-
Summary. Image sensor: The Sony TX66 uses a 16.2-million-pixel Exmor R CMOS sensor, while the Sony T700 uses a 10.1-million-pixel CCD sensor.
The higher the pixel count of the sensor, the better the image quality of the camera. Screen size: The Sony TX66 has a screen size of inches, while the Sony T700 has a screen size of inches.
The larger the screen size, the easier it will be to operate and view the camera. Operation: The Sony TX66 uses a touch screen operation, while the Sony T700 uses a traditional button operation.
Touchscreen operation can be more intuitive and convenient, but it needs to keep the screen clean and sensitive. Body thickness: The Sony TX66 has a body thickness of millimeters, while the Sony T700 has a thickness of millimeters.
The thinner the body, the more portable the camera will be to carry and use. In general, there are certain differences between Sony TX66 and Sony T700 in terms of image quality performance, screen size, operation mode and body thickness.
Which is better, Sony TX66 or Sony T700.
Image sensor: The Sony TX66 uses a 16.2-million-pixel Exmor R CMOS sensor, while the Sony T700 uses a 10.1-million-pixel CCD sensor. The higher the pixel count of the sensor, the better the image quality of the camera.
Screen size: The Sony TX66 has a screen size of inches, while the Sony T700 has a screen size of inches. The larger the screen size, the easier it will be to operate and view the camera.
Operation: The Sony TX66 uses a touch screen operation, while the Sony T700 uses a traditional button operation. Touch screen operation can be more intuitive and convenient, but it is necessary to keep the screen clean and sensitive.
The thickness of the body of the Sony TX66 is millimeters, while the thickness of the fuselage of the Sony T700 is millimeters. The thinner the body, the more portable the camera will be to carry and use.
In general, there are certain differences between Sony TX66 and Sony T700 in terms of image quality performance, screen size, operation mode and body thickness.
TX66 is better.
Are both CCDs.
No, the Sony TX66 uses a 16.2-million-pixel Exmor R CMOS sensor, while the Sony T700 uses a 10.1-million-pixel CCD sensor. Depending on the type of image sensor, the image quality of the camera will be poor. CMOS sensors are generally better than CCD sensors.
The TX66 is the camera.
So which is better, Canon IXUS120is or Sony TX66?
Or tx66
Hello? May I ask which is better, Canon IXUS 120is or Sony T66? More worth buying?
TX66 will be more cost-effective and will be more worth buying.
The second-hand Sony TX66 is the most suitable to buy it.
Between five hundred and seven hundred.
-
If I want to recommend it, I think Sony TX100 is more worth buying, because Sony TX100 is the flagship model in the Sony TX series last year, in addition to the beautiful appearance of this lead and portable operation, Sony TX100V also has a new static 3D shooting function, but also built-in GPS function, new bokeh shooting mode, and the continuation of HDR, intelligent panoramic shooting and beautification and other functions, more playable. The main disadvantage of the Sony TX100 is that the Sony TX100 is a 4x optical zoom. And the Sony TX66 is 5 times.
There is also 2 million fewer pixels than the 18 million pixels of the Sony TX66. Otherwise, there is no difference between the two cameras.
As for Sony TX66, the advantage of Sony TX66 is that the appearance is particularly pleasing to the eye, and the hardware function is also stronger, especially suitable for girls, very small and lightweight, and the operation is also very simple. The disadvantage is that the price is about 500 yuan more expensive than the Sony TX100.
Sony TX100 2012-9-5 Ref** 1371 to 1600
Sony TX66 2012-9-5 Ref** 1960 to 2376
Hopefully, the above information can be helpful to you.
-
Both the TX and IXUS series (e.g., TX66, and IXUS 510) belong to a type of DC (Card Machine, Automatic Digital Camera).
I still prefer Canon.
1.From the lens: Canon's telescopic lens has a larger amount of low beam and a maximum aperture value than the Sony TX's periscope lens, which is conducive to shooting in a shaky state. However, the maximum aperture of the periscope lens of the Sony TX series is not enough to take pictures at night.
2.From the menu: The Sony TX's touch menu is more difficult to operate, which is not comparable to the control of most Canon cameras with keyboard shortcuts (except for Canon touch phones), and the Canon camera ID menu is very user-friendly, with a version of the user interface that balances control and gorgeous appearance.
3.From the technology:
Canon's Imagestabilizer is one of the best card machines in its class, reducing shutter speed by 2-4 stops, which is very helpful for night shooting.
Canon's DigiC image processor provides fast processing, including noise reduction and continuous shooting, to achieve clear images even at high light sensitivity, reducing noise and noise, and improving image quality.
3.From personal experience: I think that Canon's imaging is much better than Sony's, that's for sure, and I'm also a long-time Canon user.
I once tried Sony's W350, TX5, and the imaging was not very realistic. Canon's camera can capture details such as freckles on the face, which Sony can't do or has omitted from the camera. In fact, the most important thing about the camera is to be real, not fake.
P-graphs can be post-processed to have the most room for development.
PS: Canon now also has a camera with dual image stabilization technology (HS=CMOS+IS), so night shooting is not a problem.
Let's talk about Sony.
The W series now seems to be a big step forward. CMOS imaging has a very good performance, the maximum aperture of this camera is already very good, effectively reducing hand shake during night scenes, you can shoot night scenes by hand, and the zoom magnification is also relatively large, which is easier to capture. The 24mm wide-angle lens is also suitable for group shots.
Sony's TX series has always been the first choice for those who are bright, it looks beautiful and easy to carry, but this comes at the expense of picture quality, so. Not all cameras are perfect.
Many of Sony's cameras have 16 million pixels that are obviously inflated, and it doesn't make sense to increase the pixels when the sensor is 1 inch, it's just a gimmick for businesses.
I choose one of the two and I choose Canon (ixus series such as ixus 510).
However, the Canon camera IXUS series basically does not have manual functions, and neither do the Sony T and W series.
Therefore, if you want to practice your hands, it is best to buy Canon's PowerShot high-end series, and some of them can also compete with SLR.
Sony H20 pixels 10.1 million sensor size 1 inch light change 10 times equivalent to 35mm focal length 38-380mm 2200 Nikon L100 pixels 10 million image sensor 1 inch light change 15 times f = equivalent to 35mm focal length 28-420mm about 2100 Nikon P90 pixels 12.1 million image sensor 1 inch light change 24 times f = equivalent to 35mm focal length 26-624mm about 2800 >>>More
There are English abbreviations on the motherboard, two wires when the computer switches and switches the button, and the corresponding needle on the motherboard is power restart >>>More
Personal suggestions and opinions for your reference: Sony T900 is a card player with a periscope lens, and the imaging effect is slightly lower than that of the Sony W290 card player with a telescopic lens. Sony T900, Sony W290 is a fully automatic camera, for a variety of complex and changeable shooting environments, can not be manually adjusted aperture, shutter and other parameters to obtain accurate **, but can cope with a variety of complex and changeable shooting environments through various shooting modes pre-made in the machine, but in the case of poor light, especially when shooting night scenes, the imaging effect will not be ideal, but the general home is fully competent. >>>More
Brother, I deeply sympathize, the sea is salty, and the phone falls into the sea. You can change your phone. It's not good to fix. >>>More
It has long been surpassed, so it only makes electrical appliances, Sony does, Samsung is doing, but Samsung, non-staple food, financial management, washing machines, white goods, as well as familiar TVs, cameras, mobile phones, and hard disks are all doing, and the trial production share exceeds Sony in many aspects, such as mobile phones, hard disks, washing machines, and so on.