not have much impact on the current people, and the current people are unwilling to educate their children in this way, which will cause a certain shadow to the children.

First of all, when educating children, some violent methods can be added appropriately, so that children can remember for a long time, and it can also help them correct.

The next sentence is "A good person comes out of the yellow wattle strip", which is also an ancient precept of family education, which can be used for children and can also be used to teach a daughter-in-law. It means beating their own children with bamboo sticks, and in the old Chinese believed that only by fighting the false and defeated sparrows, the children would be obedient and good people, and would honor the elderly.

"Filial piety under the stick" is a separate folk saying, and there is no fixed next sentence early. However, it is common for people to juxtapose two foreign words with similar meanings to strengthen the tone. Commonly used are "filial piety under the stick, no success if you don't fight", "filial piety under the stick, good people under the yellow wattle".

The original meaning was to ask adults to discipline children strictly, and children could not succeed if they did not fight, and only by beating could they become talents. This sentence has always been used as a mantra for adults to educate their children, but in fact, this sentence is actually wrong, and this kind of education is an irreparable harm to children.

In fact, even in ancient times, there were a series of family laws for parents to educate their children, and children would only be educated with sticks after they violated the family law. But now with the progress of society, there is no such thing as family law at all, and it is entirely because of the support of parents to educate children, which is actually very unfair to children. In educating children, it does not mean that you can't beat or scold, but you should use the right method, not blindly beat and scold.

The real meaning of this sentence is that a father with a strict educational philosophy may educate a very filial son.

It really means to discipline the children strictly, but I don't think the development of the children in the violence team is good.

The true meaning of the phrase "filial piety comes from under the stick" is to educate children that they should be serious and serious.

No, in fact, this is a wrong word, if it is very embarrassing and outdated, beating and scolding the child, the child will hate his parents for a lifetime, and it is also illegal to beat the child, so the stick beating will be subject to legal responsibility.

This sentence is absolutely wrong, this sentence was only circulated among the people in the past, and there was no such thing in the major ancient works, and Confucius and other educators did not say this sentence. If education were so simple, would there still be mediocrity? Whether ancient or modern, Chinese or foreign, beating and scolding is not recommended by everyone, and scolding will destroy the child's nature, either silent and unassertive, or rebellious.

The real meaning of "filial piety under the stick" is that children must be educated more in order to educate well.

It is said that it is necessary to educate children more in order to educate well, and a strict father may educate a very filial son.

This is to say that strict fathers produce filial sons, this is mainly about the concept of education, and I think that children should be strictly managed.

Web Links.

If you don't fight, you can't fight it, you can't fight it, and if you don't fight it, will the filial piety theory under the stick cultivate a bar essence?

If you don't fight, you can't fight it, you can't fight it, and if you don't fight it, will the filial piety theory under the stick cultivate a bar essence?

If you don't fight, you can't fight it, you can't fight it, and if you don't fight it, will the filial piety theory under the stick cultivate a bar essence?

I'm telling you that there is no right or wrong in this world. One in the world is you29

I think children should be beaten if they don't obey! Fight to the death! If you don't obey you, you can be put to death.