Questions about the Thousand Miles Eagle telescope in Tmall

Qianli Eagle, relying on a variety of false standards to make up a small domestic brand (I don't know which factory it comes from). The false label is too serious to believe the authenticity of other parameters and materials reported by this brand. More than 100 yuan can buy 60 times hand-held binoculars.

People with a little bit of telescope common sense know that 60 times will shake even if you use a tripod, and there is no way to use it in hand-held, and there is no 60 times hand-held, and the hand-held multiples are 7-12 times. The best use effect is 8-10 times, the most stable, it doesn't look dizzy.

If you choose a telescope, first understand what you are for, if it is a tour. To watch a concert, 8-10 times binocular handheld is the most suitable. If you are not an enthusiast, you generally don't spend a lot of money on famous brands such as "Zeiss".

It is recommended to choose a product without a false standard (whether it is a false standard, you can understand the telescope parameters in 3-5 minutes), and then find out what factory the telescope you choose is made on the Internet (at least half of the telescopes that sell well online are OEM). Last but not least, the renderings on the detail page are all fake, and if you want to be real, you have to look in the comments. (Of course, there are also swiping orders, so the multi-picture is taken together).

Finally, I wish you all the right mirror for yourself.

The so-called "Top 10 Domestic Brands" and "Top 20 Brands" are actually deliberately engaged in some commercialization in order to collect money. There is little value.

I think someone asked it before, but I don't remember exactly. In fact, the most important problem to pay attention to at present, one is that there are many counterfeit and inferior products, and the other is not to choose some unreasonable specifications deliberately engaged in order to attract buyers.

For example, if it is handheld, whether it is a civilian or military telescope, the multiples of the handheld have a standard optimal multiples range, that is, 7 10 times, of which the most commonly used in the military are 7 times and 8 times. The so-called 20 times, 30 times, 50 times, and so on are all deceptive, not even regular products. People who don't understand are easily deceived.

There are other common misleading things such as "infrared", "night vision", "shimmer", etc., which can be systematically understood.

Particular attention is paid to the issues related to multiples, military, night vision, etc., that is, the introduction of some common false propaganda.

If you don't know this, then it is recommended to know more, and wait for yourself to be sure, and then take action, there are many, many people who are deceived by this, although this is not the responsibility of consumers.

In addition, in terms of choice, it is generally recommended to choose a fixed magnification for a hand-held telescope. Don't choose a hand-held telescope that can change magnification.

This telescope is okay, better than Boguan's. You can buy it, and so can the price.

20x22？There is no telescope with this parameter, your telescope is a fake, it is not 20 times as much, you say that you will be dizzy when you look at it, it should be caused by the improper optical axis of the telescope itself! In order to protect your eyes, it is recommended to throw it away and buy a better one!

How to choose a telescope:

1. The imaging effect of the telescope depends on many factors, and the magnification is only one of many factors, and it is not advisable to blindly pursue the multiple.

2. There has never been an infrared night vision telescope, but some specifications of telescopes such as 7x50 also work well in low-light environments.

What brand of telescope is good.

3. The quality of the telescope depends on many factors, such as cost, profit, market strategy, etc., and has nothing to do with the multiple of the telescope.

4. Do not buy binoculars with a wide range of zoom, there are many problems such as small field of view, serious imaging distortion, and easy deviation of the optical axis.

This statement is not standard about how far the telescope can see clearly, and most occasions are used by merchants as misleading publicity, and regular products and occasions will not be promoted like this. For example, some so-called "telescopes that can see 1 km" and "telescopes that can see 5 km". The telescopes of different price ranges are similar to camera lenses at different price points, not because of the difference in distance, but because of the difference in the accuracy of the lens.

Regarding the "How about the Thousand Miles Eagle Telescope" and other questions, please go to other categories to ask questions, this is a platform for legal consultation, and you can't give a professional answer to your questions.

First of all, affirming the doubts you raised, yes, it is not recommended to opt for the zoom structure at the moment for the handheld.

As for the reason, it's complicated, and I'll just briefly talk about it here.

The principle of zoom is very simple, that is, the relative position of different lens groups changes, and the focal length of the lens group is changed, and the magnification of the telescope also naturally changes.

But if you add a condition that the imaging is better when changing the focal length – then the problem is much more complicated.

So under the requirement of such "guaranteed imaging", the zoom structure suddenly became... I once dismantled the zoom part of a scope, and I can't remember exactly, but I saw at least three sets of cemented lenses, moving in their own unique orbits at different moments. Each lens set has its own track.

In the scope, the entire lens structure is all metal machined, with a metal lens base, a metal milled track, and a metal transmission mechanism. Even so, there are still some cases where the definition is low.

And if you look back at the popular zoom handheld telescopes on the market, the price of 100 yuan and 300 yuan, such a price is impossible to use metal milling parts, if this basic can't be done, the accuracy of the zoom structure basically does not exist - people who are slightly familiar with the telescope know that they are far away from the handheld telescope of the zoom structure - they have either suffered losses in this regard, and have learned the clarity of the zoom in a mess. Or maybe it's because I've listened to too many people's experiences. In this regard, it does not hurt to learn more about the experience of our predecessors.

This is only at the level of technical cost, in fact, there are many reasons for this phenomenon, such as market share, not only at the technical level.

Therefore, the current zoom hand-held telescope is basically positioned in: "induce people who are not familiar with telescopes".

I think a lot of the questions are complicated to say, you don't need to know too much, just remember the credible people and tell you the conclusions.

In other words, there are so many pitfalls that you don't have to try them one by one. Listen to the elderly.

Sensei dismantled, this kind of telescope is glued. Without light school instruments and professional drying equipment, even if it is disassembled, it does not make much sense.

This kind of telescope is okay, I also have one, I have used it for more than a year, and it is very resistant to falls.

If you use it often, you can "self-taught" by looking up relevant information on the Internet.

What if it's useless, tell a friend to change it?