Seek help! Rural land dispute issues! Those who understand the law enter! 40

There is no way to do it in the countryside, and the people in the village are against your words.

The countryside is now a lawless zone that cannot be controlled by law.

Only money and violence work, helplessly, this is the current situation in our countryside.

The court can't handle it either, because in the eyes of the peasants, the court is a fart.

At the grassroots level of our country, the status quo is that etiquette collapses, and morality and law are all illusory.

It embodies the relationship between people in primitive society, relying on self-reliance, but.

The simplicity of primitive society has disappeared, and the conscience has been smoked by the lust for profit of modern society.

It is the orphans and widows who are bullied.

You'd better find the township government now and use the influence of the village committee through the township government and the township.

It may be useful to do ideological work in the village and improve the relationship between the people in the village and you.

Be self-reliant! Brothers.

In the case of legal proceedings, you can apply to the court for enforcement. But in reality, the intensity of execution is average, and what if you don't let you plant well around you after you come back? It's better to make a lease agreement with someone in the village who can settle things and want land, and let someone else take over after enforcing it.

For your problem, first of all, you should find the village cadres, let the village cadres mediate, if the mediation fails, and then find the township cadres in charge of your village to deal with it, this kind of land encroachment problem, generally at the grassroots level can be solved, but if you find the above two places have not been solved, you have to find the land management bureau again, and there is a lawsuit.

According to the provisions of the "Rural Land Contract Law of the People's Republic of China" Article 51 Where a dispute arises due to land contracting, the parties may resolve it through negotiation, or may request the villagers' committee or the township (town) people** to mediate.

If the parties are unwilling to negotiate or mediate, or if the negotiation or mediation fails, they may apply to the rural land contract arbitration institution for arbitration, or they may directly file a lawsuit with the people's court.

Article 52: Where a party is dissatisfied with an arbitral award made by a rural land contract arbitration institution, it may file a lawsuit with the people's court within 30 days of receiving the award. If the lawsuit is not filed within the time limit, the ruling shall take legal effect.

Article 53: Where any organization or individual infringes upon the contracting party's right to contract and operate land, it shall bear civil liability.

Therefore, in your case, if the other party is unwilling to negotiate or mediate, or if the negotiation or mediation fails, you can apply to the rural land contract arbitration institution for arbitration, or you can directly file a lawsuit with the people's court. However, you must provide relevant evidence to prove that the land originally belonged to your family.

This cannot be litigated directly in court.

There's a department called the Rural Land Contract Arbitration Board, and you go to them.

"After the conclusion of the contract, either party shall not terminate the contract and change the content of the agreement. In case of breach of agreement, the village will be liable for three times the total annual fee payable. This clause is invalid and violates the basic principles of contract law, the contract can be changed by negotiation, and the court can be sued to revoke the contract if it cannot be negotiated.

It is suggested that the two parties resolve the dispute through negotiation, and the village committee may be requested to mediate.

This contract is useless, let's not talk about whether it is legal or not; No matter what the content is, the premise for the two parties to agree to take effect is that the village committee seals, but the village committee did not seal at all at that time, so this is a piece of waste paper.

1. If the relevant agreement has been signed and compensated for the land expropriation six years ago, and the company has applied for the land certificate, the reasons put forward by the villagers are unreasonable.

It is recommended to collect a full set of land use procedures and a full set of procedures for approving the construction of staff dormitories, and provide them to the villagers for their cooperation.

Land use procedures include land acquisition procedures, compensation agreements, planning permissions, land certificates, etc., and construction approval procedures include planning permits, construction permits, etc.

If the compensation agreement has been signed six years ago, and the company has completed all the formalities, and ** only pays part of the compensation, it is the relationship between the villagers and **, and has nothing to do with the company.

As for land compensation**, it should be based on the actual time of land acquisition, that is, it should be based on six years ago**.

Villagers planting crops on the expropriated land are illegal occupation of other people's land, and the company has the right to require them to remove it without compensation.

The village director sold our team to a family in the east of the village, but they wrote a receipt at that time, and there was no person in charge and no Zen digging chapter"Selling" is illegal and invalid! 2.

A receipt, no person in charge, and no chapter "Illegal, invalid!" Because: the land is owned by the state, and "the village chief (who has no power) sold our team to a family in the east of the village".

The threshing field has been used by my family for several generations, and the threshing field village was not divided into households when the land was contracted, but we have been using it] said, no, there must be evidence to prove that the right to use the threshing field belongs to you!

Is it possible to build a house in that wheat field? If you have sufficient and conclusive evidence that the right to use the threshing field is yours, you can build a house.

To whom should that threshing floor belong? If you do not have sufficient and conclusive evidence to prove that the right to use the wheat field belongs to you, then it belongs to the state (collective).

Rural land is a form of collective ownership. Therefore, no one can illegally transfer collective land, so the village cadres have no right to transfer the land, for the land you said has always been your home, only temporarily, for the construction of a house on the wheat field, this must be approved by the relevant land departments, otherwise it is illegal to ambush.

1. The other party has violated your easement.

2. Easement refers to the right to use the real estate of others in accordance with the contract for the convenience of using one's own real estate or to improve its efficiency. First, an easement is a usufructuary right established in accordance with the agreement of the parties. Second, an easement is a usufructuary right that exists in the immovable property of another person.

Third, an easement is a usufructuary right established for the convenience of easement land.

3. Coordinate and resolve on the basis of facts and the law.

4. Through legal proceedings.

All of China is a country! The village land is for collective use, and the hukou is not in the village, and there is no right to use the village land at all! The land is not your private property! Even if you want to give it to him, you don't have the right! It's impossible to agree either!

And you already have a land certificate to prove that the land has long been redivided, and his land has been repossessed! The court will not pay attention to the vexatious trouble!

The only controversy is in the demolished mud brick house! n years later, he won't come back to deal with it, even if you don't dismantle it, it will be scrapped naturally! You can completely tear it down as a scrapped building!

Even if they lose the lawsuit, they will compensate him for the cost of the building for a few thousand yuan at most, and the compensation they get is not enough for the lawyer's fees! The possibility of losing is also very small.

You didn't ask him for alimony, and the cost of the old man's funeral was cheap! They're going to have to give you money!

Look for a range of law books on inheritance law in a bookstore, or consult a law firm.