What is the difference between inter and amd? Which is better? Thank!

To put it simply,Intel is suitable for server、Professional design,AMD is suitable for playing games,But,If you're a student,Don't use this judgment to paralyze yourself,Deceive your family,All the people who say buy a computer and don't play games are lying,At least self-deception,I bought an 845G motherboard,Still obsessed with CS,Waste of time。 If you buy Intel's CPU, it is recommended that you match Intel's chipset, so that the stability and compatibility are ***, if you buy AMD, it is recommended to match NVIDIA's nForce series, they are a perfect match, stability and compatibility are also very good, unless your money is really not enough, don't buy SIS's chipset, you have to compare the goods, you will know if you buy it. If you want to save some electricity, it's best to use AMD's Athlon series, Intel's CPU has now become an electric tiger, unless your school's electricity is not in vain, you can ignore this sentence.

There is another one, now the mainstream configuration, Intel's can be connected to DDR2, AMD's can only be connected to DDR, and low-end AMD can only use a single channel, and the other differences are not itchy, unless you have any special needs, these you can go to the computer city to walk more, ask more, just ask, don't buy, on the one hand, understand, on the one hand, learn knowledge, on the one hand, distinguish between good and evil, on the one hand. Experience it for yourself, as for some specific applications of the computer, you don't have to worry too much about this, the boat is naturally straight to the bridge, and you will naturally find the answer when you use it, and I haven't heard of any hardware backlog due to incompatibility with software.

Upstairs, don't be so naïve.

Don't pay attention to **, right?

It is recommended to take a look at "Microcomputer".

Personally, I use Intel, because I didn't understand it at the beginning.

Now it's all 64 bits.

It is better to choose AMD, 64-bit technology AMD is more mature than Intel.

It's not a professional drawing or a machine with high requirements.,Generally AMD.。

At least the performance is the same, and it's cheap.

Upstairs is right. If you are playing well with computer hardware, you generally choose AMD's CPU, and you can choose a CPU with good overclocking ability and play overclocking. The main thing is that AMD has a good price/performance ratio, and the same performance is cheaper than Intel's CPU, and the speed is also fast.

Intel's CPU is mainly for people who have relatively stable performance requirements, and they choose more, and they don't know much about computer hardware. Many people always feel that AMD has a lot of heat, and they are afraid that the CPU will burn out accidentally. In fact, whether it's AMD or Intel, you must choose ***, and a fan that matches the CPU, so there must be nothing to worry about.

In short, generally speaking, AMD is good at cost performance and Intel has good stability.

Both have their own advantages and disadvantages, mainly depending on what you are going to do.

For example, if you are very good at computer knowledge, especially if you want to know more about some hardware knowledge, and want to overclock or something after installing the machine, of course, it is better to choose AMD, which has a broader space for us to overclock. It is suitable for some people who have a desire to do hands-on operations and want to do some overclocking practice.

Distinguish? It doesn't make a difference No one can say which one is good and which one is not? Which do you say is better, Kentucky Chicken or McDonald's? Which one do you say is better, China Mobile or China Unicom? A truth!

However, if you want to play games and overclock, AMD's CPU is a little more suitable! Hehe!

Inter stable AMD is unstable. But AMD is better at playing games!Inter play work better!

Let me keep it simple:

The only mainstream companies in the world that manufacture CPUs on PCs are AMD and Intel, which are two companies, so there will be two brands. The technology is not exactly the same.

In terms of models, after so many years, there are too many models.

In AMD, there are current and historical series: Athlon, Flash, Poison, Athlon-64-bit, Athlon-Duo, etc.

In Intel, there are: Pentium, Celeron, Core, Core 2, etc.

The number of CPU pins is too much, such as 462, 754, 775, 755, etc.

AMD's processor does a good floating-point arithmetic (floating-point values are numbers with decimals), so it is better than Intel in 3D.

Of course, this comparison requires a comparison of the same level, but it is rare to find a processor of the same level of two brands, because the standards are different. (Frequency is not an ideal standard, at least I think so, because the two processors have different methods of operation, so the same speed is not the standard.) For example, a person who eats fast does not necessarily eat more than a slow person who eats, and a fast person may have a small bite, and a slow person may have a large bite).

Looking at the current development, the performance difference between the two processors is already very small, just like Coca-Cola and Pepsi, everyone is no longer comparing tastes. It's just a factor in comparing the promotion strength, the relationship with hardware manufacturers, and the degree of customer preference.

It's Intel not Inter, AMD's architectural advantages are mainly reflected in the integration of memory controllers, which makes the communication between CPU and memory quite perfect, so for some tasks with a large amount of CPU memory data exchange, such as games, AMD's advantages can be reflected, AMD's existing interface has 940 AM2 (940) AM3

Intel's architectural advantages are reflected in the core performance, Intel's existing core architecture brings efficient core performance, in the main demand for CPU computing, Intel is much more mature such as multi**,**,**,Drawing Intel's existing interfaces are LGA775 LGA1156 LGA1366